World Video | Defence | Foreign Affairs | Natural Events | Trade | NZ in World News | NZ National News Video | NZ Regional News | Search

 


UN Indigenous Peoples Declaration VotePostponed

Vote On UN Declaration On Indigenous Peoples Postponed

By Andreas von Warburg

UNITED NATIONS - It’s a sad day for indigenous peoples of all corners of the world. The Third Committee of the General Assembly has delayed a vote on the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People, a landmark text passed by the newly created UN Human Rights Council last June and openly opposed by CANZUS – namely Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and the United States.

The vote was postponed after the Committee, responsible for social, humanitarian, and cultural issues, approved a proposal by a group of African countries for additional negotiations, allowing more time to discuss new amendments.

“We are […] concerned that the Human Rights Council and its President rejected calls that we and others, such as Canada, made urging for more time to improve the text so that it could enjoy universal support,” said Ambassador Rosemary Banks, Permanent Representative of New Zealand to the United Nations, in a statement on behalf of CANZUS last October, during the debate in the Third Committee. “This process is extraordinary in any multilateral negotiation and sets a poor precedent with respect to the work and role of the Human Rights Council.”

CANZUS is opposing the draft text of the Declaration not on principle. “What the world needs is a declaration that can make a practical and positive difference in the lives of indigenous peoples in every region,” Ambassador Banks said in her statement. “Instead, the text before us is confusing, unworkable, contradictory and deeply flawed.”

CANZUS believes that flaws in this text run through all of its most significant provisions, including those on self-determination, veto power, and lands and resources. The text also lacks a definition of “indigenous peoples” and a scope of application, which could potentially mean that separatist or minority groups may be given a legal basis to claim the right of self-determination.

“The current text of the declaration does not meet these objectives. The wording leaves too much open to interpretation and does not provide effective guidance regarding how indigenous governments might work with other levels of government,” Jim Prentice, Canadian Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development, wrote in an open letter published by the Toronto Star this week. “As is evident, we are not the only ones with concerns. A number of countries have made statements in relation to the draft declaration – even those voting for adoption.”

A few weeks ago, a group of 11 Ambassadors to the United Nations – Andorra, Bolivia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Guatemala, Liechtenstein, Mexico, Norway, Panama, Peru, and Switzerland – called upon all UN Member States to support the adoption of the Declaration by the General Assembly as an historic step towards building better societies. “This landmark Declaration constitutes a legitimate and longstanding demand of indigenous peoples thorough the world,” a joint letter reads. “There is an urgent need for our Governments and our societies to recognize the unique heritage and contributions of indigenous peoples and to protect and promote their human rights.”

The faith of the Declaration is still uncertain. “I understand why governments may have concerns. This is not just a statement of indigenous hopes,” said Robert Coulter, executive director of the Indian Law Resource Center and one of the original authors of the declaration, to the American Indian news service. “It is reasonable, fair, and enormously important to indigenous peoples. The declaration must be adopted immediately; we have worked for nearly 30 years and we are prepared to continue fighting for adoption of the declaration for as long as it takes.”

ENDS

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
World Headlines

 

At The UN: Paris Climate Agreement Moves Closer To Entry Into Force

The Paris Agreement on climate change moved closer toward entering into force in 2016 as 31 more countries joined the agreement today at a special event hosted by United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon. More>>

ALSO:

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The End Game In Spain (And Other World News)

The coverage of international news seems almost entirely dependent on a random selection of whatever some overseas news agency happens to be carrying overnight... Here are a few interesting international stories that have largely flown beneath the radar this past week. More>>

Amnesty/Human Rights Watch: Appalling Abuse, Neglect Of Refugees On Nauru

Refugees and asylum seekers on Nauru, most of whom have been held there for three years, routinely face neglect by health workers and other service providers who have been hired by the Australian government, as well as frequent unpunished assaults by local Nauruans. More>>

ALSO:

Other Australian Detention

Gordon Campbell: On The Censorship Havoc In South Africa’s State Broadcaster

Demands have included an order to staff that there should be no further negative news about the country’s President Jacob Zuma, and SABC camera operators responsible for choosing camera angles that have allegedly made the President ‘look shorter’ were to be retrained... More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On A Bad Week For Malcolm Turnbull, And The Queen

Malcolm Turnbull’s immediate goal – mere survival – is still within his grasp... In every other respect though, this election has been a total disaster for the Liberals. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On Bidding Bye Bye To Boris

Boris Johnson’s exit from the contest for Conservative Party leadership supports the conspiracy theory that he never really expected the “Leave” option to win the referendum – and he has no intention now of picking up the poisoned chalice that managing the outcome will entail... More>>

ALSO:

Get More From Scoop

 
 
 
 
 
World
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news