Commission's role to build discussion and dialogue
Human Rights Commission
Media Release
13 April
2006
Commission's role to build discussion and dialogue
The Human Rights Commission has provided advice to government and Parliament and promoted constructive discussion throughout the public debate on the foreshore and seabed issue, Race Relations Commissioner Joris de Bres said today.
He was responding to criticism of the Commission by Maori Party co-leader Dr Pita Sharples.
Mr de Bres said it was not correct to say that the Commission had failed to engage on the foreshore and seabed issue, although no-one was able to bridge the gap between different parties because positions became so entrenched.
Mr de Bres said that key Commission actions had included the following:
*
The Commission made an extensive submission to the Prime
Minister
* The Commission commented positively on
the Waitangi Tribunal report
* The Commission
provided a detailed submission on the Foreshore and Seabed
Bill to the Select Committee
* The Commission received a number
of complaints about the Foreshore and Seabed Act, including
a complaint from Ms Tariana Turia which was received on 14
April 2005. All complaints were acknowledged and there was
further correspondence with the complainants about the
process, including Ms Turia. The matter was notified to
Crown Law on 1 June 2005, with a request for their response
to the issues raised as part of the normal mediation
process. The response from Crown Law was not received by the
Commission until 16 February 2006, which was the reason for
the delay in responding substantively to Ms Turia.
Throughout this time, the Commission was in contact with Ms
Turia to inform her about the progress of the matter. *
The Commission has organised public forums to debate the
issue and other matters relating to human rights and the
Treaty of Waitangi
Mr de Bres said that his
response to the Report of the UN Special Rapporteur,
Professor Stavenhagen, had not been reported fully on Radio
New Zealand and he had registered a complaint with them
about that. He said that the radio report, on which Dr
Sharples' criticism was based did not capture his view that
the recommendations of the report were a "missed
opportunity". Mr de Bres said that at a hui on
Rangatiratanga at Victoria University on Tuesday (which was
organised by the Commission) he had made it clear that his
comments were not about the body of the report, which set
out many of the issues clearly, and in fact quoted
extensively from the Commission's own submission on the
Foreshore and Seabed Bill. Rather he was disappointed with
the recommendations, which he felt were unlikely to be
accepted in their present form. He felt that in a different
form they could have led to renewed dialogue and cooperation
on the important issues raised. Mr de Bres said he would
continue to look for ways in which the issues raised by the
UN Special Rapporteur's report could be practically
advanced. He said that that an important aspect of the
Commission's role was to build constructive relationships
between the diverse groups that make up New Zealand, not to
act as a lobbyist for any particular group. The Commission's
focus was on dispute resolution and getting parties to talk
to one another. The Commission has provided its
assessment of race relations in New Zealand in its recent
report, Race Relations in 2005
Mr de Bres said he
would seek to meet with Dr Sharples to discuss the issues
further. "I have the highest regard for Pita as a former
staff member of the Race Relations Office and hope we can
resolve some of these misunderstandings." ENDS
Gordon Campbell: On Pauline Hanson’s Rise, And The TOP Renaissance
Hapai Te Hauora: New Online Gambling Laws Could Grow Harm While Claiming To Reduce It
New Zealand Alliance Party: Alliance Party Firmly Opposes “Backdoor Privatisation” Of Kiwibank
Taxpayers' Union: New Poll - Coalition Still Ahead; Luxon Regains 'Preferred Prime Minister' Top-Spot
NZ National Party: Judith Collins’ Valedictory Speech
Forest And Bird: Government Biodiversity Credit Scheme Welcomed As Opportunity For Restoration
Office of the Ombudsman: Ombudsman Publishes Findings On Ministry Of Education Sensitive Claims Scheme

