Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search

 

Ramzy Baroud: Immortalizing ‘Ink on Paper’?

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Immortalizing ‘Ink on Paper’?


By Ramzy Baroud

Five years ago, a stimulating commentary, by the United Nations Department of Public Information, celebrated the triumphs and reflected on the challenges still facing the “Universal Declaration of Human Rights”, decades after its formation. It stated, proudly: “Since 1948, the Universal Declaration has been translated into more than 200 languages.” The striking number of translations must be inspiring to denote, especially if one compares today’s far-reaching awareness of those noble principals, to the detrimental state of human rights affairs on the days of its signing.

The United Nations, still a fresh organization, aspired to lead the world out of the quagmire manifested during World War II, “Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind.” A brighter future awaited the post-war generation, it was hoped, a future enshrined with the “recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family (as) the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world.” Yet very few point out, that while the declaration may have exemplified the end of a nightmare for some, for others it was, and remains merely “ink on paper,” an overly used expression that is applied mostly by intellectuals of the so-called Third World, while depicting systematically debased international laws and declarations.

Stripped from its political context and from the palpable prospect of being circumvented altogether, the declaration, nonetheless, delineates a future endorsed by the bulk of humanity, but most ardently by those who in fact were not “born free and equal in dignity and rights.” While schools elsewhere might allude to the value of such a declaration, Palestinian school kids, born into military occupation, incarcerated within terribly poor and swarming refugee camps and bounded (even branded) by their identity as Palestinians are likely to commemorate the anniversary of the declaration by roving around the streets of the Occupied Territory, holding hands, carrying flags and laboriously hauling a giant banner strewn a with badly inscribed Article 3 of the declaration: “Every one has the right to life, liberty and security of person.”

Those kids who roam the streets of Gaza have no first hand experience of what these resounding rights even mean in practice. The recently released report by the Special Rapporrteur of the UN Commission on Human Rights on the Right to Food, finally attached figures and numbers to the lamentable reality endured by Palestinians, but reflected most tragically on their children, over 22% of whom (under five-years of age) suffer from either “acute” or “chronic” malnutrition. Most tragically, 9.3% percent suffer from irreversible brain damage, a direct result of starvation espoused by Israeli military policies – collective punishment: closures, curfews, home demolishing and the like.

“No one shall be held in slavery or servitude,” screams article 4 in the declaration. Such an article might not have much use for 6,000 Palestinian prisoners in Israeli military detention (mostly victims of arbitrary arrests and political prisoners, including 350 under the age of 18) except for being an urgently needed moral validation that they too are an integral part of the “human family”, as it was earnestly epitomized by the declaration. But article 6: “Every one has the right to recognition everywhere before the law,” for them remains a perplexing impasse; most of these prisoners are denied a trial, fair or otherwise, and if law is of relevance, then the ‘Landau Rules’, of the Israeli Supreme Court which sanction ‘certain types’ of torture are implemented.

Nonetheless, no other article within the declaration has rang so close to home, so to speak, like that of article 5: “No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhumane or degrading treatment or punishment.”

Illustrations that so amply manifest the opposite of what article 5 stood for are too many to chronicle. The appalling stories I encountered while documenting the Israeli invasion of Jenin last year are reborn every day throughout the Occupied Territory. But if what took place in Jenin was ‘Palestinian propaganda’ as some so unfairly, albeit irrationally concluded, then what to make of the recently published “Checkpoints-Twilight Zone”, written by a former Israeli army Staff Sergeant Liaran Ron Furer?

The Israeli army in Gaza behaves like ‘animals, criminals, and thieves’ admits Furer; a common practice by the Israeli soldiers is to take photos with their unconsciously beaten or wounded Palestinian victims, a stark reminder of the infamous snapshot of smiling Israeli troops locking shoulders behind a dead Palestinian man still soaked with his blood in the West Bank. "I remember how we humiliated a dwarf who came to the checkpoint every day on his wagon. They forced him to have his picture taken on the horse, hit and degraded him for a good half hour."

“The most moral army in the world”, as suggested by an Israeli army general, found it fit to urinate on a Palestinian boy’s head, according to Furer’s book, for daring to smile at one of the soldiers. The seemingly short and neatly compact universal declaration suddenly augmented. “No one shall be subjected to arbitrary attacks upon his honor,” says one article; the uncounted Palestinians forced to strip naked at checkpoints and raided refugee camps throughout the territories might only comfort themselves with their precise knowledge of what such a law entails. Nothing more

No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property,” declares another. Yet under its shadow, millions of Palestinians endure, without home, without land; thousands of them are once again dwelling in white tents, provided by the United Nations. As illegal Jewish settlements so imprudently expand, thousands of Palestinians are ethnically cleansed. Not even an all-encompassing declaration of human rights is of any tangible value then. “Ink on paper,” is once more illuminated.

But is it too foolish of those poor nations to parade with hastily written statements celebrating rights they never attained? I think not. It matters little, in my belief, who drafted what and why. It is the motif and the dream that lives on. What endures is the “recognition of the inherit dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family (as) the foundation of freedom, justice and peace.” What’s worth celebrating for those who acquire none of these values is the liberating hope, the vision and the noble idea ingrained in the declaration’s lasting tenets, even if they only subsist as “ink on paper”.

************

- Ramzy Baroud is an American-Arab journalist and author. He is the editor-in-chief of Palestine Chronicle and a researcher for the Qatar-based Aljazeera Net English.

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 

Biden In Tokyo: Killing Strategic Ambiguity
Could it have been just another case of bumbling poor judgment, the mind softened as the mouth opened? A question was put to US President Joe Biden, visiting Tokyo and standing beside Japan’s Prime Minister Fumio Kishida: “You didn’t want to get involved in the Ukraine conflict militarily for obvious reasons. Are you willing to get involved militarily to defend Taiwan if it comes to that?” The answer: “Yes. That’s a commitment we made.”.. More>>

Dunne Speaks: Robertson's Budget Gamble On Treasury
The popular test of the success or failure of Grant Robertson’s fifth Budget will be its impact on the soaring cost of living. In today’s climate little else matters. Because governments come and governments go – about every six to seven years on average since 1945 – getting too focused on their long-term fiscal aspirations is often pointless... More>>

Keith Rankin: Liberal Democracy In The New Neonationalist Era: The Three 'O's
The proposed ‘New Zealand Income Insurance Scheme’ (‘the scheme’) has attracted strong debate among the more left-wing and liberal groupings, within New Zealand-Aotearoa. This debate should be seen as a positive rather than negative tension because of the opportunity to consider and learn from the implications and sharpen advocacy... More>>


Digitl: Infrastructure Commission wants digital strategy
Earlier this month Te Waihanga, New Zealand’s infrastructure commission, tabled its first Infrastructure Strategy: Rautaki Hanganga o Aotearoa. Te Waihanga describes its document as a road map for a thriving New Zealand... More>>


Binoy Kampmark: Leaking For Roe V Wade
The US Supreme Court Chief Justice was furious. For the first time in history, the raw judicial process of one of the most powerful, and opaque arms of government, had been exposed via media – at least in preliminary form. It resembled, in no negligible way, the publication by WikiLeaks of various drafts of the Trans-Pacific Partnership... More>>




The Conversation: Cheaper food comes with other costs – why cutting GST isn't the answer

As New Zealand considers the removal of the goods and services tax (GST) from food to reduce costs for low income households, advocates need to consider the impact cheap food has on the environment and whether there are better options to help struggling families... More>>