Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search


World Bank Split, Democrats Pressure Bush

Wolfowitz Affair: World Bank Split, Democrats Pressure Bush

By Andreas von Warburg - For More, See... The Gstaad Project

The 24-nation Board of Directors of the World Bank has given Paul Wolfowitz more time to respond to a special panel report, which found him guilty of a conflict of interest in arranging for a pay raise and promotion for his girlfriend, Shaha Riza, in 2005. Since the crisis broke earlier last month, pressures have been mounting on the White House and president George W. Bush, who nominated Wolfowitz, his former Deputy Secretary of Defense, to the bank top post in January 2005.

Calls for resignation have been increasing by the minute. Yesterday, senior U.S. Democrats added their voice to the general discontent and urged Bush to help end the “historic crisis.”. In a letter to the U.S. President, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and Democratic Senators Patty Murray, Richard Durbin and Charles Schumer warned that the crisis was damaging the institution and undermining U.S. interests.

“We urge you to take decisive action quickly to bring this crisis to a close,” the letter reads. “The current situation is complex and unfortunately may be fueled in part by views toward Mr. Wolfowitz unrelated to his tenure at the bank.” And other prominent Democrats, including presidential candidates Bill Richardson and John Edwards, have expressed concerns over Wolfowitz’ leadership and how the White House is handling the crisis.

Since the foundation of the World Bank, the President of the United States has been given the prerogative to choose and nominate the head of the organization – the US holds around 16.4% of total votes, and major decisions require an 85% super-majority. Instead, European governments have the prerogative to elect the top executive of another Washington-based Bretton Woods institution, the International Monetary Fund.

Earlier this week, European governments offered the White House a compromise over the so-called Wolfowitz affair. After a meeting in Brussels, EU finance ministers have decided not to challenge the prerogative of the President of the United States to nominate the head of the World Bank if the Bush administration puts an end to the stand-off and pushes Wolfowitz to resign as president of the organization.

While the Bush administration still publicly supports Wolfowitz, the approach is now more cautious. “This is a World Bank matter,” White House spokesman Tony Snow told reporters on Monday.

Wolfowitz has until Friday to respond to the accusations and it’s not yet clear how the board will react to his rebuttal.

The Board of Directors of the World Bank seems split, with Europeans voicing their discontent and the United States lobbying for support – Canada, Japan and a few other Asian and African countries are allying with the U.S.. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has also been lobbying fellow foreign ministers in a bid to help Wolfowitz keep his job, her spokesperson confirmed this morning earlier today.

The crisis has paralyzed the World Bank for more than a month since leaked documents emerged over Wolfowitz’ handling of his girlfriend’s promotion. The furor among bank staff has forced one of Wolfowitz’ top aide, Kevin Kellems, to quit and complaints are now targeting a second aide, Robin Cleveland, who followed Wolfowitz after his appointment to the top post at the World Bank in 2005. Both Cleveland, still in place, and Kellems have been the focus of critics over their high salaries — more than $250,000 a year.


© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Ian Powell: Are we happy living in Handy's Age of Unreason?

On 19 June the Sunday Star Times published my column on the relationship between the Labour government’s stewardship of Aotearoa New Zealand’s health system and the outcome of the next general election expected to be around September-October 2023: Is the health system an electoral sword of Damocles for Labour... More>>

The First Attack On The Independents: Albanese Hobbles The Crossbench
It did not take long for the new Australian Labor government to flex its muscle foolishly in response to the large crossbench of independents and small party members of Parliament. Despite promising a new age of transparency and accountability after the election of May 21, one of the first notable acts of the Albanese government was to attack the very people who gave voice to that movement. Dangerously, old party rule, however slim, is again found boneheaded and wanting... More>>

Binoy Kampmark: Predictable Monstrosities: Priti Patel Approves Assange’s Extradition
The only shock about the UK Home Secretary’s decision regarding Julian Assange was that it did not come sooner. In April, Chief Magistrate Senior District Judge Paul Goldspring expressed the view that he was “duty-bound” to send the case to Priti Patel to decide on whether to extradite the WikiLeaks founder to the United States to face 18 charges, 17 grafted from the US Espionage Act of 1917... More>>

Dunne Speaks: Roe V. Wade Blindsides National

Momentum is everything in politics, but it is very fragile. There are times when unexpected actions can produce big shifts and changes in the political landscape. In 2017, for example, the Labour Party appeared headed for another hefty defeat in that year’s election until the abrupt decision of its then leader to step aside just weeks before the election. That decision changed the political landscape and set in train the events which led to Labour being anointed by New Zealand First to form a coalition government just a few weeks later... More>>

Digitl: Infrastructure Commission wants digital strategy
Earlier this month Te Waihanga, New Zealand’s infrastructure commission, tabled its first Infrastructure Strategy: Rautaki Hanganga o Aotearoa. Te Waihanga describes its document as a road map for a thriving New Zealand... More>>

Binoy Kampmark: Leaking For Roe V Wade
The US Supreme Court Chief Justice was furious. For the first time in history, the raw judicial process of one of the most powerful, and opaque arms of government, had been exposed via media – at least in preliminary form. It resembled, in no negligible way, the publication by WikiLeaks of various drafts of the Trans-Pacific Partnership... More>>