Debate on health funding needed
14 October 2004
Debate on health funding needed
Debating alternative approaches to health funding is positive, says Business NZ.
"If we are heading towards a public health system that we can't afford, as suggested by the Health Funds Association, then we need to look at all options," Business NZ Acting CEO Tim Cleary said.
"Differing views on cost inflation and productivity in the health sector doesn't mean we shouldn't debate the issue.
"The Association has made a reasonable suggestion that we consider the Australian system which allows a 30 per cent rebate on health insurance premiums.
"This would give an incentive for people to take responsibility for their own healthcare, so reducing costs in the public system.
"It would also help alleviate the unfairness of the burden on insurance holders who pay twice for health coverage - in their insurance and also in their taxes.
"In many other areas we are considering harmonising our practices with Australia's - this is an important issue that deserves as much debate as possible."
ENDS
University of Auckland: Junk Food Designed To Make Us Eat More, Study Finds
Spark: New Report Sets Out Outcomes-Led Approach To Lift Rural Connectivity Using The Right Mix Of Technologies
Bill Bennett: Fixed Voice Rules Head For Deregulation
UN Department of Global Communications: United Nations Proposes New Global Dashboard To Measure Progress Beyond GDP
Banking Ombudsman Scheme: Fraud Check Delays Well Worth The Inconvenience, Says Banking Ombudsman
Asia Pacific AML: NZ’s Financial Crime Gap - Beyond The 'Number 8 Wire' Mentality

