Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search


The worst alcohol problem in NZ is in Parliament

The worst alcohol problem in NZ is in Parliament

By Roger Brooking

The worst alcohol problem in New Zealand is in Parliament. Its not that politicians drink too much, although that’s a definite possibility; it’s because political parties use conscience voting to decide policy on alcohol related issues. Instead of using well researched evidence on what actually works and using that to form party policy, National and Labour effectively have no policy on reducing alcohol related harm in society at all; they allow their MPs to vote according to their ‘conscience’.

The first time conscience voting was used in New Zealand was in the chaotic times of European settlement during the 1870s. David Lindsay has written a thesis on this subject. In an article in ‘Alcohol’ published in 2008, Lindsay wrote “most MPs at the time agreed that alcohol was a disruptive influence on society, but they disagreed on what to do about it”. So a conscience vote was allowed regarding the sale and consumption of alcohol.

Little has changed in 140 years. Alcohol is still a disruptive influence and politicians still disagree on what to do about it. Worse still, Parliament has stuck to this outmoded and irrelevant tradition of allowing conscience votes on alcohol related issues.

In the same article, Ross Bell, Executive Director of the New Zealand Drug Foundation, commented that there is no parliamentary rule that conscience voting has to be used for any particular piece of legislation. Mr Bell says that the major political parties lack the moral courage to take a stand on alcohol. “Parties are too timid to come up with decent alcohol policy and take a full party position. Parties should be forming policies based on evidence, instead of hiding behind the conscience vote as an excuse to not show leadership,” he says.

Professor Doug Sellman, Director of the National Addictions Centre, was also quoted. “When a government resorts to conscience voting, it is not governing. Alcohol is New Zealanders’ favourite drug, yet governments haven’t yet been able to deliver policies to deal with its harms effectively. Without rational public discussion about drugs, including the various political parties clearly stating their positions, we are not going to get rational drug policy. Conscience voting hasn’t delivered good public policy to date on what is a very serious issue for this country,” he said.

Conscience voting on alcohol issues seems to continue in Parliament because it’s a tradition that has been going for 140 years and parliamentary traditions are hard to change. However, it also demonstrates that even after 140 years, politicians are still confused about alcohol and what to do about it.

Unfortunately, this confusion then manifests in public policy and judicial decision making. For example, since the 1950s, there have been 46 occasions in Parliament in which issues relating to alcohol were decided by a conscience vote. In the same period there were only five occasions where law and order issues were decided by a conscience vote. Given the close relationship between drinking and crime, it defies all logic for political parties to have firm policies on law and order, but no policies on alcohol which contributes to so much offending.

This confusion is then perpetuated by judges faced with offenders appearing in Court for crimes committed under the influence of alcohol and drugs. Judges have no difficulty imposing sentences of punishment and deterrence because the penalties imposed by legislation are usually very clear. However, judges struggle to include sanctions which might assist offenders into treatment or rehabilitation programmes because this is not generally included by the legislation. No wonder judges order only 5% of the 25,000 people convicted for drink driving every year to seek treatment for a drinking problem.


Roger Brooking is Clinical Manager ADAC Ltd - Alcohol & Drug Assessment & Counselling

© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Gordon Campbell: On The Lockdown, Masks And Aerosol Transmission

Ironically, our relative success in suppressing the exponential spread of Covid-19 is only increasing the pressure to ease back from those measures, on a regional basis at least. We seem set on course to start tentatively emerging from lockdown in about ... More>>

Gordon Campbell: On Wage Cuts, And The Listener’s Demise

Various levels of across the board wage cuts – 10%? 15% ?- are being mooted for workers in some of our larger firms, in order to help the likes of Fletchers, Mediaworks etc survive the Covid-19 crisis. It is extraordinary that unions should be having ... More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The Use Of Existing Drugs To Reduce The Effects Of Coronavirus

So now, we’re all getting up to speed with the travel bans, the rigorous handwashing and drying, the social distancing, and the avoidance of public transport wherever possible. Right. At a wider level…so far, the public health system has ... More>>

Gordon Campbell: On Oil Market And Regulation Crusades

Safe to say, Vladimir Putin did not expect the response he has received amidships from the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia. Earlier, Russia chose to walk away from the OPEC talks in Vienna that were aimed at reaching an agreement on how to reduce world oil production (and protect oil prices) in the light of the fall in demand being caused by the coronavirus. More>>

Binoy Kampmark: Strong Man Legacies: Burying Mubarak

Reviled strongmen of one era are often the celebrated ones of others. Citizens otherwise tormented find that replacements are poor, in some cases even crueller, than the original artefact. Such strongmen also serve as ideal alibis for rehabilitation ... More>>

Caitlin Johnstone: Humanity Is Making A Very Important Choice When It Comes To Assange

The propagandists have all gone dead silent on the WikiLeaks founder they previously were smearing with relentless viciousness, because they no longer have an argument. The facts are all in, and yes, it turns out the US government is certainly and undeniably working to exploit legal loopholes to imprison a journalist for exposing its war crimes. That is happening, and there is no justifying it... More>>

Gail Duncan: Reframing Welfare Report

Michael Joseph Savage, the architect of the 1938 Social Security Act, wouldn’t recognise today’s Social Security Act as having anything to do with the kind, cooperative, caring society he envisioned 80 years ago. Instead society in 2020 has been reduced ... More>>

Gordon Campbell: On 22 Short Takes About Super Tuesday

With obvious apologies to the Simpsons….Here’s my 22 short takes on the 14 Super Tuesday primaries that combined yesterday to produce a common narrative –Bernie Sanders NOT running away with the nomination, Joe Biden coming back from the dead, and the really, really rich guy proving to be really, really bad at politics... More>>


  • PublicAddress
  • Pundit
  • Kiwiblog