Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search


Higher taxes for super rich gets voter tic

“Higher taxes for super rich gets voter tic”

“Taxes, taxes, taxes, and all the rest is b******t.” That was the message that went viral at the Davos Economic Forum last month, and it’s the message our Government needs to hear if it wants to tackle inequality in New Zealand.

The “Taxes, taxes, taxes” challenge came from Rutger Bregman, a Dutch historian, who told the rich and famous at Davos that amid all the talk of justice and equality, no one was raising the real problem, which was the rich not paying their fare share.

Bregman’s views have been widely applauded, and they offer a lesson for New Zealand as the Government considers the soon-to-be released Tax Working Group Report. It’s clear there’s going to be a lot of noise from all sides about the merits of taxation on capital gains. But what we really need is a debate on the much larger question of what is the most appropriate level of taxation for New Zealand.

Government spending in New Zealand is currently limited to 30 percent of GDP, most of which comes from taxation. Somehow we have both a Government and an opposition wedded to this figure as if it were the holy grail of running a modern economy. It’s not, and sticking to such an arbitrary cap is a mistake. It is among the lowest level of government spending in the OECD, with governments in most developed countries spending over 40% percent of GDP.

Our low level of government spending is why New Zealanders are dying of cancer while they’re on hospital waiting lists, it is why we spend too little on mental health. It means well-off parents pay additional ‘voluntary’ school levies while schools in poorer areas cannot even begin to get that sort of assistance from their community. It is why we have disgracefully high levels of child poverty.

Taxation is the cost we pay for living in a fair and functioning modern society, and we need to start the tax debate with a dose of realism, by looking not just at capital gains tax, but at overall levels of taxation and spending.

There are two arguments we will hear opposing higher levels of tax. The first is that increasing tax levels will limit economic progress. In fact, one of the periods of strongest growth was in the post-war period when tax rates were much higher than at present. The post-war boom in the USA saw tax rates as high as 90 percent on the wealthy. But we are not advocating those tax levels. We must pay more, and somewhere over 40 percent is absolutely affordable.

The second argument will be that the private sector and individuals can make better decisions on spending than the government can. While that may be true in some parts of the economy, when it comes to things like health, education and social safety nets, a strong public sector is the only way to run a fair society.

We must broaden the discussion, and talk about paying more tax. Our tax system certainly needs to include a tax on capital gains, and higher taxes for the wealthy and those in high-paying jobs. But it will also mean less inequality and fairer access to health, education and social supports. We need to focus on the benefits rather than the costs and stop pretending we can have a fair society with current low levels of taxation.

© Scoop Media

Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Whakaari/White Island: A Minute’s Silence For Victims

A minute’s silence will be observed at 2.11pm on Monday 16 December in honour of the victims of the Whakaari White Island eruption, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has confirmed...

The minute’s silence will be exactly one week after the eruption started on Monday 9 December. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On What An Inquiry Might Look Like
Presumably, if there is to be a ministerial inquiry (at the very least) into the Whakaari/White Island disaster, it will need to be a joint ministerial inquiry. That’s because the relevant areas of responsibility seem to be so deeply interwoven... More>>


More Discussions: National On Housing, Transport And Infrastructure

National has today released the ninth and tenth in our series of discussion documents, which contain a range of proposals to ensure New Zealand has the high-quality housing and infrastructure it needs to prosper, Leader of the Opposition Simon Bridges says. More>>


Trains: Govt's Plans For Rail

The Government has released its long term vision for a sustainable 21st Century rail network that gets our cities moving, connects our regions and gets more freight off the roads. More>>


Gordon Campbell: On Welfare Vs Infrastructure Spending

If New Zealand has a pressing need to stimulate its flagging economy, it seems very weird that the government is choosing a $12 billion package of infrastructure spending – mainly on road and rail – that by definition, will take a very long time to deliver their stimulatory benefits ... More>>

New Reports: "Immediate Commitment To Doing Justice Differently"

Justice Minister Andrew Little released two reports today, Turuki! Turuki! from Te Uepū Hāpai I te Ora, and Te Tangi o te Manawanui: Recommendations for Reform from the Chief Victims Advisor. Both recommend a fresh approach to the way criminal justice has been approached... More>>


"Heart-Breaking And Confronting": Surgical Mesh Restorative Justice Report

Minister Genter: “People have talked about losing the life they had enjoyed before surgical mesh harmed them – the loss of a steady job, the ability to exercise, a loving relationship in some cases. Others described the chronic pain they experienced..." More>>


Law Foundation: Government Decryption Powers Must Respect Privacy

The power of government to order users and companies to decrypt encrypted data and devices needs stronger privacy protections and additional safeguards, according to a study published by researchers at the University of Waikato. More>>





InfoPages News Channels