Northland Regional Council Right to Reject GMOs Moratorium
“Rejecting a moratorium on genetic modification (GM) in Northland will broaden economic opportunities, enable vital tools to meet our environmental challenges and was the right decision for the Northland Regional Council to make”, the chairman of the Life Sciences Network Dr William Rolleston said today.
GE Free Northland and others had attempted to inject prohibitive GM provisions into the regional plan part way through the planning process. This was finally rejected by the council earlier this month citing in their rationale that it is the responsibility of the Environmental Risk Management Authority to assess and control genetically modified organisms (GMOs) at this time.
Activists have for some time pushed to stop farmers and conservationists using modern genetic technologies by persuading councils to impose onerous local rules and outright prohibitions. They claimed national legislation and decision makers – considered by scientists to be among the most strict and conservative in the world – were not enough to manage the risks they perceived to be present despite two decades of safe use.
“Not only do GE Free Northland’s claims of unacceptable risk fly in the face of science but, by injecting their requests part way through the planning process, they attempted to bypass due consideration of the plan changes and input by those who support a science based approach.
“Genetic modification has made a significant impact on the world’s ability to produce food while reducing agriculture’s impact on the climate and combating pests and disease.
“New genetic technologies, such as gene editing, are revolutionising medicine and agriculture. We cannot afford to stand back and, simply because of activist pressure, watch the world pass us by.
“Our farmers and conservationists need access to all the tools in the toolbox (including genetic technologies) if we are to address today’s biosecurity, climate change and water quality challenges and be predator free.
“If GE Free Northland has the strength of its convictions it will introduce a plan change itself in a manner where it can be properly scrutinised.
Sciences Network supports the Northland Regional Council’s
future-focused decision in rejecting an inadequate process
and, with other parties, will consider joining the Regional
Council to defend any appeal of this decision”, concluded