The Forest Owners Association (FOA) says the just announced cost recovery scheme for the Emissions Trading Scheme is another government disincentive to plant forests just when they are most needed.

President Grant Dodson says the huge jump to a more than $14 million a year cost recovery formula to be imposed by the government is neither reasonable nor equitable.

“It’s important to realise that this is a $14m administration charge which sits over and above activity charges. They are also increasing such as registration, returns and simple basic form filling activities.

“The ETS is for a public benefit. It has no other basis for existing other than to store carbon from the atmosphere to combat climate change and that is of benefit to all New Zealanders.”

“A better description of something designed to advance the public good would be hard to find. Suggesting that those who have been encouraged to participate should now fund the lion’s share of this public good policy instrument does not recognise its sole purpose.”

“New Zealand’s emitters are responsible for 77 million tonnes of carbon dioxide, or equivalent, per year. They aren’t charged anything for a scheme which would be unnecessary without their emissions. They should be contributing.”

“Imposing these new massive levels of charges for administration costs on foresters for the scheme is unreasonable. Most plantation forests are not in the ETS. The carbon locked in them provides a public good in sequestering more than 15 million tonnes of carbon dioxide a year, for which they receive no reward.”

Grant Dodson says foresters had no say in setting up a needlessly complicated scheme.

“It’s open ended, there are cross subsidies. Bigger foresters have to pay more, not because they use more ETS services, but simply because a crude annual charge of $30.25 per hectare formula makes the MPI bookwork easier.”

He says many foresters are a number of years away from harvest and will not be earning any income to pay the cost recovery until potentially decades in the future.

“I’ve just heard from one typical forester. He has a 600 hectare block. He gets no services from the ETS administration – just an annual charge of $18,000 a year. He’s wondering why he’s in the ETS.”

Grand Dodson says foresters are also concerned that they will be paying to run a system which is currently being reviewed with the possibility that the scheme will effectively be abolished.

“We are being forced to pay huge increases into a scheme which the current government has presented options to disconnect.”

Farm Forestry Association President, Neil Cullen says small scale woodlot owners are also facing huge increases, with new charges for 22 different ETS services.

“If someone transfers their ETS participation to someone else, then they will be charged $990 just for entering a new name into the system. How much work does that take?”

“These charges will be just another disincentive to plant trees. Our woodlots provide the well-known benefits of carbon sequestration. But so often they are areas of exotics surrounded and intertwined with a range of indigenous trees. And that makes for a lot of biodiversity in our landscape.”

© Scoop Media

Gordon Campbell: On The Government’s Smokefree Laws Debacle

The most charitable explanation for National’s behaviour over the smokefree legislation is that they have dutifully fulfilled the wishes of the Big Tobacco lobby and then cast around – incompetently, as it turns out - for excuses that might sell this health policy U-turn to the public. The less charitable view is that the government was being deliberately misleading. Are we to think Prime Minister Christopher Luxon is a fool, or a liar? It seems rather early on in his term of office to be facing that unpleasant choice. Yet when Luxon (and senior MP Chris Bishop) tried to defend the indefensible with the same wildly inaccurate claim, there are not a lot of positive explanations left on the table.... More