Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search


‘No discernible impact’ from Govt tariff scheme

‘No discernible impact’ from Govt tariff scheme

The Government’s scheme to cut the cost of building houses has resulted in only one-fifth of the touted savings – shaving less than 0.28 per cent off the average new build, Labour’s Housing spokesperson Phil Twyford says.

“Documents obtained by Labour under the Official Information Act show National’s tariff scheme is an utter failure.

“Instead of saving the predicted $3500 on the cost of building a new house, a report by the Ministry of Business, Employment and Innovation found the scheme has ‘not resulted in a discernible impact on the price of construction materials’.

“MBIE estimated the savings per home were more likely to be between $582 and $728 mostly due to the failure of anti-dumping duties to change competition issues in the plasterboard market.

“In fact, the Ministry found even in the best case scenario, a maximum of only $900 would be saved. That’s just 0.28 per cent of the $320,000 Statistics NZ estimates is spent on average building a home.

“Officials have even said those savings would be swallowed up by developers in an overheated market like Auckland.

“This report shows National’s big initiative to cut the cost of building materials hasn’t made a blind bit of difference.

“It is yet another example of this Government making announcements designed to make it look as if it’s doing something about the housing crisis.

“The real problem is anti-competitive rorts in the building supplies market that are stifling competition and driving up the prices paid by home buyers and DIY builders. Kiwis are paying 30 per cent more than Australians and 60 per cent more than Americans for the same building supplies.

“Nick Smith has known about this for the past four years and has not done a thing about it,” Phil Twyford says.


© Scoop Media

Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Gordon Campbell: On Why The Greens Shouldn’t Join The Government

We know she’s a miracle worker, but can Jacinda Ardern really find a cure for capitalism? Tough job. Especially when Ardern is being expected to fix the effects of capitalism – child poverty, unaffordable housing, social inequality – without radically changing the economic structures that keep on generating those outcomes. Unfortunately, Ardern and her Finance Minister Grant Robertson are not by temperament (or by ideology) radical, risk taking politicians... More>>


Poll: Labour On 46%, National 31%, While Greens And ACT Both On 8%

Tonight's political poll puts Labour on 46 percent and National on 31 percent with just one day remaining until election day. More>>


NZ First: Winston Peters Returns To Tauranga In Final Campaign Sprint

NZ First leader Winston Peters is on the final campaign sprint after a marathon tour of the whole country as he fights for his political survival, writes Jo Moir. More>>


Election: Labour Releases Full Manifesto

The Labour Party Manifesto sets the ongoing COVID recovery as the top priority for Government. More>>


NZ First Foundation: Media Companies Lodge Urgent Appeal Over Name Suppression

Media outlets including RNZ are seeking an urgent appeal over name suppression granted to two people charged in the NZ First Foundation donations case. More>>


Judith Collins: Obese People Must Take Responsibility For 'personal Choices'

National Party leader Judith Collins has described obesity as a weakness and says people should not 'blame systems for personal choices'. More>>

Māori Party: Poll Reveals Tamihere On Cusp Of Historic Māori Movement Election Victory

John Tamihere’s election campaign is on the rise and on track to return the Māori Party to parliament, a new Māori TV poll has revealed. The poll released on 11 October during the seventh and final Māori TV Maori Electoral campaign coverage has Tamihere ... More>>

Gordon Campbell: On Four-Year Terms Of Parliament, And On How The US Courts Are Dismantling Democracy

Last week, the issue of four-year parliamentary terms surfaced again. Infuriatingly, it is being discussed purely in terms of its convenience for political parties. They’d get so much more time to enact their policies, free of scrutiny or sanction by voters ... More>>





InfoPages News Channels