Nobel laureate Gerard 't Hooft answers

Nobel laureate Gerard 't Hooft answers

First I must say I admire Professor Gerard 't Hooft for his extraordinairy achievements. The fact that earlier scientists made mistakes, on which Prof. 'Hooft work was based, doesn't deminish his.

Nobel laureate Professor Gerard 't Hooft answered to my email AAAS tolerates Structural Science Fraud . He was not able to disprove the article “ The Equivalence of Magnetic and Kinetic Energy ” despite that this article demonstrates that the premises of Quantum Mechanics (QM) are false and therefore proves QM is an invalid theory.

He states: “I'm not defending Thomson, that was nearly 130 years ago.
”

It is a tragedy that the work of many brlilliant scientists have become absolete, but it is undeniable that the premises on which QM are based are false.

Science and society should take the responsibility and accept historical mistakes and move on.

Journalism should at least do their job and report the public so physical science can progress and discover the mysteries of Ether.

Furthermore it is odd that Prof. 't Hooft doesn't allow to perform the Fundamental Physics Experiment when the expenses will be payed; this experiment is simple to perform and will not aggravate the burden of Prof. 't Hooft physics department.

Confirmation whether proton and electron beam reject or repel can also be measured with a simple compass. When proton and electron beam repel, accordingly to the Electromagnetic Theory, then the measured magnetic field of a proton beam, where the particles move in the same direction as with a electron beam, must be contrary to the field of the electron beam.

For those who want to read the comments of Professor 't Hooft:

http://www.paradox-paradigm.nl/hooft.pdf

Sincerely,

Carel van der Togt

ENDS

© Scoop Media