Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search


World Bank Finds Wolfowitz Guilty Now What?

World Bank Finds Wolfowitz Guilty Now What?

By Andreas von Warburg - For More, See... The Gstaad Project

World Bank president Paul Wolfowitz, a former Bush’s Deputy Secretary of Defense, has been found guilty of a conflict of interest in arranging for a pay raise and promotion for Shaha Ali Riza, his girlfriend and a bank employee, in 2005.

The conclusions of the bank special committee, not made public, are bound to step up pressure on Wolfowitz from governments and bank staff, despite his statements last week suggest he’s not willing to resign in the event committee finds him guilty. Calls for resignation have been increasing and have forced one of his top aide, Kevin Kellems, to quit the World Bank.

Staff complaints are targeting a second aide, Robin Cleveland, who followed Wolfowitz after his appointment to the top post at the World Bank., still in place. Both Cleveland, still in place, and Kellems have been the focus of critics over their high salaries — more than $250,000 a year.

According to The New York Times, the panel’s report said that it reviewed extensive documents and testimony before concluding that Wolfowitz breached his obligations in arranging for Riza’s reassignment from the bank to the State Department.

But what is next for Wolfowitz? The panel’s report does not recommend specific actions against him. However, the committee is still working and might forward a recommendation to the bank’s Board of Directors in the next couple of days.

Last week, Wolfowitz issued a broad-based rebuttal that blamed unclear bank rules for creating questions about his handling of hefty pay raises for his girlfriend.

“Rather than attempt to adjudicate between our conflicting interpretations of the events that occurred here, the board should recognize that this situation is the product of ambiguous bank rules and unclear governance mechanisms,” Wolfowitz wrote to the special panel’s chief, Herman Wijffels.

“While I am prepared to acknowledge that we all acted in good faith at the time and there was perhaps some confusion and miscommunication among us, it is grossly unfair and wrong to suggest that I intended to mislead anyone, and I urge the committee to reject the allegation that I lack credibility,” he wrote.

The board has a few choices: it may force Wolfowitz to resign the post or, more likely, express a loss of confidence in his leadership. Such a decision, would leave Wolfowitz at the helm of the organization, but would increase the tensions between the staff and the top management, undermining the effectiveness of the World Bank in the third world – Wolfowitz seems to have the support of only the United States, Canada and Japan at the moment.

But the Wolfowitz affair, as many are now referring to it, might change the face of the World Bank entirely. Since its foundation, the President of the United States has been given the prerogative to choose and nominate the head of the organization – the US holds around 16.4% of total votes, and major decisions require an 85% super-majority. Instead, European government have the prerogative f electing the chief of another Washington-based Bretton Woods institution, the International Monetary Fund.

The recent scandal and new pressure coming from the public opinion in Europe might forced European governments to unprecedentedly put an end to the US role in the selection’s process. Experts and observers are now advising the White House to intervene and ask Wolfowitz to step down – last week Bush voiced his support to his pick.

“If the bank is to carry out its task of helping the world’s poorest countries, it must have a president who possesses the required credibility and support,” a Financial Times editorial read last week. “A change in the method of selecting the heads of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund is overdue. In the current emergency, however, the US should be asked to nominate someone demonstrably suitable for that task.”


© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Gordon Campbell: On The Harry/Meghan Affair, And Iran

Those “Meghzit” headlines seem apt, given how closely Britain’s January 31 exit from the European Union resembles the imminent departure from the Royal Family’s top team of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. For young Iranians, the accidental downing of the Ukrainian airliner is just the latest example of the deadly incompetence and dishonesty of their leaders... More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The Iran Aftermath

So, evidently, you can get away with murder. It looks as though a further escalation in the ongoing war between Iran and the US has been avoided – mainly thanks to Iran NOT responding in kind to the recklessly unhinged behaviour by the United States. Given the massive outpouring of public grief in Iran over the murder of Qassem Soleimani, some reciprocal action by Iran was necessary, but (so far) it has been almost entirely symbolic in nature... More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The Aussie Bush Fires And Suleimani

In popular culture, Australia is often portrayed as Western civilisation’s last unspoiled frontier, or as its final refuge from planetary disaster. In Nevil Shute’s best-selling 1950s novel On The Beach for instance, Melbourne served as the backdrop ... More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The Best Music Of 2019

This was a year where so many of the highlights came from female musicians. But amid all that richness, there was one standout album... More>>

Gordon Campbell: On Scotland’s Renewed Independence Battle

Brexit has always been very much an English obsession... So while it isn’t surprising that Boris Johnson won the election, he might also have lost the United Kingdom in the process. More>>

Analysis: Dotcom Appeal For Surveillance Data Dismissed

Kim Dotcom’s Appeal against the decision allowing the GSCB to withold information as to communications illegally intercepted by them has been dismissed by the Court of Appeal of New Zealand. More>>