Video | Agriculture | Confidence | Economy | Energy | Employment | Finance | Media | Property | RBNZ | Science | SOEs | Tax | Technology | Telecoms | Tourism | Transport | Search

 

Bill Proposes Changes To Construction Contracts

The Construction Contracts (Retention Money) Amendment Bill is now with the Transport and Infrastructure Committee for consideration – Buddle Findlay Partner, Tom Bennett and Senior Associate, Ed McGimpsey explore what the proposed changes could mean.

The proposed draft changes to the Construction Contracts retention regime are significant. Clause 18B(1) of the Bill defines “retention money” as “If party A makes a payment to party B and withholds an amount as security, the amount withheld is retention money …”.

This definition has not changed from the definition in the Construction Contracts Act 2002, and makes sense when thinking about retentions in the ordinary course – the amount or percentage agreed in the contract documentation as a withholding by the ‘payer’ (most commonly, a principal) from payment claims by the contractor or subcontractor.

However, there are other circumstances in which money is withheld by principals from contractors (and head contractors from subcontractors) to secure performance. For example, under the General Conditions in NZS 3910:2013 the principal has, through the payment schedule process, the right to make deductions from an amount claimed under a payment claim in certain circumstances (ie, deductions required by the contract or law).

If a permitted deduction is made for defective works, then that deduction seems, to us, to satisfy the definition of retention money. The deduction has been made for the purpose of securing remediation of the defective works or at least providing some protection to the principal against any costs resulting from the defective works if not remediated by the contractor.

As discussed in our earlier update, the Bill introduces, among other things, new rules for separate bank accounts for retention money and offences and penalties. In particular, it is an offence if a payer fails to hold retention money trust in a separate bank account or a complying financial instrument.

This offence has, on conviction, a maximum fine of $200,000 and, if the payer is a body corporate, then each of its directors also commits the offence and, on conviction, will be liable for a maximum fine of $50,000.

Previously, technical issues such as whether or not a particular withholding or deduction constituted a retention money was not, in practice, a significant matter except in an insolvency. Now, under the Bill, such technical matters in the ordinary course of business will have greater significance with the stricter management of retention money and the potential of conviction and fines for non-compliance.

The introduction of new offences and penalties could be a particular risk for principals and head contractors, and their directors, given the widely drawn definition of “retention money”. We will be watching the progress of the Bill carefully and, to the extent it is enacted into law with this definition unchanged, potentially advising our clients to err on the side of caution when holding such monies.

You can review the Bill in its entirety here.

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines

 



BusinessNZ: Third Snapshot Report Reveals $9.5 Billion Business Investment In Climate Action

Signatories to the Climate Leaders Coalition have committed to invest $9.5 billion over the next five years to reduce emissions from their businesses, as revealed in their third anniversary snapshot report released today... More>>

Digitl: The home printer market is broken
Printers are more of a security blanket that a serious aid to productivity. Yet for many people they are not optional.
Even if you don’t feel the urge to squirt ink onto dead trees in order to express yourself, others will insist on printed documents... More>>


Serious Fraud Office: Commences Enquiries Into Allegations Of COVID-19 Wage Subsidy Fraud
The Serious Fraud Office has commenced a number of enquiries into alleged abuse of the Government’s COVID-19 Wage Subsidy. Director Julie Read said the allegations relate to multiple complex cases of potential fraud that have been referred to the agency following extensive investigations ... More>>

ComCom: Companies In Hot Water For Selling Unsafe Hot Water Bottles And Toys

A wholesaler and a retailer have been fined a total of $140,000 under the Fair Trading Act for selling hot water bottles and toys that did not comply with mandatory safety requirements. Paramount Merchandise Company Limited (Paramount) was fined $104,000 after pleading guilty in the Manukau District Court... More>>



Reserve Bank: Robust Balance Sheets Yield Faster Economic Recovery

Stronger balance sheets for households, businesses, financial institutions and the government going into the pandemic contributed towards maintaining a sound financial system and yielding a faster economic recovery than following previous deep recessions... More>>


Transpower: Releases Independent Report Into Events Of August 9
Transpower’s Chief Executive Alison Andrew has today released an independent report into the grid emergency of August 9 when insufficient generation was available to meet demand, leading to some customers being disconnected... More>>