Video | Agriculture | Confidence | Economy | Energy | Employment | Finance | Media | Property | RBNZ | Science | SOEs | Tax | Technology | Telecoms | Tourism | Transport | Search

 

Government must fix its broken procurement process


The inefficient, inconsistent and ineffective ways in which the Government is procuring public buildings could be costing New Zealand many millions of dollars a year, according to a report commissioned by the New Zealand Institute of Architects.


The report, Improving Government Procurement of Architectural Services, by researcher Leah Singer, is based on interviews with scores of architects about their experiences with Government building procurement processes.

The report, compiled in conjunction with the University of Otago, suggests that “New Zealand public sector procurement of architectural services suffers from a multidimensional systemic failure that relates to weaknesses in culture, capability and accountability.”

“These weaknesses undermine not only the Government’s own procurement principles but also its own end – the maximisation of public value.”

Singer’s report finds that a concentration on driving down the costs of public projects and inappropriately managing the risks of delivering them often leads public sector agencies to ignore the whole-of-life performance of buildings and their wider economic, social and environmental value.

Immediate consequences of public sector “value engineering” can include the substitution of environmentally certified materials and energy-efficient systems in proposed buildings.

The wider effects of a commodity approach to the production of public buildings, the report suggests, are to dissuade talented architects from working on public projects and impede the development of a sustainable construction industry.

This approach, the report adds, discourages upskilling and innovation in an industry that is challenged by the scale and complexity of modern construction projects.

Paradoxically, the fixation on immediate costs can have the effect of inflating the final cost of building projects.

Singer’s research indicates that the present procurement regime imposes unnecessary time-consuming and costly demands on contractual partners, disregarding Treasury’s instruction to state agencies to avoid “wasted time, effort and resources in achieving the Government’s objectives.”

Citing estimates from the Project Management Institute and the World Economic Forum Singer writes that “mismanagement and inefficiency” can account for 10% to 30% of project costs. Given the New Zealand Government’s previously projected 2017–2020 project spend of $32.5 billion, wastage could run into billions of dollars over that period.

Singer notes in her report that the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment sets out in the document Government Rules of Sourcing five ‘Principles of Government Procurement’: “plan and manage for great results; be fair to all suppliers; get the right supplier; get the best deal for everyone; play by the rules”.

Singer’s research suggests these principles do not seem to be governing the procurement practices of many public sector agencies.

Contrary to the these procurement principles, respondents to Singer’s survey report that state agencies often issue inadequate design briefs with insufficient information on budgets and timelines.

State agencies, the report finds, often request information irrelevant to a project’s type or scale, and run a wasteful process in which changes are often made to the scope of project during tendering.

An especially onerous characteristic of Government procurement behaviour is an increasing resistance to the use of standard contracts for services.

A reported insistence by myriad public agencies on bespoke contracts with uninsurable and impractical requirements is imposing considerable unnecessary legal fees on architects, and causing them to lose productive time.

There are deeper concerns, too, about the lack of transparency in the Government procurement process, an absence of feedback to participants in public sector tenders, a mistrustful relationship between those setting and those replying to tenders, and a race-to-the-bottom focus on suppressing design fees.

Specific industry feedback cited by Singer is that “government employees don’t know much about the building industry” and have “no real understanding about the design process and how it works.”

“In short,” Singer concludes, “the only constant within the procurement of architectural services is a high variability of skill attitude and compliance”.

One result of these shortcomings is a perceived reliance on tick-the-box tendering decision-making that favours factors such as company size and longevity over design creativity and innovation.

Singer notes such a procurement tendency contrasts with the Qualification-Based Selection process implemented in the United States.

A guiding principle of the U.S. procurement system is that “the most qualified firm should not be construed as the largest or longest-tenured firm, but the firm that is the best match for the project scope, size, location and other factors”.

The American system allows for “objective and subjective criteria such as innovation, unique design approaches, sustainable design and total life cost of the project,” and focuses procurement on “the value the building delivers”.

In contrast, Singer’s report suggests, New Zealand Government procurement focuses, at the expense of the greater societal benefit, to “delivering the building”.

There is hope in Singer’s report. Recent company failures in the construction industry, the scale of the Government’s infrastructure and housing programmes and the Office of the Auditor Generals’ interest in public sector procurement mean the time is right to implement adherence across the public sector to the ‘Five Principles of Government Procurement’.

“The Government should become what the World Economic Forum calls an ‘intelligent client’, that is a client that truly understands the market, their impact on it, and the huge amount of value that can be unlocked though adept project management, informed risk share and exemplary design.”

Improving Government Procurement of Architectural Services is available on the New Zealand Institute of Architects website here.


A media release from the New Zealand Institute of Architects.

Government must fix its broken procurement process
The inefficient, inconsistent and ineffective ways in which the Government is procuring public buildings could be costing New Zealand many millions of dollars a year, according to a report commissioned by the New Zealand Institute of Architects.
The report, Improving Government Procurement of Architectural Services, by researcher Leah Singer, is based on interviews with scores of architects about their experiences with Government building procurement processes.

The report, compiled in conjunction with the University of Otago, suggests that “New Zealand public sector procurement of architectural services suffers from a multidimensional systemic failure that relates to weaknesses in culture, capability and accountability.”

“These weaknesses undermine not only the Government’s own procurement principles but also its own end – the maximisation of public value.”

Singer’s report finds that a concentration on driving down the costs of public projects and inappropriately managing the risks of delivering them often leads public sector agencies to ignore the whole-of-life performance of buildings and their wider economic, social and environmental value.

Immediate consequences of public sector “value engineering” can include the substitution of environmentally certified materials and energy-efficient systems in proposed buildings.

The wider effects of a commodity approach to the production of public buildings, the report suggests, are to dissuade talented architects from working on public projects and impede the development of a sustainable construction industry.

This approach, the report adds, discourages upskilling and innovation in an industry that is challenged by the scale and complexity of modern construction projects.

Paradoxically, the fixation on immediate costs can have the effect of inflating the final cost of building projects.

Singer’s research indicates that the present procurement regime imposes unnecessary time-consuming and costly demands on contractual partners, disregarding Treasury’s instruction to state agencies to avoid “wasted time, effort and resources in achieving the Government’s objectives.”

Citing estimates from the Project Management Institute and the World Economic Forum Singer writes that “mismanagement and inefficiency” can account for 10% to 30% of project costs. Given the New Zealand Government’s previously projected 2017–2020 project spend of $32.5 billion, wastage could run into billions of dollars over that period.

Singer notes in her report that the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment sets out in the document Government Rules of Sourcing five ‘Principles of Government Procurement’: “plan and manage for great results; be fair to all suppliers; get the right supplier; get the best deal for everyone; play by the rules”.

Singer’s research suggests these principles do not seem to be governing the procurement practices of many public sector agencies.

Contrary to the these procurement principles, respondents to Singer’s survey report that state agencies often issue inadequate design briefs with insufficient information on budgets and timelines.

State agencies, the report finds, often request information irrelevant to a project’s type or scale, and run a wasteful process in which changes are often made to the scope of project during tendering.

An especially onerous characteristic of Government procurement behaviour is an increasing resistance to the use of standard contracts for services.

A reported insistence by myriad public agencies on bespoke contracts with uninsurable and impractical requirements is imposing considerable unnecessary legal fees on architects, and causing them to lose productive time.

There are deeper concerns, too, about the lack of transparency in the Government procurement process, an absence of feedback to participants in public sector tenders, a mistrustful relationship between those setting and those replying to tenders, and a race-to-the-bottom focus on suppressing design fees.

Specific industry feedback cited by Singer is that “government employees don’t know much about the building industry” and have “no real understanding about the design process and how it works.”

“In short,” Singer concludes, “the only constant within the procurement of architectural services is a high variability of skill attitude and compliance”.

One result of these shortcomings is a perceived reliance on tick-the-box tendering decision-making that favours factors such as company size and longevity over design creativity and innovation.

Singer notes such a procurement tendency contrasts with the Qualification-Based Selection process implemented in the United States.

A guiding principle of the U.S. procurement system is that “the most qualified firm should not be construed as the largest or longest-tenured firm, but the firm that is the best match for the project scope, size, location and other factors”.

The American system allows for “objective and subjective criteria such as innovation, unique design approaches, sustainable design and total life cost of the project,” and focuses procurement on “the value the building delivers”.

In contrast, Singer’s report suggests, New Zealand Government procurement focuses, at the expense of the greater societal benefit, to “delivering the building”.

There is hope in Singer’s report. Recent company failures in the construction industry, the scale of the Government’s infrastructure and housing programmes and the Office of the Auditor Generals’ interest in public sector procurement mean the time is right to implement adherence across the public sector to the ‘Five Principles of Government Procurement’.

“The Government should become what the World Economic Forum calls an ‘intelligent client’, that is a client that truly understands the market, their impact on it, and the huge amount of value that can be unlocked though adept project management, informed risk share and exemplary design.”

Improving Government Procurement of Architectural Services is available on the New Zealand Institute of Architects website here.


ends


© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines

 

Science Media Centre: Funding For R&D In New Zealand – Expert Reaction

Research, Science and Innovation Minister Dr Megan Woods has today announced $401.3 million funding for research and development through Budget 2020 and the COVID Response and Recovery Fund. The fund includes $150 million for an R&D loan scheme, ... More>>

ALSO:

Maritime NZ: NZ Joins Global Initiative Keeping Ports Open And Freight Moving

New Zealand has joined an international port authorities’ global initiative for safe and efficient movement of goods and shipping during the COVID-19 crisis. World-wide, 56 port authorities have agreed how they will work together facilitating maritime ... More>>

ALSO:

National: National Backs Businesses With $10k JobStart

National will provide a $10,000 cash payment to businesses that hire additional staff as part of our commitment to keeping New Zealanders in jobs, National Party Leader Todd Muller and Finance spokesperson Paul Goldsmith have announced. Our JobStart ... More>>

ALSO:

DIY Law: Government Exempts Some Home Improvements From Costly Consents

Homeowners, builders and DIYers will soon have an easier time making basic home improvements as the Government scraps the need for consents for low-risk building work such as sleep-outs, sheds and carports – allowing the construction sector ... More>>

ALSO:

Media Awards: The New Zealand Herald Named Newspaper Of The Year, Website Of The Year At Voyager Media Awards

The New Zealand Herald has been labelled a “powerhouse news operation” as it claims the two biggest prizes – Newspaper of the Year and Website of the Year – along with many individual awards at the 2020 Voyager Media Awards Website of the ... More>>

ALSO:

ASB Bank: ASB Takes The Lead Again With New Low Home Loan Interest Rate

ASB has moved again to support its customers, cutting a number of home loan rates, including the two-year special rate to a new low of 2.69% p.a. Craig Sims, ASB executive general manager Retail Banking says the reduced rate will be welcome news for many ... More>>

ALSO:

Nathan Hoturoa Gray: The Problems With Testing And Case Statistics For Covid-19

To begin to understand disease transmission in a country requires adequate testing of your population with properly vetted, accurate tests. As the world struggles to find what 'adequate percentage' of the population is necessary, (estimates predict ... More>>

ALSO:

RNZ: Fletcher Building To Lay Off 1000 Staff In New Zealand

The construction company will cut around 10 percent of its workforce as it struggles with the fallout from Covid-19. More>>

ALSO:

Can Pay, Won't Pay: Cashflow Moves Urged

Government Ministers are asking significant private enterprises to adopt prompt payment practices in line with the state sector, as a way to improve cashflow for small businesses. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On Why We Should Legally Protect The Right To Work From Home

For understandable reasons, the media messaging around Level Two has been all about “freedom” and “celebration”, but this is not necessarily going to be a universal experience. When it comes to workplace relations, Level Two is just as likely to ... More>>

ALSO:



New Zealand Government: Supporting Kiwi Businesses To Resolve Rent Disputes

The Government will legislate to ensure businesses that suffered as a result of the COVID-19 response will get help to resolve disputes over commercial rent issues, Justice Minister Andrew Little announced today. More>>

ALSO:


Science Media Centre: Understanding 5G Concerns – Expert Q&A


Recent attacks on cell phone towers have brought concerns over the rollout of 5G technology into sharp relief.
While scientific research has consistently shown that the technology does not adversely affect human health, public concerns about its impact have spread around the world, fueled in part by growing misinformation online. The SMC asked experts to comment... More>>

ALSO:


Trade: Record Monthly Surplus As Imports Dive

Imports in April 2020 had their biggest fall since October 2009, resulting in a monthly trade surplus of $1.3 billion, Stats NZ said today. “This is the largest monthly trade surplus on record and the annual goods trade deficit is the lowest ... More>>

ALSO:


Media Blues: Stuff Chief Executive Buys Company For $1

Stuff chief executive Sinead Boucher has purchased Stuff from its Australian owners Nine Entertainment for $1.
The chief executive was returning the company to New Zealand ownership, with the sale is expected to be completed by 31 May.
"Our plan is to transition the ownership of Stuff to give staff a direct stake in the business as shareholders," Boucher said in a statement.... More>>

ALSO:

RNZ: Bar Reopening Night 'much, Much Quieter'

Pubs and bars are reporting a sluggish first day back after the lockdown, with the fear of going out, or perhaps the joy of staying home, thought to be a reason for the low numbers. More>>

ALSO:

Stats NZ: New Zealand’s Population Passes 5 Million

New Zealand's resident population provisionally reached 5 million in March 2020, Stats NZ said today. More>>

NIWA: Seven Weeks Of Clearing The Air Provides Huge Benefits: Scientist

Seven weeks of lockdown has provided evidence of how pollution can vanish overnight with benefits for the environment and individuals, says NIWA air quality scientist Dr Ian Longley. Dr Longley has been monitoring air quality in Auckland, Wellington ... More>>

ALSO:

Government: Milestone In Cash Flow Support To SMEs

A significant package of tax reforms will be pushed through all stages in Parliament today to throw a cash flow lifeline to small businesses. More>>

ALSO: