Port of Auckland - Questions and Answers
www.facebook.com/yourportyourcall
Port Project – Your Port/Your
Call
Q&As
Where did the
information about the port expansion come
from?
The port expansion plans are found
in technical documents supporting the Waterfront Draft Plan.
They are also published in the Ports of Auckland (POAL) Port
Development Plan and on their website.
Where did the
before and after images of the port come from? What
information are they based on?
The images
are produced by a commercial company experienced in
producing accurate landscape simulations.
How
can you be sure the images are an accurate reflection of
what expansion changes will look like?
The
images are to a consentable quality. They are scaled off the
port’s own plans.
What is council’s
involvement in the expansion plans?
The
Auckland Council owns Ports of Auckland and is also the
governing body that must approve the port’s plans. Once
they pass the plans contained in the Auckland Draft Plan, a
case can be made that they have been consulted on so
subsequently it is difficult to have them modified.
Why
is there no mention of the POAL expansion plans in the Draft
Waterfront Plan (part of the greater Draft Auckland
Plan)
No-one is quite sure…we asked that
question too. We assume POAL will claim the single image
contained within the City Centre masterplan (p 177) and the
Auckland Waterfront plan spell out the expansion. This is
despite the fact the plan claims that “the Port will
continue to develop largely on its current footprint”
(p13).
What can I do to voice my opinion on the
plans?
Unfortunately, public submissions
on the Draft Plan closed on 31 October 2011.
There is a
Facebook page at ( www.facebook.com/yourportyourcall )
where your opinion can be heard. ‘Like’ the page to show
you support a re-think on the port’s expansion and share
it with others you think should be informed.
You can also write to Mayor Brown and Ports of Auckland chair Richard Pearson and copy the NZ Herald and your local paper. The New Zealand Herald is also running a feedback forum on its website www.nzherald.co.nz
Council is currently considering the submissions to this plan prior to adopting it at the end of March and we do know from past experience that a vocal public response is effective in changing the direction of these plans – it is late, but it’s not too late!
When is the port
expansion happening?
The council votes to
approve the draft plan in late March. Construction of the
expansion would be a long term process that could go on for
30 years or more. Once the expansion is consented the port
is legislatively protected and entitled to proceed with the
expansion. The ability to overturn the consent is extremely
difficult and expensive.
What is the council approval
process?
The Auckland Council owns POAL
and is also the body that must approve the port’s plans.
The council goes in to closed-door meetings to discuss the
plan in February. Councillors vote on the district plan in
late March and if it’s approved in principle, the port’s
plans will be very difficult to stop.
What authority
does Ports of Auckland have to do
this?
The Port has gained a designation
called PMA1 for this expansion programme. A designation is a
precursor to gaining a resource consent. There are many
similar designations across Auckland for large
infrastructure projects that protect areas for potential
development. Typically they are for mortorways and rail
tracks but in most cases they are just that – protection
– this does not mean the city needs to exercise the right
to develop them. Once designated, POAL then needs its plans
approved by council – which itself owns the company - and
that’s why it’s important for Auckland citizens to make
their voices heard.
How much new space do they
want?
If approved by council, the
container terminal will be greatly increased in size – so
much so there will be a 400 per cent increase in container
traffic - from the existing 890,000 containers p.a. to 3.5
million p.a. The size equates to 267,000 sq m or 16 x the
size of Eden Park.
Will a port expansion mean bigger
ships in the harbour?
Yes. The largest
container vessels that use the Auckland Port carry 4,100
containers. The new generation of container vessels due to
arrive in Auckland will carry 7,000 containers. They are 320
metres long. The larger cranes required to service them are
96 metres tall (more than 25 storeys high). They can only be
berthed at high tide but there will need to be some dredging
at the port’s edge so they can remain berthed at low tide.
Surely increased traffic and business is good for the
city?
No one is opposed to increased
business but Heart of the City and others are opposed to the
port expansion as it is currently proposed. There are
substantial corollary implications for Auckland e.g. the
greater demand for container traffic on our roads and rail.
Note that within the port’s plan it has made the case for
tax- and ratepayer funded road and rail infrastructure
‘terminating at the Port’ currently estimated at $1.7
billion. We also believe that some 30% of the existing
containers landed at the port are transhipments which could
be readily handled by another North Island port rather than
on a CBD waterfront.
Why haven’t we heard about this
before?
That’s a question better asked
of both the council and the port company. While the Draft
Auckland Plan has plenty of glossy pictures showing planned
future development for the city, for some reason there is no
real detail about the port’s expansion plans. You can see
the wharves are bigger but there is no mention of expansion
plans in any of the accompanying captions.
What has
this got to do with the current waterfront
strikes?
Ports management has confirmed
that is it gearing for growth – and that growth will be
reliant at least in part on the port pushing through its
expansion plans. The current labour situation is a short
term issue and most people anticipate it will be resolved
this year by the ports management and the union. But the
expansion plans are a long term issue with wide ranging
corollary implications for the shape of our waterfront and
traffic to and from the port – the expansion plans are an
issue of trusteeship of the Port AND of our waterfront and
city which is why the decisions here need to be made by
council.
How much will the expansion cost Auckland
ratepayers?
We simply don’t know at this
stage. Note that within the port’s plan it has made the
case for tax- and ratepayer funded road and rail
infrastructure ‘terminating at the Port’ currently
estimated at $1.7 billion.
What’s Mayor Brown’s
position on this?
We understand the mayor
supports the district plan in general and can only assume he
must also be aware of the port’s growth plans. But
specifically we have not been able to get a firm answer as
to whether or not he supports the port’s expansion
plans.
How long is the development going to
take?
Work could go on for 30 years or
more. Do you want your waterfront to be crammed with
containers, construction trucks and roading restrictions for
the next 30 years? Especially when some experts maintain the
expansion of container traffic can be easily accommodated
between Northland, Auckland and Bay of Plenty ports.
Why does the port company need all this new
space?
That’s a question for the port
company. There is some information here http://tinyurl.com/7c68f9b and
here http://tinyurl.com/7tau6zw but
there is little mention of the extent of the expansion.
Certainly, there are no images illustrating the
extraordinary expansion into the Waitemata Harbour. It’s
clearly not in the port’s interest to show Aucklanders how
expansion will substantially change the visual landscape of
their city.
Where can I find out more about what the
ports have planned?
In all the documents
associated with the council’s Auckland plan there appears
to be only one that shows some of the expansion and even on
that plan there is no mention that the company wants to
expands its wharves so dramatically. The POAL website does
however show the expansion plans in a document titled Port
Development Plan 2008.
Why are you objecting to the
port’s plans?
The harbour is a jewel in
Auckland’s crown. It’s our playground. We all share a
responsibility to enhance and protect our natural assets and
pass them on as best as we can to future generations. We are
not owners of the land – we are custodians of it for
generations to come. Aucklanders deserve to have a say on
one of its precious assets. The plans run roughshod over so
many principles Aucklanders hold dear to their hearts –
access to the waterfront; recreational use of the harbour;
views of the harbour from the city and Parnell and city
views from the North Shore. The spotlight needs to go on
what the port is trying to do so that Aucklanders are fully
informed and can have their say on port expansion - before
it’s too late.
Are you opposed to all Port
development?
No - the port is a valuable
part of the Auckland and NZ economy and no-one is interested
in standing in the way of progress. But the council has only
been presented one expansion plan, which will have a
significant impact on waterfront access, infrastructure
development and how Aucklanders and visitors view our
harbour. We believe the council needs to be presented with
more options which is why it should NOT approve the
container wharf plans. An independent review will provide
Aucklanders with a range of options for ports efficiency in
the North Island.
To find out more and to have your say about the Ports of Auckland plans go to www.facebook.com/youportyourcall and ‘Like’ the page, leave a comment, read more about the plans and see the video.
ENDS
Gordon Campbell: On Children’s Book Classics - The Moomins
Zero Waste Network Aotearoa: Container Return Scheme Bill Would Double Recycling Rates And Put Money Back In Households
Wellington City Council: Statement From The Wellington Mayoral Forum On Options For Regional Governance Reform
MUNZ: TAIC Report On Kaitaki Incident Gives Shocking Picture Of Decline Of NZ Maritime Infrastructure
Greenpeace: New Climate Report Yet More Reason To Reduce Dairy Herd
Better Public Media: Opposing Plans To Scrap The BSA
Internal Affairs: Citizenship Test For Citizenship By Grant Applicants From Late 2027

