Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Work smarter with a Pro licence Learn More

News Video | Policy | GPs | Hospitals | Medical | Mental Health | Welfare | Search

 

Care Provided To Elderly Woman Fell Short Of Acceptable Standards

The importance of critical thinking and the use of initiative by registered nurses when responding to different scenarios, and the vital role of communication was highlighted in a decision by Deputy Commissioner Rose Wall.

An elderly woman was admitted to a rest home owned and operated by Oceania Care Company Ltd. (Oceania). Following her admission, the woman did not receive her regular medications, most notably insulin, and she died less than 24 hours after her arrival at the facility.

In her decision, Ms Wall found Oceania and two registered nurses in breach of the Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers’ Rights (the Code) for failing to provide services to an elderly woman with reasonable care and skill. She also made adverse comment about care provided by two further registered nurses.

Ms Wall acknowledged the significance of what transpired in this case, and the dire consequences for the consumer and her family as a result of serious shortcomings in her care.

"The care provided to the woman fell short of acceptable standards in a number of areas in a time frame of less than 24 hours. At least three of the four nurses involved in her care failed to fulfil their clinical responsibilities and adhere to policies and procedures.

"People in an aged residential care setting frequently present with multiple comorbidities and complex health conditions, and often are not in a position to advocate for themselves or alert others to issues of concern.

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

"They are reliant on the health professionals responsible for their immediate safety and well-being. It was reasonable to assume that all those health professionals involved in this woman’s brief episode of care should have been competent to recognise and manage her conditions.

"Diabetes is not uncommon - it is a serious disease that affects many older adults," says Ms Wall.

This case highlights the importance of accurate forward planning for new admissions, and of vigilance when dealing with consumers who require their medications in a timely manner.

The Health and Disability Service Standards require organisations to ensure consumers receive medicines in a safe and timely manner that complies with current legislative requirements and safe practice guidelines.

Ms Wall noted Oceania had policies in place to manage medication for new admissions to enable continuity of life-saving medications for new admissions, and the woman’s admission assessment detailed she was taking warfarin and insulin.

"I consider that Oceania was on notice that the woman required potentially life-saving medication and regular monitoring.

"Despite that notice, and having policies and procedures to manage this exact situation, the woman did not receive a prescription or verbal order for life-saving medications and, tragically, did not receive medications that could have managed her blood-sugar levels and ultimately prevented her death.

"While there is individual accountability, Oceania must take responsibility for failures at an organisational level," says Ms Wall.

Ms Wall made multiple recommendations to Oceania, including that it review its policies and guidance for staff, and processes for escalation and follow-up to GPs where urgent medical review is requested. She also recommended that Oceania and the four registered nurses each write an apology to the woman’s family, and familiarise themselves with the Ministry of Health publication "Medicines care guides for residential aged care" (2011).

Ms Wall further recommended the Nursing Council of New Zealand consider whether a review of two of the nurses’ competence is warranted.

Notes

This case relates to a complaint made to HDC in 2019. We aim to investigate complaints as promptly as possible, while ensuring natural justice and the interests of all the parties involved to provide information, and respond to evidence put forward by others is considered.

The full report of this case can be viewed on HDC’s website - see HDC's ' Latest Decisions'.

Names have been removed from the report to protect privacy of the individual involved in this case. We anticipate that the Commissioner will name Te Whatu Ora (previously DHBs) and public hospitals found in breach of the Code unless it would not be in the public interest or would unfairly compromise the privacy interests of an individual provider or a consumer. HDC’s naming policy can be found on our website here.

HDC promotes and protects the rights of people using health and disability services as set out in the Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers' Rights (the Code).

HDC acknowledges the significant pressure the health and disability system is currently under with limited capacity to respond to the demands placed upon it. However, notwithstanding these challenges, people’s rights under the Code continue to apply.

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Culture Headlines | Health Headlines | Education Headlines

 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • CULTURE
  • HEALTH
  • EDUCATION
 
 
  • Wellington
  • Christchurch
  • Auckland
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.