Shane Taurima Interviews Peter Marshall
Shane Taurima Interviews Peter
Marshall
Police hadn’t identified
whether those at the Urewera training camps had any
particular targets before their 2007 raids, would still like
to know what was going on in those camps
Despite
numerous media reports to the contrary, Marshall says he
wasn’t aware of any threat to then-Opposition leader John
Key – “there were no threat assessments against
him”
Key visited remote Urewera marae two months
before raids, but Marshall insists police would not have let
him go if there was a particular risk at that stage; won’t
comment on whether he had police protection
Says
“absolutely no evidence” of armed officers boarding a
school bus – “it simply didn’t happen” – despite
bus driver Isaac Nuku’s evidence that an armed officer
came on his bus
Marshall “not aware” of claims
President Bush would be assassinated by catapulting a bus
onto him – doesn’t take away from fact lives were
threatened
Police would use the same approach in
Remuera or Parnell as they used in the
Ureweras
Sending local police or Maori liaison
officers to talk to Iti and his associates would have been a
“naïve approach”
Police received information
and thanks from “frightened” Urewera people;
Commissioner happy to visit Tuhoe if invited
“Iti
has wonderful attributes in some regards, but he’s not
exactly in then peak of physical condition”, so he doubts
he’d get security work in Iraq
Police not aware
of any continuing risk in Ureweras; group disbanded and
“exposed for what they are”
Group’s actions
represented a “frightening prospect” for society: “I
don’t think for one moment [the police response] was over
the top”
Q+A, 9-10am Sundays on TV ONE.
Repeats of Q&A will screen on TVNZ7 at 9pm Sundays and 9am
and 1pm on Mondays.
Thanks to the support from
NZ ON Air.
Q+A is on Facebook, http://www.facebook.com/NZQandA#!/NZQandA
and on Twitter, http://twitter.com/#!/NZQandA
Q+A
SHANE
TAURIMA INTERVIEWS PETER
MARSHALL
PAUL
HOLMES
Shane Taurima spoke to Peter Marshall on Friday and began by
asking what plot was uncovered and who was at
risk.
PETER MARSHALL – Police
Commissioner
Well, I think it’s fair to say that there was no
particular target or set of targets identified, but it was
against a backdrop of a firearm, for instance, being
dismantled and being set down to Wellington; against a
backdrop of discussions about a sniper rifle and a silencer;
discussions about destroying property and explosives; and,
of course, there were the threats in relation to people - to
actually kill people. It was against that chemistry built up
over a number of weeks that there was growing alarm, and in
fact the High Court judge who was signing the renewal
warrants was making it quite clear that the police should be
actually taking action as a result of the submissions - May,
June - that
process-
SHANE
So you were confident at the time that they did actually
have a target?
PETER Well, we
were certainly very alarmed at the increasing number of
discussions, the nature of those discussions. As I said,
they dismantled a firearm, took it through to
Wellington-
SHANE Did you
know, though, at the time, Commissioner, what their target
was?
PETER No,
as I’ve said, we didn’t know their particular target.
It’s a matter of balance. Do we actually wait until
something happens, the unthinkable happens? And then, of
course, you can imagine the commentary then. Or do we, at an
appropriate time, take action because we need to take
action-
SHANE So
what did you expect them to
do?
PETER Well,
they were talking about causing damage, by way of
explosives, to buildings. They were talking about killing
people. They weren’t specific in relation to it. They
actually talked about creating a lot of mayhem around the
country. They talked about a revolutionary arm, if you like.
We don’t know the specifics. But what we were convinced
about, it wasn’t just idle talk. There was a lot of
commentary that gave us as investigators and indeed, as I
mentioned, the High Court judge also expressed alarm. We
were, in a very considered way, very worried about what they
might as a group or individually- They were getting
themselves all psyched up, and we decided to take the action
that you are well aware
of.
SHANE
Commissioner, if it was that serious, why, then, did you
allow the leader of the opposition at the time, our current
Prime Minister John Key, to visit the area two months before
the raids took
place?
PETER
There was no suggestion that he was in any shape or form a
target. He wasn’t the prime minister of the day. It was a
very considered approach in terms of whether he should go
there. He was invited there by senior iwi. We did a risk
assessment in relation to that particular location. At that
time there was no threat assessment against
him-
SHANE But
we understand that there were reports at the time of him
being a target.
PETER Not that
I’m specifically aware of. But be assured that we would
not have let him as leader of the opposition go into that
area if we, at that particular stage, thought he was at
risk. So we covered that
off.
SHANE But
you didn’t know the target, though, Commissioner.
PETER No,
that’s true, but we were very convinced that the security
arrangements around him at that time were sufficient, and in
relation to our threat assessment, there was no risk to
him.
SHANE The
other fact, too, that we’re told is that Mr Key had no
cops. He had no police escort in the
area.
PETER
Well, I’m not telling the audience what he did and
didn’t have, but suffice to say that there was appropriate
security for him backed up by a threat assessment in
relation to that one visit on that one day in that very
specific area. We wouldn’t have taken any risks in that
regard.
SHANE
We’re also told that one of the targets was the president
of the United States at the time, George W Bush, and that
they were thinking of ways to assassinate him, if you like,
was to catapult a bus on to
him.
PETER I’m
not aware of that particular approach, but I’m certainly
aware that President Bush’s name was mentioned in
conversations. I don’t know what context. But that
doesn’t take away from the fact that there were a number
of remarks made about the use of explosives, about attacking
institutions, and indeed killing people.
SHANE Could you
not have sent, for example, the local police down to knock
on their doors and to see what they were actually doing, or,
for example, used the local Maori liaison
officers?
PETER
Well, of course, that is one approach, but I would regard
that as being a very naïve approach. I mean, I liken it to
police looking at a group of teenagers in their late teens,
for argument’s sake, and they were going to commit
burglaries or aggravated robberies. Do we go along and tap
on their door, or do we go and see their parents and say,
‘Listen, your charges are actually not behaving
themselves’? There’s no law for one group and law for
another group. This was serious
offending.
SHANE
So would you, for example, take the same approach in other
areas like Remuera or
Parnell?
PETER
Very much so. We would wait and see and determine what’s
happened. People are getting arrested in those suburbs up
and down the country every day for serious offending. We
didn’t want to go to the Ureweras; we were brought to that
area because of the antics and the criminal behaviour of
that particular
group.
SHANE
Would you, for example, allow armed officers dressed like
ninjas to board buses of school
kids?
PETER
Well, I’ve heard that comment made. I have asked many
questions of many people, and there is absolutely no
evidence on that particular point of armed offenders squad
members going on to a bus with schoolchildren. From my point
of view, it simply did not
happen.
SHANE Is
there still a threat? Is there still a risk in the
area?
PETER Not
that I’m aware
of.
SHANE
Are you still monitoring those involved in Operation
Eight?
PETER
Well, I’m not going to go into any operational matter
involving that group or any other group. Suffice to say that
we have no particular information about the Ureweras. We
believe that group was disbanded. They’ve been exposed for
what they are. I think the police actions are being very
clearly vindicated by the High Court judge yesterday.
There’s been no more nonsense. But going back to your
other point, a senior iwi representative from Tuhoe gave
evidence in the High Court, and he said that the elders were
afraid in the valley, and they made the point that the
elders did not think that the police had overreacted.
SHANE Maori
Affairs Minister Pita Sharples has denounced the police
action. He says that it was over the
top.
PETER Yes,
well, as I said before, elders within the Ruatoki area, as
given in evidence by a Mr Nakora in the High Court, said
that the police actions were not over the top, and I can
tell you that people in the
area-
SHANE And,
with respect, that’s one elder versus a community, if you
like, of elders that have said the complete
opposite.
PETER
Well, I mean, again, putting things in context, we received
some complaints from the Ureweras about the activities of
these people. We actually received a lot of information from
people in the wider Urewera area, and a lot of people
thanked us from that area as well. So there’s a mixed
reaction.
SHANE
Do you think that Tame Iti is capable of killing a
person?
PETER I
have no idea. You’d have to ask Mr Tame Iti that. But
certainly the collective group are very worrying in relation
to their rhetoric, in relation to their actions, and not
just discussions alone. Lots of very troubling events
happened
there.
SHANE We
looked at Urs Signer as another example - a pacifist. Are
these people capable of assassinating people, of killing
people?
PETER
Well, the question that people are asking is why hasn’t
there been some explanation from these individuals? We’ve
told the public what they were doing in relation to all
this, and all we have is some commentary about them being
potentially aligned to the security industry in Iraq. Now, I
know Mr Iti has wonderful attributes in some regards, but
he’s not exactly in the peak of physical condition, nor
are his co-accused, and in terms of the security industry in
that part of the world, I don’t think they’d be an
attractive proposition. So we don’t know, and I’m sure
the people around this country would like to
know.
SHANE And
if it was so serious, though, Commissioner, why did it take
18 months? Why didn’t you move in earlier? Because it
seems like it took an awfully long time to try and come up
and find some answers, when actually you didn’t have the
answers because you didn’t know what the target
was.
PETER No,
we were certainly gathering the evidence, and there was a
lot of work being undertaken, and we wanted to make sure
that we were dealing with a criminal enterprise, people who
were in possession of firearms for the wrong reasons. We
came to the conclusion, the courts vindicated the police
actions, and the judge was particularly scathing about this
militia, and he made a point that in his view there was a
threat to the democratic processes, or words to that effect,
in this country. A High Court judge doesn’t make those
comments lightly, and as I said, a frightening prospect for
society, he said.
SHANE
Annette King, who was police minister at the time, was
briefed the night before the raids. She told us on Q&A that
what happened the next day was out of proportion to what she
was briefed about. Do you stand by the briefing that was
given to the
minister?
PETER
Well, she would have seen footage of armed officers on the
streets around that particular location, Ruatoki. She
wasn’t present at that situation. Operational deployments
are the responsibility of the police to ensure that police
officers and the people they’re dealing with are kept
safe. No one was injured. No one was shot. 17 firearms were
found. I don’t think for one moment it was over the top.
SHANE Was the
minister given the wrong impression, or did she simply get
the wrong end of the
stick?
PETER I
think she was viewing the coverage of the police officers
armed in the location. I wasn’t present at that briefing.
Operational matters are a matter for the police. But I know
in briefings of ministers we would give them the broad
overview of what’s happening. The operational deployments
would never be briefed to the minister. That is an
independence of the police and the separation of powers in
that
context.
SHANE
In terms of the apology that you have given the Ruatoki
community, the local MP Te Ururoa Flavell says it’s come
too late, it was a reluctant apology, and he’s called it a
slap in the
face.
PETER Yes,
well, I have not met that particular MP. I’ve had
discussions with senior iwi representatives from Tuhoe and
I’ve made it quite clear I’m happy to go back there, and
I will do when invited back there Of course, the court
proceedings slowed processes down in that regard. I’ve
made the apology in the context of innocent people who were
caught up. Absolutely no apology for the investigation.
Absolutely no apology for the arrests. Absolutely no apology
for the prosecution. And I stand by the officers, and as I
said before, I think New Zealand is well served by the New
Zealand
police-
SHANE So
you’re quite happy to go back to the Ruatoki community and
give a face-to-face
apology?
PETER
To those people who were innocently affected, who were
inconvenienced, distressed, or indeed fearful, but I’m
certainly not in the business of making a wholesale apology,
because we have nothing to apologise for in the context of
that Operation Eight. The people who were responsible for
Operation Eight should, in fact, be considering an apology
for the shame that they brought on the
Ureweras.
ENDS
Gordon Campbell: On Pauline Hanson’s Rise, And The TOP Renaissance
Hapai Te Hauora: New Online Gambling Laws Could Grow Harm While Claiming To Reduce It
New Zealand Alliance Party: Alliance Party Firmly Opposes “Backdoor Privatisation” Of Kiwibank
Taxpayers' Union: New Poll - Coalition Still Ahead; Luxon Regains 'Preferred Prime Minister' Top-Spot
NZ National Party: Judith Collins’ Valedictory Speech
Forest And Bird: Government Biodiversity Credit Scheme Welcomed As Opportunity For Restoration
Office of the Ombudsman: Ombudsman Publishes Findings On Ministry Of Education Sensitive Claims Scheme

