Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Work smarter with a Pro licence Learn More

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 

Seabed mining hearing has “gone off the rails”

24 April 2017

Seabed mining hearing has “gone off the rails” – KASM & Greenpeace

The Environmental Protection Authority’s hearings on a seabed mining application have “gone off the rails,” environmental groups Kiwis Against Seabed Mining and Greenpeace have told the EPA.

The EPA has requested a wide range of new information from Trans Tasman Resources Ltd, the company applying to dig up 50 million tonnes of the South Taranaki Bight seabed each year for 35 years for an annual five million tonnes of iron ore for direct export.

However, the groups contend – in a memo sent to the EPA - that this information should have been part of the original application, which the EPA accepted as “complete” in September last year. Forest and Bird, and Ngati Ruanui have sent memos to the EPA supporting KASM's views.

“This hearing has seriously gone off the rails,” the groups told the EPA, telling the Authority they are considering applying for a judicial review of the process, a declaratory statement, or an appeal based on the flawed process.

“It is demonstrably clear… that the [EPA] has embarked on an exercise of completing and, in effect, proving the Applicant’s case. This is an unlawful exercise of power which also significantly prejudices submitters in opposition to the application.”

“After accepting the original application as ‘complete,’ and after evidence from submitters, the caucusing of a wide range of experts, and recalling experts to give further evidence, the EPA has now turned around and asked the company for a whole lot of new information,” said Phil McCabe, KASM chairperson.

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

“We knew this information was missing and told the EPA back in September – it was one of the main reasons the EPA refused the company consent for its first application in 2014. Yet the EPA went ahead and accepted this deficient application – and are now requesting detail they should have asked for seven months ago.”

This new information may make the application look very different than it did at the beginning of the process, during the consultation and notification periods. It is requisite for major proposals such as this to have comprehensive and comprehensible information available when parties are deciding whether or not to engage and what areas require attention, energy and resources. To have a considerable amount of information put on the table at the end of the process means that opportunities for proper public engagement in the process have now been lost.

“As a volunteer-run community organisation KASM doesn’t have an open chequebook – this hearing has already cost us tens of thousands of dollars and huge amounts of time,” said McCabe. The fishing industry and Ngati Ruanui have also withdrawn from much of the hearing, citing excessive cost burdens.

Similar concerns were set out in a memo to the EPA by the fisheries submitters and the local Iwi, Ngati Ruanui, last month - a reaction to the EPA extending the hearing until May 31 to allow the company to complete new modelling around the “plume” of sediment that would be created in the South Taranaki Bight from the mining.

This is the latest in a number of very questionable procedural decisions by the EPA, including allowing the seabed mining company to redact some 190 pages of their application, which was subsequently overturned by the Environment Court in November after KASM and Greenpeace objected.


ends

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines


Gordon Campbell: On The US Opposition To Mortgage Interest Deductibility For Landlords


Should landlords be able to deduct the interest on the loans they take out to bankroll their property speculation? The US Senate Budget Committee and Bloomberg News don't think this is a good idea, for reasons set out below. Regardless, our coalition government has been burning through a ton of political capital by giving landlords a huge $2.9 billion tax break via interest deductibility, while still preaching the need for austerity to the disabled, and to everyone else...
More


 
 

Government: Concerns Conveyed To China Over Cyber Activity
Foreign Minister Winston Peters has confirmed New Zealand’s concerns about cyber activity have been conveyed directly to the Chinese Government. “The Prime Minister and Minister Collins have expressed concerns today about malicious cyber activity... More

ALSO:


Government: GDP Decline Reinforces Government’s Fiscal Plan

Declining GDP for the December quarter reinforces the importance of restoring fiscal discipline to public spending and driving more economic growth, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says... More

ALSO:


Government: Humanitarian Support For Gaza & West Bank

Winston Peters has announced NZ is providing a further $5M to respond to the extreme humanitarian need in Gaza and the West Bank. “The impact of the Israel-Hamas conflict on civilians is absolutely appalling," he said... More


Government: New High Court Judge Appointed

Judith Collins has announced the appointment of Wellington Barrister Jason Scott McHerron as a High Court Judge. Justice McHerron graduated from the University of Otago with a BA in English Literature in 1994 and an LLB in 1996... More

 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

InfoPages News Channels


 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.