Major Contradiction On Kyoto Protocol
13 February 2002
Major Contradiction Between PM And Govt Statement Over Kyoto
The Governments' National Interest Analysis on Kyoto contradicts the Prime Minister's statement to Parliament, says Business NZ.
On Tuesday the Prime Minister told Parliament that NZ would not have to introduce cost-incurring measures until 2008.
But the Analysis released yesterday says NZ must "make demonstrable progress, by 2005, toward achieving its commitments under the Protocol".
Business NZ Chief Executive Simon Carlaw says this is a major contradiction.
"If we have to show progress by 2005, that means we have to start cutting emissions next year.
"The majority of submissions on Kyoto said the NZ Government is moving too fast. The National Interest Analysis shows just how quickly the costs will begin to bite.
"The National Analysis Statement (page 36) quotes costs such as a 25% drop in returns from dairy products as a result of ratifying. How this outcome would propel NZ into the top half of the OECD is a mystery.
"There is absolutely no need for NZ to rush ahead of other countries to ratify the Kyoto Protocol. The variance between the Prime Minister's statement and the Government's National Interest Analysis should be a wake-up call," Mr Carlaw said.
Ends
Google Threat Intelligence Group - GTIG: Google Threat Report Warns AI-Driven Cyber Operations Are Scaling Across Global Threat Landscape
Commerce Commission: Baseline Research Report On The State Of Competition In New Zealand
University of Auckland: Junk Food Designed To Make Us Eat More, Study Finds
Spark: New Report Sets Out Outcomes-Led Approach To Lift Rural Connectivity Using The Right Mix Of Technologies
Bill Bennett: Fixed Voice Rules Head For Deregulation
UN Department of Global Communications: United Nations Proposes New Global Dashboard To Measure Progress Beyond GDP

