An Audit Proposal that is Simpler but Effective
A New Election Audit Proposal that is Simpler but Effective
Hello Everyone,
Since it seems to be too complex and not politically viable to require individual calculations of the audit amount for each race, here is a proposal for election audits for auditing 20%, 10%, or 2% of vote counts based on the margins between candidates:
Here is what I suggest:
Margin | Audit Rate | Minimum # of
Counts Audited
0 to 1% | 20% | 80 or 100% of vote
counts whichever is smallest
Margin | Audit Rate |
Minimum # of Counts Audited
1+% to 5% | 10% | 40 or
100% of vote counts whichever is smallest
Margin | Audit
Rate | Minimum # of Counts Audited
5+% to 100% | 2% |
8 or 100% of vote counts whichever is
smallest
**********
The minimum audit amounts are very important to keep the probability for detection high in smaller races and smaller jurisdictions with fewer total counts, where the recommended audit percentages of 20%, 10%, and 2% might not otherwise result in a large enough sample size to ensure detecting outcome-altering vote miscount.
Here is a link to our easy-to-use spreadsheet to check the probabilities of using the above suggested audit rates and minimum amounts.
http://electionarchive.org/ucvAnalysis/US/paper-audits/HowManyToAudit.xls
Kathy
Dopp
http://electionarchive.org
National
Election Data Archive Dedicated to Accurately Counting
Elections
Clean Shipping Coalition: Shipping - IMO’s Net Zero Framework Progresses But ENGOs Slam Unnecessary Delay
Gena Wolfrath, IMI: Understanding News Fatigue—and How To Stay Informed Without Overload
Access Now: A Statement To Our Community About Why RightsCon 2026 Will Not Take Place In Zambia
Climate Action Network: Santa Marta Plants The Seeds Of A Fossil-Free Future - Civil Society Will Hold Governments To Account
Human Rights Measurement Initiative: Joint Statement On The Cancellation Of RightsCon 2026
UN News: From Hormuz To Lebanon, Crisis Reverberates Through Trade Routes, Upending Humanitarian Networks