Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 

Charles William Williams and others v Auckland Council

Charles William Williams and others v Auckland Council

(CA251/2014)

This summary is provided to assist in the understanding of the Court’s judgment. It does not comprise part of the reasons for that judgment. The full judgment with reasons is the only authoritative document. The full text of the judgment and reasons can be found at Judicial Decisions of Public Interest:

http://www.courtsofnz.govt.nz/from/decisions/judgments.html

The Court of Appeal (Justice Harrison, Justice French and Justice Mallon) has dismissed an appeal by descendants of owners of over 70 hectares of waterfront land at Te Atatu, West Auckland. The land was taken by Auckland Council’s predecessor, the Auckland Harbour Board, in the 1950s to develop a port at Te Atatu. It is now the site of residential housing, a public park, and reserve areas, with a value of up to $70 million.

The owners asked the Court to declare that the Council had to offer the land for sale at 1980s prices back to the owners or their descendants under the Public Works Act 1981, because by the early 1980s the land was no longer going to be used for a port or any other public work.

The Court of Appeal decided the Board did have a duty to offer the land back to four of the seven descendants, because it had acquired the land for a public work in the first place, and by 1982 still held but no longer required the land for any public work. The descendants did not need to prove the Board took their land compulsorily, although the Court said a notice issued by the Board made it clear early on to all the owners that they had to sell their land.


The Court also decided the Council was not able to rely on its 1996 decision to use the exceptions in the Public Works Act. That exception had to be used in a timely way, or else would be lost, meaning that the land had to be offered back.

Auckland Council argued that an Act of Parliament passed in 1983 meant the Council no longer had a duty to offer the land back. But the Court said the Public Works Act was about sale of land while the 1983 Act related only to leases and licences: it did not end the Council’s responsibility to offer the land back to the descendants.

However, the Court decided not to declare that the Council had to offer the land back to the descendants. The descendants had waited too long before bringing their claim, with the consequence that the Council has developed the Te Atatu land into residential housing and a public park that was made possible by levying special rates from the community. The descendants were also not particularly attached to the land. Under agreements they had made with a company that would fund and run this case, the descendants would not keep the land. It would go to the litigation funding company, giving it a windfall because of the substantial difference between the value of the land in the 1980s and its value today.

ENDS

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Gordon Campbell: On Why Raising Corporate Taxes Has Become A Hot New Political Cause

Surprisingly, “raising taxes” has become a very fashionable political idea in 2021. That’s right. After decades of being seen (at best) as a necessary evil, higher corporate taxes are now being treated as the Great Good Thing that will revive the US economy, re-distribute wealth productively, help to build neglected and decaying public infrastructure, fund public health, address social inequality, restore a sense of community and generally make everyone feel better about the society in which they live... More>>

 

Government: Delivers Next Phase Of Climate Action

The Government is delivering on a key election commitment to tackle climate change, by banning new low and medium temperature coal-fired boilers and partnering with the private sector to help it transition away from fossil fuels. This is the first ... More>>

Government: Independent Experts To Advise On Post-Vaccination Future

The Government is acting to ensure decisions on responding to the next phase of the COVID-19 pandemic are informed by the best available scientific evidence and strategic public health advice. “New Zealand has worked towards an elimination ... More>>

Travel: Trans-Tasman Bubble To Start 19 April

New Zealand’s successful management of COVID means quarantine-free travel between New Zealand and Australia will start on Monday 19 April, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern announced today. Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern and COVID-19 Response Minister Chris ... More>>

ALSO:


Health: Drug-Testing Law To Be Made Permanent

Interim legislation that is already proving to keep people safer from drugs will be made permanent, Health Minister Andrew Little says. More>>

World Travel: New Zealand Temporarily Suspending Travel From India - PM Jacinda Ardern

Travel into New Zealand from India - including for New Zealand citizens and residents - is being temporarily suspended because of high numbers of Covid-19 cases. More>>

Finance: Crown Accounts Again Better Than Forecast

Hon Grant Robertson Minister of Finance The economic recovery from COVID-19 continues to be reflected in the Government’s books, which are again better than expected. The Crown accounts for the eight months to the end of February 2021 showed both OBEGAL ... More>>

 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

InfoPages News Channels