Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search

 

Queer Indo-Fijian Activist Shaneel Lal Dissects The Conversion Therapy Ban Bill (NZ)

Following a record-breaking number of submissions to the Conversion Practices Prohibition Legislation Bill, the Select Committee process is now underway. The Pacific Cooperation Foundation asked leading Indo-Fijian activist Shaneel Lal, founder of the Conversion Therapy Action Group, to provide their views on the Bill in its current form as it undergoes intense scrutiny here in Aotearoa New Zealand.

 

The New Zealand Labour Party conceded to the political pressure to ban gay and gender conversion therapy during the 2020 election. However, the Government has put forward an ineffective and inadequate Bill that provides loopholes for conversion therapy to continue.

The Government claims that the Conversion Practices Prohibition Legislation Bill will end conversion therapy. However, the Bill only creates a criminal ban. Banning conversion therapy is a part of ending conversion therapy, but that alone won’t end conversion therapy. A ban relies on the criminal justice system to catch and punish people. Most reported cases of crime aren't prosecuted. Most prosecuted cases aren't convicted. And most convicted people re-offend.

The criminal justice system disproportionately affects Māori and Pacific peoples in Aotearoa. Homophobia and transphobia are pervasive remainings of colonisation in the Pacific community. Any effort to criminalise queerphobic practices without addressing the underlying lack of education will increase the disproportionate incarceration of Māori and Pacific peoples.

Ending conversion therapy requires mandating LGBTQIA+ education to change the mindset of generations of people towards queer people so that conversion therapy ceases to exist. It requires the Government to provide affirming care to queer people, so queer people do not feel coerced to enter conversion therapy. There is no indication that the Government will take steps that will end conversion therapy.

The Bill does not guarantee victims any compensation to seek help. Victims may seek redress from the Human Rights Commission and the Human Rights Review Tribunal. Neither body is obliged to give victims financial compensation. All stories of conversion therapy end with a queer person debating whether it is still worth living. Expecting victims to enter a lengthy and expensive quasi-judicial process in the hopes that they may receive compensation is a demonstrable failure of this Bill. The Government can ensure victims and survivors receive support by extending the scope of ACC to cover mental injury suffered as a result of conversion therapy.

The Bill creates two criminal offences. Section 8 protects people under 18 and does not require the victim to suffer any harm for prosecution. Section 9 covers all ages and requires the victim to suffer serious harm. Anyone aged 18 or above can only hold their practitioner accountable if they can prove they've suffered serious harm. The Bill defines serious harm as any physical, psychological or emotional harm that seriously and detrimentally affects the individual. Serious harm in criminal law means grievous bodily harm.

Queer people who've experienced conversion therapy are twice as likely to attempt suicide than Queer people who haven't experienced conversion therapy, but this won't be captured by serious harm. Section 9 will become redundant because victims won't meet the unattainable serious harm requirement, leaving people aged 18 and above with no protection. This is a glaring loophole in the Bill. It means that people can practise conversion therapy on an 18-year-old as long as they do not cause them serious harm. Section 8 should cover people of all ages.

The Labour Party has created insurmountable barriers to a prosecution. Section 12 of the Bill states that there will be no prosecutions without the Attorney General's consent. The police can prosecute a case of murder that carries a penalty of life imprisonment without the Attorney General's consent. Section 12 is profoundly concerning. The Attorney General is a member of the Government of the day and has absolute power to decide whether a case will be prosecuted. The National Party has been clear that it would not criminalise people from stopping trans children from being trans. An attorney general of a National government can refuse to prosecute all cases under this ban and immediately render it useless. Section 12 should be removed.

The Labour Party hold a majority at every stage of the process. Whatever Bill we receive after the select committee will be what the Labour Party decide to put in front of us. There is nothing the National or ACT Party can do to stop a ban. The Labour Party must alleviate the collective suffering of Queer people. If they allow this torture to continue, they have failed Queer people.

You can read the Bill in its current form here: https://www.legislation.govt.nz/bill/government/2021/0056/latest/LMS487197.html

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 


Dunne Speaks: Can ACT's Dream Run Continue?

By most reckonings the ACT Party has had a very successful political year. Not only has its expanded Parliamentary team settled in well to its work, without controversy or scandal, but its leader has gained in community respect, and the party’s support, at least according to the public opinion polls, has increased sharply... More>>

Keith Rankin: Basic Universal Income And Economic Rights
"Broad growth is only going to come when you put money in the hands of people, and that's why we talk about a Universal Basic Income". [Ritu Dewan, Indian Society of Labour Economics]. (From How long before India's economy recovers, 'Context India', Al Jazeera, 31 Oct 2021.) India may be to the 'Revolution of the twenty-first century' that Russia was to the 'Revolution of the twentieth century'... More>>

Binoy Kampmark: Foreseeable Risk: Omicron Makes Its Viral Debut
It has been written about more times than any care to remember. Pliny the Elder, that old cheek, told us that Africa always tended to bring forth something new: Semper aliquid novi Africam adferre. The suggestion was directed to hybrid animals, but in the weird pandemic wonderland that is COVID-19, all continents now find themselves bringing forth their types, making their contributions. It just so happens that it’s southern Africa’s turn... More>>



Gasbagging In Glasgow: COP26 And Phasing Down Coal

Words can provide sharp traps, fettering language and caging definitions. They can also speak to freedom of action and permissiveness. At COP26, that permissiveness was all the more present in the haggling ahead of what would become the Glasgow Climate Pact... More>>

Globetrotter: Why Julian Assange’s Inhumane Prosecution Imperils Justice For Us All

When I first saw Julian Assange in Belmarsh prison, in 2019, shortly after he had been dragged from his refuge in the Ecuadorean embassy, he said, “I think I am losing my mind.”
He was gaunt and emaciated, his eyes hollow and the thinness of his arms was emphasized by a yellow identifying cloth tied around his left arm... More>>

Dunne Speaks: Labour's High Water Mark
If I were still a member of the Labour Party I would be feeling a little concerned after this week’s Colmar Brunton public opinion poll. Not because the poll suggested Labour is going to lose office any time soon – it did not – nor because it showed other parties doing better – they are not... More>>