Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search

 

New details around NZ First conflicts of interest timeline

New details around New Zealand First conflicts of interest timeline emerge
Jane Patterson, political editor

New information has emerged showing it was the New Zealand First chief of staff who identified potential conflicts of interest between a forestry company and two senior government ministers, sparking a series of declarations.

Deputy Prime Minister and New Zealand First leader, Winston Peters, and regional economic development minister, Shane Jones Photo: RNZ

Deputy Prime Minister and NZ First leader Winston Peters and regional economic development minister Shane Jones have both declared conflicts in relation to NZ Future Forest Products (NZFFP).

The company's directors include Winston Peters' lawyer Brian Henry and Mr Peters' partner Jan Trotman; it made an unsuccessful bid to borrow $15 million from the Provincial Growth Fund, which Mr Jones is responsible for.

Mr Jones has recused himself from the decision-making over the bid because of his long-standing relationship with Mr Henry, who is the judicial officer for NZ First as well as Mr Peters' lawyer.

Documents provided to RNZ show Mr Jones wrote to the prime minister advising her of his conflict of interests on 14 October - the same day RNZ lodged an Official Information Act request with his office.

New Zealand First has since given RNZ a number of emails showing the chief of staff, Jon Johansson, had drafted two letters, one for Mr Peters and one for Mr Jones, the Friday before - on the 11th.

Mr Jones has told Parliament he was only "formally" made aware of the NZFFP bid to the Provincial Growth Fund on 14 October; Mr Johansson said the minister's office was informed about draft letters on the Friday.

Mr Johansson said he had asked for more detailed information about all of the companies applying to the Provincial Development Unit.

After doing further due diligence he said he discovered the connection between Jan Trotman, Brian Henry and NZ Future Forest Products, and the resultant conflict of interest for Mr Peters and Mr Jones.

Mr Peters' conflict of interest letter, dated 14 October, states there had been "no visibility" for him on any aspect of NZFFPs Provincial Growth Fund application, "nor foreknowledge of its lodgement ... until my chief of staff brought it to my attention this morning".

The Cabinet Office confirmed on 7 November Mr Peters' register of interests had been updated accordingly, saying the prime minister would not be "specifically briefed" on the change, but her office had been included in communications.

Her approval was also sought to transfer ministerial responsibility for the decision on the Fund application away from Mr Jones.

Mr Jones' letter also includes the assurance he had neither seen anything to do with the PGF application, nor knew about it beforehand.

His conflict relates to the NZFFP directorship of David Henry, Brian Henry's son. The letter says Brian Henry is a "long time lawyer of the NZF leader and an acquaintance" of the minister.

"Although I have the barest of relationships with David Henry it is prudent and appropriate for me to declare a conflict of interest," his letter states.

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 


Julian Assange: A Thousand Days In Belmarsh
Julian Assange has now been in the maximum-security facilities of Belmarsh prison for over 1,000 days. On the occasion of his 1,000th day of imprisonment, campaigners, supporters and kindred spirits gathered to show their support, indignation and solidarity at this political detention most foul... More>>

Binoy Kampmark: The Mauling Of Novak Djokovic
Rarely can the treatment of a grand sporting figure by officialdom have caused such consternation. Novak Djokovic, the tennis World Number One, has always had a tendency to get under skin and constitution, creating a large following of admirers and detractors. But his current treatment by Australian authorities, and his subsequent detention as an unlawful arrival despite being granted a visa to participate in the Australian Open, had the hallmarks of oppression and incompetent vulgarity... More>>

Binoy Kampmark: Voices Of Concern: Aussies For Assange’s Return

With Julian Assange now fighting the next stage of efforts to extradite him to the United States to face 18 charges, 17 of which are based on the brutal, archaic Espionage Act, some Australian politicians have found their voice. It might be said that a few have even found their conscience... More>>



Forbidden Parties: Boris Johnson’s Law On Illegal Covid Gatherings

It was meant to be time to reflect. The eager arms of a new pandemic were enfolding a society with asphyxiating, lethal effect. Public health authorities advocated various measures: social distancing, limited contact between family and friends, limited mobility. No grand booze-ups. No large parties. No bonking, except within dispensations of intimacy and various “bubble” arrangements. Certainly, no orgies... More>>

Dunne Speaks: Question Time Is Anything But
The focus placed on the first couple of Question Time exchanges between the new leader of the National Party and the Prime Minister will have seemed excessive to many but the most seasoned Parliamentary observers. Most people, especially those outside the Wellington beltway, imagine Question Time is exactly what it sounds... More>>



Gasbagging In Glasgow: COP26 And Phasing Down Coal

Words can provide sharp traps, fettering language and caging definitions. They can also speak to freedom of action and permissiveness. At COP26, that permissiveness was all the more present in the haggling ahead of what would become the Glasgow Climate Pact... More>>