Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search


New fuels, same old bio-piracy

New fuels, same old bio-piracy

by Silvia Ribeiro, Mientras Tanto, in Rebelión

In recent months, critical reports from the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, international institutions crucial in developing neoliberalism, have joined numerous voices from civil society warning of the social, economic and environmental impact of the new wave of biofuels.

One of the explanations for the sudden apparent fit of conscience of that type of organization is that, cloaked in those criticisms, they can promote as a solution new technologies with high risks for the environment and for society but big profits for those who control them. These institutions refrain from asking about fundamental problems like the matrix for energy production and the enormous inequalities of consumption and impacts.

On the other hand, they try and make us think that the "solution" will be technological, via, for example, a "second generation" of biofuels. To that end, they promote and justify (with no real proof of their usefulness nor any mention of their impact) genetically manipulated crops and trees along with the development of even worse technologies like synthetic biology or "extreme genetic engineering" as we in the ETC Group call it.

Synthetic biology, the synthetic creation of DNA, proposes to build living artificial micro-organisms, or to change existing micro-organisms' natural metabolisms with artificial sequences of DNA, so as to process cellulose more efficiently or to produce new fuels. Under the pretext of saving the planet from global warming but with the real motive of taking advantage of global crises to make bigger profits, they have not the least scruple in trying to create hitherto unknown living beings with unpredictable effects.

One example of this kind of activity is the contract announced on April 22nd this year between Amyris Biotechnologies and the Brazilian sugar and ethanol group Crystalsev which proposes to process sugarcane with altered micro-organisms for the production of bio-diesel.

Another example, more directly related to Mexico is the Synthetic Genomics company, created by the controversial geneticist Craig Ventner in 2005 with capital from Monterey businessman Alfonso Romo and the participation of another Mexican, biotechnologist Juan Enríquez Cabot. In June 2007, they allied with the oil company BP to develop synthetic biology and artificial life for biofuels.The most important Mexican contribution to Ventner's private profit was made by Valeria Souza, a researcher in the Ecology Institute of the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM).

In fact, the reserve of microbe resources Ventner's business has available for its experiments in synthetic biology and the millions of profits it augurs, derives from the global journeying Ventner has done sailing the planet's megadiverse seas, taking samples of microbial life in his laboratory ship, Sorcerer 2. Ventner alleged his expedition was "non-profit".

Suspicious, with good reason, other countries' authorities, including Ecuador, Polynesia and Australia, demanded that he sign extensive contracts to prevent the privatization and commercial use of the resources he obtained. They have not been very effective in impeding Ventner's commercial objectives.

But in Mexico he had no trouble at all. It sufficed for him to establish a "collaboration" with Souza - not even with the institution where she does her research - which seems, in exchange for her name in some publications, to have facilitated permission for scientific collection so as to carry off samples of microbe life unique to Yucatán, with no more control than a "declaration of understanding" from Ventner's institution, now defunct.

Valeria Souza already had a similar antecedent, having facilitated studies and extraction of microbe resources unique to Cuatro Ciénagas in Cohauila for the US National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Paradoxically, NASA, among other things, was looking for extremophyle micro-organisms, as too was the Diversa Corporation. Diversa did in fact sign a contract with the UNAM - to extract much less than what Souza enabled Ventner to carry off - but this was cancelled because the Federal Office for Environmental Protection declared that UNAM could not take decisions about the Mexican Federation's genetic resources.

In the Souza-Ventner case, much shadier and broader with regard to both the resources extracted and the procedure undertaken, as well as the vast repercussions of their possible future use, neither the UNAM nor the authorities have taken any measures at all. It is not too late to do so.


Silvia Ribeiro is a researcher for the Erosion, Technology and Concentration Group -

Translation copyleft Tortilla con Sal

© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Ian Powell: Are we happy living in Handy's Age of Unreason?

On 19 June the Sunday Star Times published my column on the relationship between the Labour government’s stewardship of Aotearoa New Zealand’s health system and the outcome of the next general election expected to be around September-October 2023: Is the health system an electoral sword of Damocles for Labour... More>>

The First Attack On The Independents: Albanese Hobbles The Crossbench
It did not take long for the new Australian Labor government to flex its muscle foolishly in response to the large crossbench of independents and small party members of Parliament. Despite promising a new age of transparency and accountability after the election of May 21, one of the first notable acts of the Albanese government was to attack the very people who gave voice to that movement. Dangerously, old party rule, however slim, is again found boneheaded and wanting... More>>

Binoy Kampmark: Predictable Monstrosities: Priti Patel Approves Assange’s Extradition
The only shock about the UK Home Secretary’s decision regarding Julian Assange was that it did not come sooner. In April, Chief Magistrate Senior District Judge Paul Goldspring expressed the view that he was “duty-bound” to send the case to Priti Patel to decide on whether to extradite the WikiLeaks founder to the United States to face 18 charges, 17 grafted from the US Espionage Act of 1917... More>>

Dunne Speaks: Roe V. Wade Blindsides National

Momentum is everything in politics, but it is very fragile. There are times when unexpected actions can produce big shifts and changes in the political landscape. In 2017, for example, the Labour Party appeared headed for another hefty defeat in that year’s election until the abrupt decision of its then leader to step aside just weeks before the election. That decision changed the political landscape and set in train the events which led to Labour being anointed by New Zealand First to form a coalition government just a few weeks later... More>>

Digitl: Infrastructure Commission wants digital strategy
Earlier this month Te Waihanga, New Zealand’s infrastructure commission, tabled its first Infrastructure Strategy: Rautaki Hanganga o Aotearoa. Te Waihanga describes its document as a road map for a thriving New Zealand... More>>

Binoy Kampmark: Leaking For Roe V Wade
The US Supreme Court Chief Justice was furious. For the first time in history, the raw judicial process of one of the most powerful, and opaque arms of government, had been exposed via media – at least in preliminary form. It resembled, in no negligible way, the publication by WikiLeaks of various drafts of the Trans-Pacific Partnership... More>>