Iran: Sanctions, harmful to nuclear aims or people
Sanctions on Iran: harmful to nuclear ambitions or to the general population?
In addition to nuclear power, Iran attributes its need for further uranium enrichment to medical needs of civilians - specifically for the treatment of certain cancers.
The current dilemma world leaders, policy makers, and those at the UN now face is how to effectively deal with the threatening possibility of a nuclear Iran, without serving a death sentence to Iran's 850,000 cancer patients, and without creating an economic situation where people are unable to sustain themselves.
The comprehensive economic sanctions the UN Security Council placed on Iraq after the invasion of Kuwait in the early 1990s are seen to have greatly contributed to Iraq's humanitarian crisis and the suffering of the Iraqi people.
Cases such as this, and the current situation in Iran have pushed both policy makers and the public to ask if it is possible to design a set of sanctions that achieve the desired policy objectives without negatively affecting the people by creating food shortages, and health concerns in the target country.
Full Article
ENDS
Clean Shipping Coalition: Shipping - IMO’s Net Zero Framework Progresses But ENGOs Slam Unnecessary Delay
Gena Wolfrath, IMI: Understanding News Fatigue—and How To Stay Informed Without Overload
Access Now: A Statement To Our Community About Why RightsCon 2026 Will Not Take Place In Zambia
Climate Action Network: Santa Marta Plants The Seeds Of A Fossil-Free Future - Civil Society Will Hold Governments To Account
Human Rights Measurement Initiative: Joint Statement On The Cancellation Of RightsCon 2026
UN News: From Hormuz To Lebanon, Crisis Reverberates Through Trade Routes, Upending Humanitarian Networks