“If Not Them, Then Who?” Auditor-General Declines Tauranga Council Scrutiny, Exposing Oversight Black Hole
Tauranga, 31 August 2025 – The Auditor-General has again refused to investigate a string of controversial Tauranga City Council decisions, despite repeated requests from MPs across party lines, councillors, and Lobby for Good. The response leaves one significant question hanging: if the Auditor-General won’t step in, then who will?
At stake are multi-million-dollar deals, the sale of the Tauranga Marine Precinct, land purchases on Durham Street and Devonport Road, and the $300M civic centre redevelopment Te Manawataki o Te Papa. Each of them sparking community concern over reckless asset sales, questionable valuations, and decision-making behind closed doors.
Yet the Auditor-General’s line has stayed the same, these are “policy choices,” not matters for inquiry.
“Councils can sell public assets at half
their value, shut residents out, or push through deals with
conflicts of interest, be economical with the truth, and
still dodge scrutiny because it’s technically ‘within
their powers,’” said Erika Harvey, Director of Public
Affairs at Lobby for Good.
“That means ordinary people
have no way to challenge bad decisions without risking
hundreds of thousands in legal costs. That’s an
accountability gap big enough to drive a superyacht
through.”
A broken system only the wealthy can challenge
The Marine Precinct sale shows what’s broken. Valued at over $30 million, it was sold for just $13.9 million, with ratepayers still on the hook for up to another $29 million in upgrades that will benefit the new owner.
Advertisement - scroll to continue readingCouncil has told local workboats they’ll “have a place to go,” but what’s being told to them doesn’t match what’s being said in emails or internal documents. Right now, families and businesses only have short-term leases with the new owner to berth, load and unload vessels, shift gear, offload fish, and fuel up until next year. After that, there’s no real plan on the table. Behind the scenes, council is spinning a different story to keep this from coming out publicly.
“When those leases expire, what then? Do we tell fishing families and marine businesses ‘sorry, we missed the deadline’?” said Erika Harvey, Director of Public Affairs at Lobby for Good. “This isn’t just about a bad balance sheet or questional financial decisions, it’s about livelihoods being pushed out by a system designed to favour wealthy insiders.”
Local marine operators tried to fight the deal in court, but were forced to withdraw when Tauranga City Council pushed the sale through while an appeal hearing was scheduled only days away. Key evidence held by industry members was never presented to the court, and at the same time, Mayor Mahé Drysdale warned that if users of the Marine Precicnt didn’t give up, council would pursue them for its own legal costs. Faced with that threat, and potential liability in the millions, they could not continue.
“This system is rigged so only those with deep pockets can fight,” Harvey said. “That’s not democracy, it’s more like civic suppression.”
Auditor-General passes the parcel
The Auditor-General has acknowledged transparency concerns but instead suggested the Council “consider” publishing more information. In some cases, the OAG even pointed residents to the Ombudsman, effectively restarting the complaints process from scratch.
“The
public deserves better than a bureaucratic game of
pass-the-parcel,” Harvey said.
“Oversight shouldn’t
be about technicalities. It should be about trust and
accountability.”
Reforms on the table
Lobby for Good has outlined a set of reforms they are lobbying on to help close the gap and will be launching a petition this week.
- Independent Local Government Ombudsman – free, accessible escalation for residents.
- Citizen oversight committees – reviewing major asset sales before they’re signed.
- Accessible dispute resolution – a “Disputes Tribunal” for local government, so justice isn’t just for the rich.
- Mandatory transparency rules – councils must prove they consulted and considered public input.
- Enhanced legal aid – so residents can actually challenge deals that fail the sniff test.
Standing up for the public interest
Lobby for Good says legal experts like Kirsten Murfitt, who have worked pro bono for their organisation on these cases, has faced pushback and a series of issues for speaking up.
“Instead of being thanked, she’s been targeted by insiders who want to shut her down,” Harvey said. “That tells you how deep the resistance to transparency runs.”
The bottom line
Until the system changes, the public’s only leverage is exposure, pressure, and collective action.
“When even the Auditor-General admits
transparency is lacking, the question isn’t whether the
public has a right to know, it’s why that right keeps
being denied,” Harvey said.
“We need system change.
Because right now, secrecy seems to win….every
time.”
Call to Action
Lobby for Good is launching a national campaign to flip the system.
- Sign the petition for independent oversight being launched by the end of this week.
- Join as a monthly member $10 a month powers document access, investigations, and public campaigns.
- Share this story because when the public knows, the game changes.


Gordon Campbell: On Children’s Book Classics - The Moomins
Johnnie Freeland: Ko Tātou Tātou - Climate Action In Aotearoa Begins With Relationship
Zero Waste Network Aotearoa: Container Return Scheme Bill Would Double Recycling Rates And Put Money Back In Households
Wellington City Council: Statement From The Wellington Mayoral Forum On Options For Regional Governance Reform
MUNZ: TAIC Report On Kaitaki Incident Gives Shocking Picture Of Decline Of NZ Maritime Infrastructure
Greenpeace: New Climate Report Yet More Reason To Reduce Dairy Herd
Better Public Media: Opposing Plans To Scrap The BSA

