Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search

 

Johnson & Walrath: The “N” Word

The “N” Word


By Patricia L Johnson and Richard E Walrath

It was a bright, sunny afternoon on January 20, 1961 when John F. Kennedy stood before the podium and delivered his memorable inaugural address which included the following “Let us never negotiate out of fear, but let us never fear to negotiate.”

George W Bush has filled his cabinet with corporate types basically turning the Whitehouse into a business run by CEO’s whose primary goal is to look out for the bottom line.

So why are these people, who have used this tool on a daily basis in their corporate positions, suddenly backing away from the negotiation tables when it comes to negotiating Medicare Part D pharmaceutical costs?

When The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003, PL 108-173 was signed into law on December 8, 2003, it prohibited the Secretary of Health and Human Services from interfering in negotiations between Part D sponsors and drug manufacturers. Part D is an outpatient prescription drug benefit offered to Medicare beneficiaries and is currently overseen by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.

This administration feels so strongly against negotiation that the following statement was submitted to the U.S. House of Representatives prior to a vote on H.R. 4 If H.R. 4 were presented to the President, he would veto the bill

On January 12, 2007 the Medicare Prescription Drug Negotiation Act of 2007 was voted on and passed by 255-170. This bill amends title XVIII of the Social Security Act to require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to negotiate lower Part D drug prices on behalf of Medicare beneficiaries.

Why does this administration feel so strongly against negotiating Part D drug prices that it provided a written statement indicating its intent to veto if the bill passed?

The answer seems relatively simple – negotiating lower prices with the pharmaceutical companies will more than likely result in lower bottom lines for an industry that profit billions of your hard-earned dollars each year.


Click for big version

Data Source: CNN Money

Drug companies couldn’t get a better deal than the one they have now, so why should they negotiate with anyone?

President Bush desperately wants to be able to say he did something about Social Security before he leaves office. There’s also a chance, that in sheer desperation to escape being considered the worst president over 200 years, he may decide to support some form of national health care.

So, how about a tie between Social Security and National Health Insurance?

Why not extend Medicare coverage so it’s available to everyone?

If you take two problems and use them to solve each other that’s real negotiation!

All it takes is a beginning, and the beginning should be a concerted effort to negotiate Medicare Part D benefits with the pharmaceutical companies.

Who knows, this may end up being the first step towards affordable health insurance for all.

ENDS

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 


Ian Powell: Are we happy living in Handy's Age of Unreason?

On 19 June the Sunday Star Times published my column on the relationship between the Labour government’s stewardship of Aotearoa New Zealand’s health system and the outcome of the next general election expected to be around September-October 2023: Is the health system an electoral sword of Damocles for Labour... More>>


The First Attack On The Independents: Albanese Hobbles The Crossbench
It did not take long for the new Australian Labor government to flex its muscle foolishly in response to the large crossbench of independents and small party members of Parliament. Despite promising a new age of transparency and accountability after the election of May 21, one of the first notable acts of the Albanese government was to attack the very people who gave voice to that movement. Dangerously, old party rule, however slim, is again found boneheaded and wanting... More>>


Binoy Kampmark: Predictable Monstrosities: Priti Patel Approves Assange’s Extradition
The only shock about the UK Home Secretary’s decision regarding Julian Assange was that it did not come sooner. In April, Chief Magistrate Senior District Judge Paul Goldspring expressed the view that he was “duty-bound” to send the case to Priti Patel to decide on whether to extradite the WikiLeaks founder to the United States to face 18 charges, 17 grafted from the US Espionage Act of 1917... More>>


Dunne Speaks: Roe V. Wade Blindsides National

Momentum is everything in politics, but it is very fragile. There are times when unexpected actions can produce big shifts and changes in the political landscape. In 2017, for example, the Labour Party appeared headed for another hefty defeat in that year’s election until the abrupt decision of its then leader to step aside just weeks before the election. That decision changed the political landscape and set in train the events which led to Labour being anointed by New Zealand First to form a coalition government just a few weeks later... More>>

Digitl: Infrastructure Commission wants digital strategy
Earlier this month Te Waihanga, New Zealand’s infrastructure commission, tabled its first Infrastructure Strategy: Rautaki Hanganga o Aotearoa. Te Waihanga describes its document as a road map for a thriving New Zealand... More>>


Binoy Kampmark: Leaking For Roe V Wade
The US Supreme Court Chief Justice was furious. For the first time in history, the raw judicial process of one of the most powerful, and opaque arms of government, had been exposed via media – at least in preliminary form. It resembled, in no negligible way, the publication by WikiLeaks of various drafts of the Trans-Pacific Partnership... More>>