We won't call it picking winners, we'll call it focused effort - the next agenda for our science and innovation?
By Peter Kerr for sticK
(sticK - 7 April 2011 ) There's a very interesting 'occasional paper' that's just gone up on the MED website.
By its name 'Enhancing Productivity: Towards an Updated Action Agenda' you wouldn't pick it to be a slightly subversive document.
But, along with hints coming out of the general science and innovation agenda, this thought piece by MED economist Roger Procter ('not necessarily reflecting the views of the Ministry of Economic Development') lays out some logic for picking winners.
That's my term, and in fairness to Roger, he never uses it. Perhaps focused effort would be a better short hand, and go down better across the road at The Treasury.
For sticK – science, technology, innovation & commercialisation KNOWLEDGE - is a new Wellington based news service concentrating on following the money from ideas to income. Contact editor Peter Kerr at peter.kerr055 @ gmail.com

University of Auckland: Junk Food Designed To Make Us Eat More, Study Finds
Spark: New Report Sets Out Outcomes-Led Approach To Lift Rural Connectivity Using The Right Mix Of Technologies
Bill Bennett: Fixed Voice Rules Head For Deregulation
UN Department of Global Communications: United Nations Proposes New Global Dashboard To Measure Progress Beyond GDP
Banking Ombudsman Scheme: Fraud Check Delays Well Worth The Inconvenience, Says Banking Ombudsman
Asia Pacific AML: NZ’s Financial Crime Gap - Beyond The 'Number 8 Wire' Mentality

