Video | Agriculture | Confidence | Economy | Energy | Employment | Finance | Media | Property | RBNZ | Science | SOEs | Tax | Technology | Telecoms | Tourism | Transport | Search


Self-regulation of vehicle inspection and licence failed

Self-regulation of vehicle inspection and licence failed, says NZTA chair Stiassny

By Pattrick Smellie

Oct. 15 (BusinessDesk) - Self-regulation by vehicle inspection and licencing providers has failed, says the chair of the New Zealand Transport Agency, Michael Stiassny, who discovered after his appointment in April that they haven't followed up on evidence of non-compliance.

Stiassny has been tasked with moving quickly to change the agency's focus from education to enforcement of non-compliance and clean up what Transport Minister Phil Twyford claimed was years of underfunding and under-performance by the department's administration of vehicle inspection and licencing.

At a press conference with Twyford and NZTA chief executive Fergus Gammie, Stiassny described how the board had uncovered a problem with the way compliance issues were being handled that was serious enough to call in law firm Meredith Connell to review 850 open compliance files, of which 152 require urgent legal or investigative review.

Twyford said the problem boiled down to a combination of "process failures and under-resourcing", which became more acute after restructuring and staff departures in the compliance section of the agency in 2014.

The agency was chaired at the time by current Meridian Energy chairman Chris Moller and led by founder chief executive, Geoff Dangerfield. The National Party leader Simon Bridges served as Minister of Transport from October 2014 to October 2017, but Twyford did not explicitly blame any previous office-holders for the issue, which raises the prospect of an unknown number of vehicle inspectors and licence-issuers having their status either suspended or revoked.

Both Stiassny and Twyford said there was no evidence of deaths or injuries on New Zealand roads as a result of poor compliance and they were unclear yet as to whether findings from the current inquiry could require vehicle re-inspections or some drivers licence holders having to re-sit their tests.

While serious, Twyford said the number of inspection and licence-issuing providers represented only 1.5 percent of the total operating in New Zealand. Some 45,000 providers hold transport service licences and another 12,000 hold vehicle certification licences. Non-compliance was found among both small and large-scale providers, said Stiassny, who expected the numbers of suspensions and revocations reported on the NZTA website would start to increase in coming weeks.

The government's top priority was to investigate and fix the problem. Accountability and possible sanctions or job losses would only be considered once the situation was under control, Twyford said.

In part, the issue's emergence reflected shifting attitudes to health and safety.

"This failure, in my view, was in part a result of a reduced focus on the agency's regulatory role over the last decade," he said. "Staff were redeployed and there was an emphasis on education rather than enforcement. This was exacerbated in 2014 when the agency lost staff from its heavy vehicle compliance team."

The issue disclosed today relates to inspection and certification of all vehicles, not just heavy transport.

Stiassny said that "since Adam was a boy", New Zealanders had known there were some providers who issued warrants of fitness or drivers licences more easily than others, but NZTA had taken a deliberate decision to favour provider education over enforcement.

"Put simply, the way we engaged with people was to work with them in a way that allowed the party concerned to almost drive the agenda rather than, as a regulator, take the necessary steps," said Stiassny. "We have got into a habit of a very self-regulating environment and there are consequences from that."

These included lax vehicle inspections, logbook maintenance and weight recording.

Asked whether there would be job losses at NZTA because of the discovered failings, Stiassny said the first priority was fixing the issue before considering issues of accountability or consequences.

"Today's objective is not a witch-hunt. It is public safety," he said. "To stand everyone down might make some people feel good, but it wouldn't achieve anything."



© Scoop Media

Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines


Industry Report: Growing Interactive Sector Wants Screen Grants

Introducing a coordinated plan that invests in emerging talent and allows interactive media to access existing screen industry programmes would create hundreds of hi-tech and creative industry jobs. More>>


Ground Rules: Government Moves To Protect Best Growing Land

“Continuing to grow food in the volumes and quality we have come to expect depends on the availability of land and the quality of the soil. Once productive land is built on, we can’t use it for food production, which is why we need to act now.” More>>


Royal Society: Calls For Overhaul Of Gene-Technology Regulations

An expert panel considering the implications of new technologies that allow much more controlled and precise ‘editing’ of genes, has concluded it’s time for an overhaul of the regulations and that there’s an urgent need for wide discussion and debate about gene editing... More>>


Retail: Card Spending Dips In July

Seasonally-adjusted electronic card spending dipped in July by 0.1 percent after being flat in June, according to Stats NZ. Economists had expected a 0.5 percent lift, according to the median in a Bloomberg poll. More>>


Product Stewardship: Govt Takes More Action To Reduce Waste

The Government is proposing a new way to deal with environmentally harmful products before they become waste, including plastic packing and bottles, as part of a wider plan to reduce the amount of rubbish ending up in landfills. More>>


Earnings Update: Fonterra Sees Up To $675m Loss On Writedowns

“While the Co-op’s FY19 underlying earnings range is within the current guidance of 10-15 cents per share, when you take into consideration these likely write-downs, we expect to make a reported loss of $590-675 million this year, which is a 37 to 42 cent loss per share." More>>