Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Work smarter with a Pro licence Learn More
Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search

 

Did Iran kill its own Scientist?

Did Iran kill its own Scientist?

Dissidents hint Iran Orchestrated the killing of its Nuclear Scientist to Portray itself a Victim.

By Abbas Rezai
January 14, 2012

The mysterious killing of an Iranian nuclear scientist this week has led to speculations about the real motives behind these coordinated operations. This latest is the fourth of its kind in the past two years.

As the news of the assassination broke out, a number of well-known pro-Iran lobbyists started to blame Israel, the U.S. and the main Iranian opposition group the Mujahedin-e Khalq, MEK, for the killing.

Richard Silverstein an American-Jewish blogger who supports Iran's nuclear ambitions to be "legitimate" got the headlines in Iran's state-run media. The assassination was a "joint Mossad-MEK operation," he wrote. The story was based on an uncorroborated claim by his "confidential Israeli source". A similar thing happened in November 2011 when an explosion at a base of Iran's Revolutionary Guards killed 17 Guards members. Silverstein then claimed that explosion was a joint venture by the Mossad and MEK. His only proof was an unnamed Israeli source. When pressed whether his 'source' had ever broken such stories before? Silverstein replied "I'd rather not be more specific."

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

Trita Parsi, a U.S.-based Iranian lobbyist with well-established links to Iran's authorities, who helped the regime launching a massive campaign to maintain the MEK on U.S. Terror list last summer, was quoted in the Iran's state-run media, parroting the claim of a joint Israel-MEK operation.

European Courts tasked with investigating the terror designation on MEK, having looked through all secret materials, did not find evidence linking the MEK with any violent acts since they had declared an end to military operations in 2001.

Iran has a long record of orchestrating media campaigns to spread misinformation and rumours targeting its opposition. In some cases media outlets have been offered six-figure sums to publish a story against MEK.

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton "categorically" denied any U.S. involvement in this latest incident.

The MEK for their part rejected any role. "Attributing murder of the mullahs' regime nuclear scientist to the PMOI is absolutely false", a statement from Paris based umbrella organisation NCRI which the MEK is a party of stressed.

In 2002, NCRI was first to blow the whistle on Iran's secret nuclear ambitions which had been kept secret from western intelligence for 18 years. The information proved accurate. Several Iranian scientists were later arrested and executed by the regime for having passed that information to NCRI.

Iran's leaders are now suspected in quietly eliminating potential discontented nuclear scientists for double gains: preventing further leaks of their nuclear weapons program, while portraying themselves as victims to western insurgency and accusing their opposition for terrorism.

Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Khamenei had ordered a special unit of the Revolutionary Guards that "as soon as a sign is detected that a nuclear expert is distancing from the regime or has the intention of leaving the country, he should be eliminated and the blame should be put on the MEK, agents of the U.S., Israel, and World Arrogance," the NCRI statement revealed.

The Green Embassy Campaign, a group of defected Iranian diplomats with headquarters in Oslo posted a statement accusing Iran’s leaders for the assassinat¬ion of the scientist.

“The late Mostafa Ahmadi Roshan was a critic of the regime’s nuclear program in its current form which is done to the cost of national poverty, inflation, sanctions and escalation to a new war on the Iranian nation,” the statement in Farsi reads. “He was against buying raw material from Africa and Latin America and bribing Venezuelan statesmen to secretly transport the material to Iran and North Korea.”

Ironically, four days before this latest assassination, the Director of Iran's Atomic Organisation told the state-run Fars news agency: "we shouldn't be ignorant that as soldiers fled the battlefield during the war, in the scientific war there are also scientists who, for the sake of preserving their international connections, refuse to cooperate in (our) nuclear projects.... Of course we have never been worried about this since there is plenty of human resources and experts in the country."

The timing of this latest assassination becomes more intriguing as some fear it could be used to justify the execution of an Iranian-American former U.S Marine, sentenced to death earlier this week on charges of espionage, despite statements by him, his family, and the U.S. government that he is not a spy.

While few would shed any tear on Iran's leaders losing their nuclear capability, it is important to differentiate facts from fiction as one could easily end up dancing to the mullahs' tune.

ENDS

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.