Timely reminder on finding archaeological artefacts

13 January 2015

Timely reminder on finding archaeological artefacts

Recent heightened interest in fossicking using metal detectors and the online sale of moa bones and other artefacts has come with a reminder from Heritage New Zealand about the process that should be followed if potential archaeological artefacts are unearthed.

Heritage New Zealand Senior Archaeologist Pam Bain says it is important that items found are left where they are and reported to Heritage New Zealand. From an archaeological perspective an artefact loses its context once removed from its site and there is the potential any other artefacts nearby could also be damaged.

“The screening of television shows featuring people searching with metal detectors has led to heightened interested in our history. But with this activity comes a risk and people need to be aware that they could potentially be breaking the law, especially if they start digging.

“Any discovery can enhance our understanding of our history and that’s why it’s crucial that any removing and identifying of our heritage is carried out by experts so that significant information isn’t lost or destroyed.

“So much can be learned from an archaeological site if kept in its entirety. Each artefact, its position, and each layer and how they are related provides a historical account of who was there, what they did, how they lived and what happened when they left. It’s this information experts can study to enhance our history for all to understand and appreciate.”

The Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 defines an archaeological site as a place associated with pre-1900 activity where there may be evidence relating to New Zealand’s history.

“It’s essentially covering from the mountains to the sea and everything in between.

“Searching for artefacts is becoming a more organised activity by those interested, with private and public property being frequented. This includes coastal areas such as beaches, parks, farms and building sites.

“It’s important that those involved in this activity are reminded that it is unlawful to damage or alter an archaeological site, which is a place associated with pre-1900 activity where there may be evidence relating to New Zealand’s history.

“This can, and does, result in prosecution when appropriate.”

© Scoop Media