Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Work smarter with a Pro licence Learn More

Local Govt | National News Video | Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Search


Councillors Green Light Proposed Otago Regional Policy Statement To Be Publicly Notified

Following delivery of a recommendations report by the two Independent Hearings Panels over

the Proposed Otago Regional Policy Statement (pORPS), ORC’s Councillors yesterday accepted

the report and moved to publicly notify the document.

The pORPS will be publicly notified, on 30 March 2024, on ORC’s website, with the Panel’s

decision also available on the site.

The decision to accept both the freshwater and non-freshwater recommendations was made

in the non-public part of yesterday’s full Council meeting, because the Panel’s report and

recommendations are subject to appeals.

“The pORPS shapes the management of Otago’s resources and will be important for, among

other things the Land and Water Regional Plan,” says ORC’s Chair Gretchen Robertson.

“We thank the Panel for providing their well thought out report and decision, and for the many submitters

who committed a great deal of time to prepare and present to the Panel. This was a robust process with

plenty of good evidence provided,” Cr Robertson says.

The adoption of the decision by Council now moves the RPS into the next phase of the process, says ORC’s

General Manager Policy and Science, Anita Dawe.

Submitters can now lodge legal appeals on decisions, as provided by the Resource Management Act, for each

respective part, be it the freshwater part or non-freshwater part; within 30 working days to the Environment

Court or 15 working days to the High Court.

Definition- Freshwater part and non-freshwater part

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

The freshwater part covers the regulation, environmental protections and water quantity and quality

for lakes and dams and rivers and streams across Otago. The non-freshwater part covers coast, air, urban

areas, wetlands, regionally significant issues, natural features and landscapes, ecosystems and indigenous

biodiversity, hazards and risks and manawhenua issues.

Ms Dawe says the appeal periods and Panel’s decision will be loaded to the ORC’s website on Saturday, 30 March.

Intent and process of the Regional Policy Statement

The RPS identifies the regionally significant issues around the management of Otago’s natural and physical

resources and sets out what needs to be achieved through ‘objectives’ and the way in which they will be

achieved, through policies and methods.

Cr Robertson says the RPS provides an overview of the resource management issues of the region and policies

and methods to achieve integrated management of the natural and physical resources of the region.

As a result of the Council adopting the recommendations yesterday, for the time being it is still a ‘proposed Plan’

until the appeals period is resolved, she says.

Cr Robertson says regional and district plans of councils must “give effect to” and implement Regional Policy Statements.

“It’s a strong directive which creates a firm obligation on the part of those subject to it,” she says.

For those applying for resource consents, the RPS will better define the objectives and applicants’ obligations

to protect and enhance for more positive environmental outcomes, be they affecting land, water, air, ecosystems

or biodiversity, she says.

Splitting the pORPS into freshwater and non-freshwater

There was a legal requirement (detailed below) to split the pORPS – into freshwater and non-freshwater

parts – which resulted in about 45 provisions considered to relate directly to the management of freshwater

quality or quantity, with those provisions forming the freshwater part of the pORPS.

Ms Dawe noted the Panel’s decision drew together again both the freshwater and non-freshwater parts

and was presented as one “integrated document”.

Anyone who had already submitted on the identified freshwater provisions had to resubmit on that part

for their submissions to be able to be considered, Ms Dawe says.

The balance of the pORPS, being the non-freshwater parts, were not required to be re-notified so all

submissions on the provisions in the non-freshwater part of the pORPS remained in place.

The non-freshwater part of the pORPS was the larger of the two documents.

Submissions closed in November 2022. The Panel appointed to hear both the non-freshwater and freshwater

submissions on the pORPS were Ron Crosby (Chair), Bianca Sullivan, Allan Cubitt and Rauru Kirikiri. The public

hearings were held over January-February 2023.

Why was there a new submission process?

In June 2021, ORC publicly notified its pORPS, determining at the that time the whole of the pORPS was a

freshwater planning instrument’.

Declarations on that definition were then sought in the High Court by ORC and Royal Forest and Bird

Protection Society of New Zealand.

The High Court’s decision in July found the ORC erred in determining that the whole of its pORPS was a

freshwater instrument, and directed the ORC split the pORPS into two parts; those which relate to freshwater

and those which do not. That is why submissions were again sought on the freshwater provisions.

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines




InfoPages News Channels


Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.