Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Work smarter with a Pro licence Learn More

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 

Auditor-General's Review Of The Provincial Growth Fund Reset

We wrote to the Economic Development, Science and Innovation Committee after reviewing how Kānoa – Regional Economic Development and Investment Unit (Kānoa-RDU) managed the repurposing of more than $600 million from the Provincial Growth Fund.

The Provincial Growth Fund was launched in 2018 with $3 billion to be spent over three years to increase growth and development in regional New Zealand.

The repurposing of the Provincial Growth Fund (the PGF reset) occurred in 2020 and was designed to help regional New Zealand recover from the economic impact of the Covid-19 pandemic. The PGF reset introduced additional objectives that prioritised funding to projects that created jobs immediately, could be under way within six months, and would be visible to communities.

The PGF reset was designed and implemented at speed in an uncertain environment, at a time when Kānoa-RDU was experiencing significant staff resourcing challenges. Given these factors, we did not expect to find a perfect process, but we did expect to see one that was fit for purpose.

We found that parts of Kānoa-RDU’s management of the PGF reset went well and largely met our expectations. However, other key elements needed to be in place to help ensure its success. For these reasons, we are not yet certain that Parliament or the public can have confidence that the investments made through the PGF reset will ultimately represent good value for money.

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

Our recent work examining Covid-related spending has often shown that not enough attention is being paid to ensuring that criteria are clear for funding applications, decision-making is transparent and appropriately documented, and the public can see how significant investments are achieving the intended outcomes and represent value for money.

There is a general expectation that public organisations spending public money will demonstrate what is being achieved with it. Significant investments should be appropriately monitored and have their overall outcomes periodically measured and publicly reported. This is not an unreasonable expectation, even in a pandemic.

Our key findings are set out in more detail in Appendix 1 of our letter.

We’d like your feedback: Our website includes a feedback form. Please tell us if you found our information useful.

Read our blog posts to find out more about the work of the Office. We also have Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, and Instagram pages that you can follow.

We are sending you this information because you subscribed to our email notifications list and provided us with your name and contact information. We won’t share your name and contact information with anyone, and we won’t use it for any purpose other than to send you these notifications. Please contact us if you want a copy of your contact information or if you would like to update your details. You can read our privacy statement on our website.

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

InfoPages News Channels


 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.