"Grand Coalition" re-affirms need for alternative
Press Release: Direct Democracy Party:
Grand Coalition” on anti-smacking Bill re-affirms need for fresh electorate alternative for voters in 2008:
The “Grand Coalition” agreement by the National and Labour Party over the anti-smacking Bill has re-affirmed the need for a fresh electorate alternative for voters in 2008, says Direct Democracy Party leader Kelvyn Alp.
“The reaction by the majority of National Party supporters (and the reported private reaction of some of the National Party MP’s) to National Party Leader John Key’s “sleeping with the enemy” has been shock, disbelief, and a sense of philosophical betrayal to its core constituency”.
If the Direct Democracy Party had been directly involved in this very contentious issue, our first initiative would have been to hold a Binding Referendum with the people of New Zealand, and then vote either for or against this Bill depending on the will of the people of New Zealand”.
“Clearly, the will of the people of New Zealand was overwhelmingly against this deeply flawed Bill becoming law – and so in accordance with the principles of Binding Referendum, we would have voted against this Bill becoming law”.
“The will of the people of New Zealand is being treated with disdain, disrespect, and abject dismissal by the same political parties over the same issues – The Direct Democracy Party intends to champion Binding Referendum in the 2008 election, so that the will of the people of New Zealand can finally have a genuine voice in formulating public policy”, says Mr Alp.
ENDS
Gordon Campbell: On The Risks Of AI In The Workplace
Tauranga City Council: Mauao Restoration Work Has Begun
Horizon Research: New Poll Finds High Concern About Fuel Situation
Tiaki Wai: Over 1,150 People Give Feedback On Tiaki Wai Water Services Strategy
Greenpeace Aotearoa: Israeli Forces Illegally Attack Peaceful Humanitarian Flotilla
Zero Waste Network: Container Return Scheme Bill Could Save Councils $50m A Year And Put Money Back In Households
Office of the Privacy Commissioner: Privacy Commissioner Does Not Support Policing Amendment Bill

