Video | Agriculture | Confidence | Economy | Energy | Employment | Finance | Media | Property | RBNZ | Science | SOEs | Tax | Technology | Telecoms | Tourism | Transport | Search


Consumer NZ gets (slip, slop) slap on the wrist

Consumer NZ gets (slip, slop) slap on the wrist for misleading sunscreen claims

By Katherine Rich, Chief Executive, NZ Food & Grocery Council

Consumer NZ has done its annual “testing” of sunscreens and has hit the media claiming many sunscreens don’t measure up to their packaging claims. It’s nonsense.

I’ve put “testing” in inverted commas because if the methodology used is the same as in previous years, though it’s “sciencey” in impression, it’s neither science nor a fair or genuine test of the sunscreens’ efficacy.

I know that the science behind testing SPF has been explained to Consumer NZ at length over the years, but this doesn’t seem to have changed some of the misleading and scaremongering comments made about sunscreens, which achieve little more than undermining their use in New Zealand by confusing consumers and undermining their faith in products.

There is no doubt NZ Food & Grocery Council member products, such as Banana Boat and Hawaiian Tropic, meet New Zealand law – the Cosmetic Products Group Standard and the Fair Trading Act – so when Consumer NZ says companies “can say what they want” in this market, that’s simply not true.

These sunscreens also meet Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Act (TGA) regulations, which means they meet the same (high) standards as medicines. These are the standards Consumer NZ is advocating that sunscreens sold in New Zealand follow. You would think, therefore, their article should reference those standards and regulations, but it does not do that with any degree of balance. I understand that the Cancer Society and SunSense brands also meet TGA standards.

So why does Consumer NZ get such results? A few reasons: variation across a lab’s interpretation and application of the test methodology, the observational nature of the test, environmental conditions the bottle is kept in, and age of the product.

I understand that some of the products tested were nearly three years old and very close to their expiry date. When companies test their products, they do so at scale and at the factory. They test formulations and hold batch samples for future reference.

Consumer NZ has made a big deal over the fact that some of the test results provided by companies are not recent. This shows how little Consumer NZ understands about how therapeutic goods are tested and manufactured.

The age of the test is irrelevant because testing is done at the start of the first batch produced, and then repeated ongoing, including quality tested with batch testing, replicating the formulation, as is common practice across medicines. This is highly audited, and compliance is guaranteed, given the robust nature of the process.

Casting doubt on rigorous scientific testing by questioning when the test was done is dangerous because it spreads uneducated and misleading information about the science involved. This lack of critical investigation and presentation of scientific facts is alarming and falls into the category of fake news and tabloid journalism.

There are so many scientific reasons why post-production testing is not a reliable way to test sunscreens. (It's also why blood pressure medicine is not tested in this way).

SPF testing can vary. The tests involve applying sunscreen to a person, irradiating the skin, waiting, then observing and noting the level of change to the skin. This is where variability can happen between labs when technicians make different judgments by sight about what is pink to red.

Therefore, it is not surprising that different labs sometimes produce different SPF results for the same product batch. Variability within the same lab is more concerning. A company told me at a recent sunscreen industry meeting that they had sent three samples of the same batch of sunscreen to the lab used by Consumer NZ and got three different results.

In summary, it’s an observational science, even under strict and controlled processes.

Due to the variability in SPF testing of sunscreen, the International Organisation for Standarisation (ISO) committee has undertaken a review of the test and is about to issue an updated standard. This will mean that all global testing labs will have to adhere to a stricter guideline, which will lead to less variability in SPF results. The expectation is that the revisions to the test methodology will be published by the end of this calendar year.

The ISO changes are important because they are a response to inconsistencies in test labs’ processes, not sunscreen manufacturers’ products. These changes will serve to lift the confidence of results coming from all test laboratories.

Consumer NZ would be better to use its main message to remind people about the importance of wearing sunscreen, how much to use, and how often to reapply the creams.

Repeating Slip, Slop, Slap and Wrap should be the main message rather than repeating pseudoscience that misleads people about the efficacy of sunscreens.

© Scoop Media

Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines


TradeMe: Property Prices In Every Region Hit New High For The Very First Time

Property prices experienced their hottest month on record in December, with record highs in every region, according to the latest Trade Me Property Price Index.\ Trade Me Property spokesperson Logan Mudge said the property market ended the year with ... More>>

Motor Industry Association: 2020 New Vehicle Registrations Suffer From Covid-19

Chief Executive David Crawford says that like some other sectors of the New Zealand economy, the new vehicle sector suffered from a case of Covid-19. Confirmed figures for December 2020 show registrations of 8,383 were 25% ... More>>

CTU 2021 Work Life Survey: COVID And Bullying Hit Workplaces Hard, Huge Support For Increased Sick Leave

New data from the CTU’s annual work life survey shows a snapshot of working people’s experiences and outlook heading out of 2020 and into the new year. Concerningly 42% of respondents cite workplace bullying as an issue in their workplace - a number ... More>>

Smelter: Tiwai Deal Gives Time For Managed Transition

Today’s deal between Meridian and Rio Tinto for the Tiwai smelter to remain open another four years provides time for a managed transition for Southland. “The deal provides welcome certainty to the Southland community by protecting jobs and incomes as the region plans for the future. The Government is committed to working on a managed transition with the local community,” Grant Robertson said. More>>


OECD: Area Employment Rate Rose By 1.9 Percentage Points In The Third Quarter Of 2020

OECD area employment rate rose by 1.9 percentage points in the third quarter of 2020, but remained 2.5 percentage points below its pre-pandemic level The OECD area [1] employment rate – the share of the working-age population with jobs – rose ... More>>

Economy: Strong Job Ad Performance In Quarter Four

SEEK Quarterly Employment Report data shows a positive q/q performance with a 19% national growth in jobs advertised during Q4 2020, which includes October, November and December. Comparing quarter 4, 2020, with the same quarter in 2019 shows that job ad volumes are 7% lower...More>>

NIWA: 2020 - NZ’s 7th-warmest Year On Record

The nationwide average temperature for 2020, calculated using stations in NIWA’s seven-station temperature series which began in 1909, was 13.24°C (0.63°C above the 1981–2010 annual average). New Zealand’s hottest year on record remains 2016, when... More>>

Quotable Value New Zealand: Property Market Set To Cool From Sizzling To Warm In 2021

Nostradamus himself could not have predicted the strange series of events that befell our world in 2020 – nor the wild trajectory of New Zealand’s property market, which has gone from “doom and gloom” to “boom and Zoom” in record time. Even ... More>>