Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search

 

Marc Ash: This Isn't Working

This Isn't Working

Monday 13 April 2009

by: Marc Ash, t r u t h o u t | Perspective

Still well short of the Obama administration's 100th day in office, substantive judgment would normally be premature at best, but these are extraordinary times. The raging inferno of corruption that began in the Bush years burns out of control now, and time is of the essence. Some would argue the corruption was always there, is always there, a flaw in the human spirit that is never gone, but for a time controlled. In either case, the fire is now raging and threatens to consume everything.

While the new, and very popular, President Barack Obama appears to mean well, Hillary Clinton's admonishment that he was unprepared for what lays ahead now seems more real than at first imagined.

Economics were central to the outcome of the November elections. More to the point, economic reform. Obama, a noteworthy beneficiary of that voter outrage, appears however to be deferring to the best judgment of his economic advisers. Foremost among them, Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner and Chairman of the National Economic Council Lawrence H. Summers. It's not clear exactly what Obama wants, but Geithner and Summers want to repair Wall Street, to resurrect the system that now cannibalizes the nation's economy, not reform it. Geithner and Summers like the Wall Street system, and they want you to like it, too. But even if you don't like it, they definitely want you pay for it. You are, and how.

What we're seeing here is a reinvestment in, not a divestment from, Reaganomics. The cost is staggering and the ramifications are long-term. In the opinion of Obama administration economists, the nation's, and for that matter the world's, financial structures revolve around Wall Street. Geithner and Summers appear to be determined to restore Wall Street, no matter what the cost. But what if restoring Wall Street doesn't fix the problem? What if Wall Street is the problem? Geithner and Summers have missed the most fundamental component in this equation; the American Worker does not depend on Wall Street; Wall Street depends on the American worker. Destroying the American worker to save the investment banker truly defeats the system.

Regulation is a critical missing element in any meaningful attempt to an economic reform. But regulation means nothing without law enforcement. Unless ultimately there is a jail cell waiting for those who break the law, then regulation is theater and nothing more. Law enforcement - in earnest - ceased to exist on a federal governmental level during the Bush years. Anyone who would, or even potentially could, bring a criminal action against Bush administration officials was removed or intimidated into silence. It was the era of lawlessness for America's elite, and for some of the nation's most powerful financiers it continues. For the better part of a decade, the message has been clear: "if you are powerful and connected you will never face meaningful prosecution". You are above the law.

The nation's top cop is Attorney General Eric Holder. While Holder is certainly qualified for the post, there is no indication at this admittedly early stage that he has any plans to bring criminal actions against the nation's rich and powerful, regardless of the evidence. And there is evidence aplenty. The silence from the Department of Justice is deafening, and the clock is ticking.

All of this stops at the water's edge, but our problems do not. Both of Mr. Bush's wars continue and President Obama will awake one day soon to find that they are his. Again, the president defers to the experts; in this case, the generals; again, the experts lead in a direction of their choosing, not in the direction mandated by the voters. If an occupation cannot be won, can two occupations at once be survived? Iraq simmers for the freedom we promised, and the rage now boils anew. In Afghanistan, the question of the day is: What's the difference between the Taliban and the Mujahideen? Answer: We are now the ones in the Afghan trap.

Deferring to the experts is a wonderful thing, a very democratic thing in fact, something George W. Bush refused to do, micromanaging everything to the end. We are, however, rapidly moving in the wrong direction. We need to bring the troops home, stop the epidemic of foreclosures, and put the wealthy crooks in jail beside the poor crooks. If the administration doesn't have the players in place to confront the problem, they need to go out and get better players.

The hour is late, and this isn't working.

ENDS

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 

Eric Zuesse: U.S. Empire: Biden And Kerry Gave Orders To Ukraine’s President

Eric Zuesse, originally posted at Strategic Culture On May 19th, an implicit international political warning was issued, but it wasn’t issued between countries; it was issued between allied versus opposed factions within each of two countries: U.S. and Ukraine. ... More>>

Binoy Kampmark: Budget Cockups In The Time Of Coronavirus: Reporting Errors And Australia’s JobKeeper Scheme

Hell has, in its raging fires, ringside seats for those who like their spreadsheets. The seating, already peopled by those from human resources, white collar criminals and accountants, becomes toastier for those who make errors with those spreadsheets. ... More>>


The Dig - COVID-19: Just Recovery

The COVID-19 crisis is compelling us to kick-start investment in a regenerative and zero-carbon future. We were bold enough to act quickly to stop the virus - can we now chart a course for a just recovery? More>>

The Conversation: Are New Zealand's New COVID-19 Laws And Powers Really A Step Towards A Police State?

Reaction to the New Zealand government’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic and resultant lockdown has ranged from high praise to criticism that its actions were illegal and its management chaotic. More>>


Keith Rankin: Universal Versus Targeted Assistance, A Muddled Dichotomy

The Commentariat There is a regular commentariat who appear on places such as 'The Panel' on Radio New Zealand (4pm on weekdays), and on panels on television shows such as Newshub Nation (TV3, weekends) and Q+A (TV1, Mondays). Generally, these panellists ... More>>


Binoy Kampmark: Welcome Deaths: Coronavirus And The Open Plan Office

For anybody familiar with that gruesome manifestation of the modern work place, namely the open plan office, the advent of coronavirus might be something of a relief. The prospects for infection in such spaces is simply too great. You are at risk from ... More>>

Caitlin Johnstone: Do You Consent To The New Cold War?

The world's worst Putin puppet is escalating tensions with Russia even further, with the Trump administration looking at withdrawal from more nuclear treaties in the near future. In addition to planning on withdrawing from the Open Skies Treaty ... More>>


Binoy Kampmark: Why Thinking Makes It So: Donald Trump’s Obamagate Fixation

The “gate” suffix has been wearing thin since the break-in scandal that gave it its birth. Since Watergate, virtually anything dubious and suggestive, and much more besides, is suffixed. Which brings us to the issue of President Donald Trump’s ... More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The Ethics (and Some Of The Economics) Of Lifting The Lockdown

As New Zealand passes the half-way mark towards moving out of Level Four lockdown, the trade-offs involved in life-after-lockdown are starting to come into view. All very well for National’s finance spokesperson Paul Goldsmith to claim that “The number one priority we have is to get out of the lockdown as soon as we can”…Yet as PM Jacinda Ardern pointed out a few days ago, any crude trade-off between public health and economic well-being would be a false choice... More>>


Binoy Kampmark: Brutal Choices: Anders Tegnell And Sweden’s Herd Immunity Goal

If the title of epidemiological czar were to be created, its first occupant would have to be Sweden’s Anders Tegnell. He has held sway in the face of sceptics and concern that his “herd immunity” approach to COVID-19 is a dangerous, and breathtakingly ... More>>


 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 
  • PublicAddress
  • Pundit
  • Kiwiblog