Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search

 

Glenn Drops Letter Bombshell On Peters + Images

Owen Glenn Drops Letter Bombshell On Peters + Images


Click for big version
Owen Glenn's letter 'bombshell' to the Privileges Committee

*****

The differing recollections of Owen Glenn and Winston Peters over a donation to assist Mr Peter's court costs in a failed 2005 electoral petition are potentially troubling for either the business world or New Zealand's standing in the world. Mr Glenn is a 'billionaire businessman' and Mr Peters is New Zealand's Foreign Minister.

Owen Glenn has revealed in a letter to the Privileges Committee that Winston Peters personally asked him for a $100,000 donation, and then thanked him once he received it.

Mr Glenn's recollections seem at odds with Mr Peters previous claims and evidence to the Privileges Committee that he had no knowledge of the donation until his lawyer Brian Henry advised him of it last month. The donation from expatriate businessman Glenn was made to Mr Henry in 2006 to help pay Mr Peters' legal costs after Mr Peters was unsuccessful in launching an electoral petition against current Tauranga MP Bob 'the builder' Clarkson.

Mr Peters said in a rebuttal letter it "does not coincide with my recollections" that he had personally requested the donation.

The donation is currently the focus of Parliament's Privileges Committee, which is looking into whether Mr Peters broke Parliament's rules by failing to declare the donation, which could be treated as a personal gift.

In his letter Mr Glenn asserts that Mr Peters had sought the donation from him.

"The payment was made by me to assist funding the legal costs incurred personally by Rt Hon Winston Peters MP concerning his election petition dispute, at his request.

"Mr Peters sought help from me for this purpose in a personal conversation, some time after I had first met him in Sydney.

"I agreed to help in the belief that this step would also assist the Labour Party in its relationship with Mr Peters. I supported the Labour Party."

He added that Mr Peters had then thanked him at the Karaka yearling sales in early 2006, and that he did not believe he had ever met or spoken to Mr Henry.

As well as stating that Mr Glenn is 'not factual' for alleging he requested assistance over his legal costs, Mr Peters further believed the "personal conversation" referred to by Mr Glenn was one that Mr Glenn had held with Mr Henry. Mr Peters also said he believed he had seen Mr Glenn while the two lunched at the same table at the 2007 Karaka sales, rather than in 2006.

Mr Peters said in his letter that he had not thanked him until after Mr Henry advised him of the payment on July 18 this year.

Simon Power, Committee chairman, today said the two statements were inconsistent, and that the committee would meet again to consider the matter on Thursday next week.

Winston Peters' Rebuttal to Owen Glenn's Letter


Click for big version



Click for big version

ENDS

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 


Ian Powell: Are we happy living in Handy's Age of Unreason?

On 19 June the Sunday Star Times published my column on the relationship between the Labour government’s stewardship of Aotearoa New Zealand’s health system and the outcome of the next general election expected to be around September-October 2023: Is the health system an electoral sword of Damocles for Labour... More>>


The First Attack On The Independents: Albanese Hobbles The Crossbench
It did not take long for the new Australian Labor government to flex its muscle foolishly in response to the large crossbench of independents and small party members of Parliament. Despite promising a new age of transparency and accountability after the election of May 21, one of the first notable acts of the Albanese government was to attack the very people who gave voice to that movement. Dangerously, old party rule, however slim, is again found boneheaded and wanting... More>>


Binoy Kampmark: Predictable Monstrosities: Priti Patel Approves Assange’s Extradition
The only shock about the UK Home Secretary’s decision regarding Julian Assange was that it did not come sooner. In April, Chief Magistrate Senior District Judge Paul Goldspring expressed the view that he was “duty-bound” to send the case to Priti Patel to decide on whether to extradite the WikiLeaks founder to the United States to face 18 charges, 17 grafted from the US Espionage Act of 1917... More>>


Dunne Speaks: Roe V. Wade Blindsides National

Momentum is everything in politics, but it is very fragile. There are times when unexpected actions can produce big shifts and changes in the political landscape. In 2017, for example, the Labour Party appeared headed for another hefty defeat in that year’s election until the abrupt decision of its then leader to step aside just weeks before the election. That decision changed the political landscape and set in train the events which led to Labour being anointed by New Zealand First to form a coalition government just a few weeks later... More>>

Digitl: Infrastructure Commission wants digital strategy
Earlier this month Te Waihanga, New Zealand’s infrastructure commission, tabled its first Infrastructure Strategy: Rautaki Hanganga o Aotearoa. Te Waihanga describes its document as a road map for a thriving New Zealand... More>>


Binoy Kampmark: Leaking For Roe V Wade
The US Supreme Court Chief Justice was furious. For the first time in history, the raw judicial process of one of the most powerful, and opaque arms of government, had been exposed via media – at least in preliminary form. It resembled, in no negligible way, the publication by WikiLeaks of various drafts of the Trans-Pacific Partnership... More>>