Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search


What is owed to us? Introducing a UBI in New Zealand

What about us?

We are not algorithms, numbers or bots. We are people. People with emotions, feelings and empathy toward our families and the communities we live in. But we wouldn’t know that when we look at the way we and most of our community are being squeezed into ever smaller boxes while the lids are screwed down tighter and tighter.

We have been left dispossessed, sick, and helpless. And we should be angry that the economic rights guaranteed to us under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948 have not been delivered upon. Instead, we have become the collateral damage of an economic and financial system run amok for the benefit of a few.

Example: The Benefit System

This past year there was the well covered story of the Auckland Action Against Poverty (AAAP) group setting up an advocacy service for beneficiaries. The service proved so popular that the Clendon WINZ office couldn’t service all the beneficiaries knocking at the door, with lines of applicants going down the street.
There is a reason why it was so popular and it only serves to give credance to the accounts of many beneficiaries. It is clear that WINZ is set up to limit access to the income support that we are legally entitled to.

The Enclosure of the Commons

The limiting of our rights is not isolated to the income support issue.
From declining access to housing, health, and quality childcare (including in-family care) to a deteriorating environment, we are being steadily dispossessed of our collective commons.

These commons are the assets that are collectively owned or controlled by the community, at a local, national, or international level. Their enclosure means the elimination or restriction of common access through privatization and commercialisation.

These assets that we have owned and built together over thousands of years are being kept from us. The reward from the efforts of countless generations before us have been taken by a select few.

Universal Basic Income as a tool for democracy.

In their book, The Big Kahuna: Tax and Welfare Gareth Morgan & Susan Guthrie commendably broadened the UBI issue to a debate about tax and welfare. Keith Rankin has contributed to this debate as well. What has been less well discussed is the democratizing power of UBI itself.

Universal Basic Income is a rare policy of unity. If we increase it, we increase it together. If we decrease it, we decrease it together. We don’t change it for him or her, or for them, we change it for us.

A UBI would transform the income support issue in New Zealand. The new political question would be, what is owed to us? From this position, we would be empowered to claim our rightful share of the commons. And perhaps we would finally fulfill the obligations we agreed to when we signed that landmark Human Rights document three generations ago.

Four Steps towards a UBI

We have researched for consideration four steps towards a comprehensive universal basic income.

1. Turn WINZ into BINZ by introducing an income neutral basic income

- Abolish income support except for accommodation supplements and temporary special payment for child care, disability, and hardship.
- Introduce initial weekly basic income of roughly $200/adult and $100/child.
- Amend Tax rates on earned incomes to maintain income neutrality whatever our present earned income may be or become.

2. Index the initial basic income with inflation, growth, and (if we choose) increased productivity.

- The extra productivity provision will involve a small annual income redistribution that will need to be funded from taxation or other sources.
- For example, we could fund a 1.5% annual productivity increase to our basic income with a progressive flat tax on all earned personal income of about 0.6%/year. This indexation would double the real value of our basic income in 20 years without radical tax changes.
- A progressive indexation could be used purely for redistribution, or also for the eventual replacement of the Accommodation Supplement.

3. Introduce granting deposits and mortgage guarantees scheme

The largest cost issue for introducing a UBI is incorporating what is covered by the Accommodation Supplement. To introduce a uniform UBI payment that covers the highest current levels of accommodation support (i.e. in cities like Auckland) would add significant cost to a UBI scheme. One way to bring down the cost is to reduce the number of people needing the Supplement who live in those areas.

This could be achieved by granting deposits and mortgage guarantees to families most in need to buy their own home in lower cost areas. The policy would be an extension of the present government voluntary housing relocation policy but makes it truly worthwhile for families to move.

One astounding advantage to the policy is that it is economically at least 1000% more efficient than the current supply-side solutions being promoted at the moment to address the housing crisis. Read more on this policy here.

4. Implement a basic income for children

- We could eliminate child poverty in New Zealand (more than a quarter of children live in relative poverty) by introducing a separate Kids’ Basic Income for all children under the age of 18.
- It could be set at any level using various funding mechanism, but for example, we could fund $30/week for all children with a one-off progressive flat tax increase on all earned personal income of about 1.17%.
- If a Kids’ Basic Income of $60/week was introduced alongside the indexation of the UBI in step 2 we could eliminate child poverty in five years.

Basic Income New Zealand will work with anyone willing to consider, test and implement universal basic income. We look forward to seeing the good ideas that this HiveMind will generate.

This article is a complementary piece to the Universal Basic Income HiveMind currently running on Scoop and to the UBI background article written by Joseph Cederwall.

Click here to take part in the Universal basic Income HiveMind now.

Michael Kane & Lowell Manning
Basic Income New Zealand Incorporated

© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Gordon Campbell: On The Addiction To Chinese Student Fees

Last week, Australian PM Scott Morrison extended its ban on foreign visitors from or passing through from mainland China – including Chinese students - for a third week. New Zealand has dutifully followed suit, with our travel ban ... More>>

Gordon Campbell: On Coronavirus, And The Iowa Debacle

As Bloomberg says, the coronavirus shutdown is creating the world’s biggest work-from-home experiment. On the upside, the mortality rate with the current outbreak is lower than with SARS in 2003, but (for a number of reasons) the economic impact this time ... More>>

Gordon Campbell: On Dodging A Bullet Over The Transport Cost Over-Runs

As New Zealand gears up to begin its $6.8 billion programme of large scale roading projects all around the country, we should be aware of this morning’s sobering headlines from New South Wales, where the cost overruns on major transport projects ... More>>

Gordon Campbell:On Kobemania, Palestine And The Infrastructure Package

Quick quiz to end the week. What deserves the more attention – the death of a US basketball legend, or the end of Palestinian hopes for an independent state? Both died this week, but only one was met with almost total indifference by the global community. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The Double Standard That’s Bound To Dominate The Election

Are National really better political managers than Labour, particularly when it comes to running the economy? For many voters – and the business community in particular - their belief in National’s inherent competence is a simple act of faith. More>>

Gordon Campbell : On Dealing With Impeccable, Impeachable Lies

By now, the end game the Republican Senate majority has in mind in their setting of the rules for the impeachment trial of Donald J. Trump is pretty clear to everyone: first deny the Democrats the ability to call witnesses and offer evidence, and then derisively dismiss the charges for lack of evidence. For his part, does former security adviser John Bolton really, really want to testify against his former boss? If there was any competing faction within the Republican Party, there might be some point for Bolton in doing so – but there isn’t. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On Why The Dice Are Loaded Against Women..

If they enter public life, women can expect a type of intense (and contradictory) scrutiny that is rarely applied to their male counterparts... More>>


  • PublicAddress
  • Pundit
  • Kiwiblog