U Drive Mobility wheelchair car shutdown
U Drive Mobility wheelchair car shutdown second anniversary June 26 2013-2015
After certifying 9 NZ designed and built Drive from Wheelchair cars, 2 years ago the Low Volume Vehicle Technical Association (LVVTA) ordered U Drive Mobility (UDM) to close down their vehicle production, 5 months later deregistering all UDM vehicles with an official NZTA press release citing 3 suspected safety issues
1. The floor was too weak! LVVTA calculation
of 300Kg (1/2 the required strength)
WRONG, Experts
report proved floor @ 1400Kg (twice the required
strength)
2. The glue was weak and could allow the floor
to fall out!
WRONG! Experts report proved Epoxy bond
requires minimum of 300 tonnes force to remove it by label
calculation!
3. The rear suspension has excessive bump
steer
WRONG! Suspension expert bumpsteer perfectly
acceptable when measured correctly!
After a comprehensive
NZTA commissioned qualified experts report put paid to the
3 suspected safety issues, UDM clients cars were eventually
reregistered after 12 months under an owners exemption that
left their uncertified $100,000 cars worthless, and UDM
marginalized, unable to carry on manufacture at present in
New Zealand.
Those responsible for the LVVTA engineering
report that wrongfully deregistered the cars remain
uncensured, and in fact promoted within the LVVTA system,
with no apology or admission they got it so completely
wrong!
During this 2 year period UDM can confirm that UDM cars successfully completed crash testing in Paris, June last year, and with cars already in European production, have completed accreditation for Full ECE/EU (United Nations standard) whole of vehicle approval for certification in September this year, the highest homologation standard available, and the first and only accreditation for a NZ designed and built vehicle ever, with automatic NZ entry as a world class vehicle.
The UDM experience leaves no confidence in the LVVTA, who remain unable to certify a domestic designed and built production car, instead relying on foreign certification. This situation requires a comprehensive independent enquiry into all of its associated operations of certification before more innovation and expertese is lost to New Zealand.
ENDS