Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Work smarter with a Pro licence Learn More

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 

Call for “time out” on dam project

Call for “time out” on dam project

Tom Belford
April 3, 2013

http://www.baybuzz.co.nz/archives/6698/

Last Thursday, you might have missed businessman Colin Crombie’s ‘Talking Point’ column in HB Today calling for a “time out” in the process speeding the Central Hawke’s Bay dam forward.

After reciting a history of delayed, incomplete and contested environmental and economic information on the proposal, he concluded:

“Instead of genuine consultation, the Regional Council has rushed to meet an arbitrary schedule that belies the environmental and financial intricacies of a projected $600 million scheme … the biggest infrastructure investment our region has ever contemplated.

Perhaps the proposed scheme might ultimately meet objectives that all parties could endorse. However, today, with all the uncertainties that persist, no reasonable person in Hawke’s Bay can make that judgment.”

The Regional Council is speeding towards a “call-in” application that would put the matter in the hands of the Environment Minister and a Government-appointed Board of Inquiry.

On behalf of Friends of the Tukituki, Colin has called upon the Environment Minister to “communicate to the HB Regional Council her expectation that, prior to entertaining a ‘call-in’ application, a proper consultation process must be conducted whereby, with all information on the table, the public can assess the full implications of this project, and its desirability as an investment priority for our region.”

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

In other words, the project should be fully consulted here in Hawke’s Bay, now that more complete information is available, and earn a public mandate from our region’s ratepayers before it is considered ripe for Wellington. Colin’s column indicates what that consultation should include:

• Public meetings where pros and cons are presented, not simply the Regional Council’s superficial PowerPoint shows;
• A public hearing conducted by the Regional Council, again with all parties welcome to present (and with Ministry for the Environment observers);
• Once the arguments have been placed on the table, an authentic and objective random survey of Hawke’s Bay residents.

Another group, Transparent Hawke’s Bay (THB), of which I am a member, endorses Colin’s position and is taking the matter further.

We have engaged Wellington law firm Chen Palmer to prepare our case, initially to to the Environment Minister, calling for a pause in the process. In our media release, THB spokesperson Pauline Elliott says:

“We will first take our case directly to the Environment Minister, arguing that the people of Hawke’s Bay deserve, but have been denied, a genuine opportunity to consult on whether or not the proposal stacks up as a sound investment for this region. Only when there is independent evidence supporting the integrity of assumptions made, and a vote of confidence from the people of Hawke’s Bay, should the matter be taken up by the EPA. Transparent Hawke’s Bay will pursue all available steps to achieve this end.

We are talking about the biggest investment undertaken in Hawke’s Bay; the highest debt level of any Regional Council; and the biggest water storage project in New Zealand. The people and ratepayers of Hawke’s Bay have a right to expect confidence in the actions and investments of our Regional Council, and the right to a transparent and accountable process.”

We have compiled a 12-page chronology of what the Regional Council has done — or more to the point, not done — to confer meaningfully with ‘stakeholders’, much less the wider public, on its plans for the dam and Tukituki catchment management. Far from being a model of ‘collaboration’ as the HBRC would have Wellington believe, those of us who, like Colin Crombie, have seen the process up close, know better. And we will be heard.*

Unfortunately, fighting for transparency is costly. Transparent Hawke’s Bay will need contributions from the public to advance its case. In the days ahead, we’ll keep you informed and explain how you can help.

Meantime, you can help immensely by emailing your concerns about the dam, Tukituki water quality, and the Council’s decision-making process directly to Pauline Elliott at pauline.elliott@clear.net.nz. She will collate all messages so they can be included in our brief to the Environment Minister.

Please don’t stand by. This issue is too huge in its implications for Hawke’s Bay … implications for our environment, for sustainable farming, for who owns our region’s water and land, and for our risk and exposure as ratepayers.

*In case you missed, here is the coverage of Hawke’s Bay Today and the Dominion Post on the concerns of Transparent Hawke’s Bay.

ENDS

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

InfoPages News Channels


 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.