Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search


APEC: road show of the ‘new world order’

APEC: road show of the ‘new world order’

David T. Rowlands

Three-metre high security fences, heart-stopping tasers, a bone-smashing water cannon, mobile prison buses and — perhaps most disturbing of all — the threat of automatic incarceration for randomly abducted protesters? Welcome to the growing international phenomenon of “population control”. The Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum is in Sydney, and NSW security chiefs are telling you to follow orders, shut up and stay away. Prison cells are ready and waiting if you fail to heed the warning.

Perhaps Sydneysiders should not be surprised that harsh “crowd control” measures are accompanying the 2007 APEC meeting. APEC has always been the whip-wielding road show of the “new world order”, pushing a neoliberal free trade agenda and ruthlessly crushing dissent along the way. The harbour city’s residents are now getting a taste of what the disenfranchised masses of the colonised developing world regularly encounter — organised mass repression by militarised state security forces at the behest of imperialist masters.

Since 1993, when the first APEC meeting convened in Seattle, APEC has served the interests of major transnational corporations bent on securing unrestricted access to the natural and human resources of the developing world.

APEC purports to be a forum for global problem-solving and it is true that various peripheral, feel-good issues are debated from time to time. Yet, this is superficial gloss to cover the fundamental purpose of APEC meetings, which is to ensure that the poorer nations of the Asia-Pacific region remain de facto colonies of the wealthy.

Of course this is not an openly stated goal. But one need only observe the destructive impact of “free trade” policies to deduce their true intent: peasant farmers and indigenous groups thrown off their land by mining companies, the elimination of affordable generic medicines, and slave labour regimes in de-unionised sweat shops.

The one thing that can never be debated at APEC is the legitimacy of the free trade agenda, which has become a shibboleth in the post-Cold War era of capitalist triumphalism.

Free trade, according to its fundamentalist neoliberal proponents, is character-building medicine for the developing world. A liberalised, deregulated economy will teach the lazy and uneducated general population some fiscal restraint and responsibility. Free trade also fosters the right sort of “democracy”. Once locked into the US-dominated international financial system, it is far less likely that client regimes will entertain the thought of pursuing alternative development strategies.

Successive US governments, all beholden to the unaccountable private tyranny of corporate power, have ensured that the liberalisation of trade and investment remains the staple agenda item of every APEC meeting.

The Bogor goals of 1994 established APEC’s commitment to “free and open trade and investment in the Asia-Pacific by 2010 for developed economies and 2020 for developing economies”. At subsequent APEC meetings, soothing-sounding euphemisms such as the “Osaka Action Agenda”, the “Manila Action Plan”, “Early Individual Action Plans”, “Voluntary Sectoral Liberalisation” have been employed to legitimise the rising tide of imperialist globalisation.

The Sydney meeting, September 2-9, will undoubtedly produce another contribution to the neoliberal mantra — another detailed plan, another mission statement, another fist in the face for the impoverished of the world.

It is no coincidence that the expensive ($600,000), lumbering, 12,000-litre water cannon aimed at anyone who dares to be on the street during the APEC curfew was manufactured in the US. The Bush administration has funnelled vast amounts of public money into direct subsidies and tax breaks for manufacturers of such “riot control” equipment. As a result, the so-called “security” industry is rapidly becoming one of the most profitable export sectors of the US economy.

Chemical irritants, stun guns, crowd barriers and a water cannon are tools of a foreign policy that cajoles, threatens and bullies governments around the world into getting tough with dissidents who question the morality, legitimacy and sanity of the US-led neoliberal ascendancy.

One of the leading US exporters of riot control vehicles is Security Pro US (SECPRO). SECPRO’s website proudly claims that its vehicles, which “include the latest in water cannon technology” are “helping police forces around the world”. SECPRO vehicles have already been used to crush protests in Europe, Africa, the Americas, Asia and the Middle East. When will Australia be added to the list?

Protesters who dare to point out that free trade is creating massive disparities between rich and poor in the Asia Pacific region will be dealt with. Anyone who suggests that environmental degradation, nuclear proliferation, Indigenous marginalisation and genocidal wars of imperialist conquest are an unacceptable price to pay for “ecomomic growth” will be silenced.

Such talk will not be tolerated by the neoliberal elite, much less if it spills out onto the streets as the limos glide by. With the corporate media enthusiastically blaring on about “violent protesters” taking over the city, dissent has now effectively been criminalised.

Accepted without question by many corporate media outlets is the corresponding militarisation of police, a development that may well have profound consequences for us all long after the slick-suited 21 world leaders have jetted home.


From: Comment & Analysis, Green Left Weekly issue #723 5 September 2007.

© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Peter Dunne: The Steadily Eroding Sands Of Credibility

The ever-shifting sands of the Covid19 vaccination programme are increasingly eroding the credibility of this government.
In January the Prime Minister proclaimed that 2021 would be the “Year of the vaccine” – much the same way as she had promised 2019 would be the “Year of Delivery... More>>

The Conversation: Aggressive Marketing Has Driven The Rise Of The Double-cab Ute On New Zealand Streets — Time To Hit The Brakes?

Explore your inner beast.” That was the slogan used last year to sell the Ford Ranger. At 2.4 tonnes, that’s a lot of “light” truck, but the stakes are rising. This year, the 3.5 tonne Ram 1500 “eats utes for breakfast”... More>>

Ian Powell: Doctors Call For Vaccine Development In New Zealand

On 10 June the Democracy Project published online an article by me on why New Zealand should seriously consider developing its own vaccine manufacturing and supply, particularly in respect of the coronavirus pandemic.. More>>

Climate Explained: Is New Zealand Losing Or Gaining Native Forests?

Apart from wetlands, land above the treeline, coastal dunes and a few other exceptions, New Zealand was once covered in forests from Cape Reinga to Bluff. So was Europe, which basically consisted of a single forest from Sicily in southern Italy to the North Cape in Norway, before human intervention... More>>

Sydney Mockdown: The Delta Variant Strikes

It is proving to be an unfolding nightmare. For a government that had been beaming with pride at their COVID contract tracing for months, insisting that people could live, consume and move about with freedom as health professionals wrapped themselves round the virus, the tune has changed... More>>

Gordon Campbell: On Why The J&J Vaccine Isn’t An Ideal Back-up Option, And Haiti

The news that Medsafe has given approval to Johnson & Johnson’s vaccine means the government is finally putting a backup plan in place, after the series of close shaves it has been experiencing of late in getting its deliveries of the Pfizer vaccine... More>>