Michigan: Desire To Be The Harvard Of The West

Dear Colleagues:

Those (few) who have read Thine Alabaster Cities Gleam, or at least the first volume of the quartet, may remember that I described the University of Michigan of the 1950s as having an elitist mindset. (This is now the mindset in much or most of academia, in law, and elsewhere too) Michigan thought of itself in the 1950s and 1960s as the Harvard of the West. And later, in the 1980s, there was a Michigan T-shirt with the name “Harvard”

Last Saturday, with its defeat by Appalachian State, Michigan got its wish to be the Harvard of the West. Even given the ahistoricity of this society -- the same ahistoricity that in larger matters has caused us to get into one war after another and to become a national security state -- it was shocking that nobody whom I read or saw on TV mentioned a relevant parallel and none seemed aware of it. The parallel is, of course, that Michigan’s defeat is probably the greatest college football upset since tiny Centre College of Danville, Kentucky, a school with less than 300 students, whose team was called “The Praying Colonels,”

(Ironically, it is conceivable that the next greatest upset in college football history after the Centre College and Appalachian State upsets, was Michigan’s own victory over a truly great Ohio State team in 1969, Schembecler’s first year as the coach at Michigan. (That phenomenal Ohio team was then in the middle of a three year run of greatness, while Michigan, for about a twelve period before Schembecler, had usually been mired in mediocrity (though it did win the Big Ten champion

In view of the ahistoricity affecting our society, let me tell you just a bit about the Centre College game with Harvard. Everything being written here about that game itself is taken, I should say, from Allison Danzig’s 1971 book “Oh, How They Played The Game,” a compilation of articles, letters and other writings about college football from its beginnings in the mid 1880s until roughly the late 1920s, but also with some material from periods a bit later than that. (McMillan & Co., 1971.) Fortuitously, I had that book in my brie

Some of the salient points about that game, in brief, are these:

Although our ahistoricity means not too many people will know it, from about the mid to late 1880s, which is about when football had evolved into football instead of being soccer or rugby, until perhaps the 1930s or so, the Ivy League, and particularly Yale and Harvard, were major football powers. (If memory serves, Yale and Harvard may have won twenty or more national championships during that period, with more going to Yale than Harvard.) In 1920, Harvard had not lost since 1916, “was then the ranking football power of the East,” had been unbeaten in 1908, 1910, 1912, 1913, 1914, 1919 and 1920, had won 25 and tied three under C oach Bob Fisher, the coac

Centre College was a school with less than 300 students. Yet, much like Appalachian State, it had in recent years compiled a remarkable record in football. In 1919, “[w]ith a squad composed of only sixteen players,” it had gone undefeated and untied, had scored 485 points to its opponents’ 23 (shades of Fielding Yost’s point a minute teams at Michigan from 1901-1905!), and had beaten Indiana and an undefeated West Virginia team. (Some of its players were well known as coaches in the 1940s and 1950s, whe n I would read of them.)<

Because of its 1919 record, Centre was invited (through various machinations of the Boston media) to play Harvard in 1920. Centre made a game of it in the first half -- at halftime the score was tied at 14 to 14 -- but Harvard “dominated the second half,” scoring two touchdowns and a field goal to win 31 to 14. “The public reaction” to the game “was so favorable that Centre was booked again for 1921” by Harvard. One gathers that, despite its record and its showing in the first half of the 1920 game, tiny Centre was expected to surely lose ag ain to Harvard, a juggern

Centre’s victory was shocking even though it had an unusually good team and record. For a tiny college of less than 300 from Danville Kentucky had defeated one of the great powers of college football. (I know of nothing else like this except perhaps for some of tiny Rio Grande College’s basketball victories over a few major schools in the 1950s when Rio Grande had Bevo Francis.) “Aft er 1924, Centre’s g

Now that great upset has been joined last Saturday by another one, also achieved by a team that had a fine prior record but nonetheless was thought to have no chance against a longstanding major college football power. Now Michigan has joined Harvard as the victims of what likely are the two greatest upsets in college football history. And now Michigan, as a fellow victim, has finally achieved its many, many decades’ old desire to be the Harvard of the West.

This posting represents the personal views of Lawrence R. Velvel. If you wish to comment on the post, on the general topic of the post, or on the comments of others, you can, if you wish, post your comm ent on my website, Velvel

VelvelOnNationalAffairs is now available as a podcast. To subscribe please visit VelvelOnNationalAffairs.com, and click on the link on the top left corner of the page. The podcasts can also be found on iTunes or at www.lrvelvel.libsyn.com

In addition, one hour long television book shows, shown on Comcast, on which Dean Velvel, interviews an author, one hour long television panel shows, also shown on Comcast, on which other MSL personnel interview experts about important subjects, conferences on historical and other important subjects held at MSL, presentations by authors who discuss their books at MSL, a radio program (What The Media Won’t Tell You) which is heard on the World Radio Network (which is on Sirrus and other outlets in the U.S.), and an MSL journal of important issues called The Long Term View, can all be accessed on the internet, including by video and audio. For TV shows go to: www.mslaw.edu/abou t_tv.htm

© Scoop Media