Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search

 


Lost – Billions in Revenue


Andrew Williams MP
Spokesperson for Revenue
7 May 2014


Lost – Billions in Revenue

The National Government’s ill-advised income tax cut in 2010 for higher earners has cost New Zealand over $4 billion in lost revenue, says New Zealand First.

“This was a totally misguided and irresponsible action that ignored the welfare of New Zealanders as a whole,” says New Zealand First Revenue Spokesperson Andrew Williams.

“In Parliament today Finance Minister Bill English struggled to provide adequate answers to questions on the subject and claimed additional revenue from GST, and property tax, offset the loss. The figures dispute everything he is saying.”

The Government reduced the tax rate on incomes over $70,000 from 38 per cent to 33 per cent in the 2010 Budget.

“Given all the cuts to public services in the four years since then, including conservation, biosecurity services, and a multitude of other cuts to agencies and important programmes, New Zealanders have paid a big price for this mismanagement of our finances.

“The New Zealand purse has also lost the benefit of dividend streams as the government sold state assets, against the wishes of a majority of New Zealanders.

“The lost revenue from three power companies – Meridian, Genesis and Mighty River - and Air New Zealand totalled about $146 million in the last six months alone. Imagine the services this revenue could have funded.

“The Government has ignored the overall welfare of most New Zealanders by cutting taxes for the higher earner and foregoing dividends by selling performing assets.

“The Government also stopped contributions to the New Zealand Superannuation scheme. The lost income from both the tax cuts and the dividends could have been invested for New Zealanders retirement super.”

ENDS

Income tax reduction

From 1 October 2010 the top income tax rate was reduced from 38 percent to 33 percent for incomes over $70,000.

The estimated cost of this income tax rate reduction is shown in the following table. Note that as the top income tax rate was reduced, the Crown would have received additional revenues through GST, excise duties and company taxes. This is because households would have spent some of their additional net disposable incomes, leading to further tax receipts in these other areas. Therefore, I have included two sets of numbers. The cost of reducing the top income tax rate, and the net cost after taking into account estimates of additional revenues through these other sources.

Year ended 30 JuneReduction in the top income tax rate from 38% to 33% (lost revenue ($m)Increase in revenue from additional GST, excise duties, and company tax revenues ($m)NET estimated cost of reducing the top income tax rate from 38% to 33%
9 months ended 30 June 2011642-132.0724
20121,079-166.3913
20131,092-168.3924
20141,202-185.21,017
Total of above ($m)4,015-651.83,578

The estimated cost of reducing the top income tax rate from 1 October 2010 through to 30 June 2014 is estimated at $4.0 billion. After taking into account additional GST, excise duties and company tax revenues, the net cost over this period is estimated at $3.6 billion.

Source: Parliamentary Library

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 

Gordon Campbell: On The Govt’s Token Plans For Cyber-Security

Basically, the world is divided into two types of people: those who think the Panama Papers illustrate the bad shit that some people do, and those who think the Panama Papers illustrate what needs to be done to make sure no-one else discovers the shit – good or bad – that they’re doing. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On Pharmac’s Grudging Concession To Reality

Is this any way to run a health system… whereby terminally ill patients are forced into public demonstrations before the government (and its funding agency Pharmac) will grudgingly provide the money for life-saving treatments freely available and publically funded in Australia for the best part of a year? More>>

ALSO:

Labour: Healthy Homes Bill Passes First Reading

Some of New Zealand’s most vulnerable children and families are on their way towards safer living conditions with the passing of the first reading of the Healthy Homes Guarantee Bill in Parliament last night, Leader of the Opposition Andrew Little says. More>>

ALSO:

Werewolf Satire: Home, And A Way

The one thing even more popular than an Auckland house is offering advice on how to afford an Auckland house. So, on the grounds it can’t be worse than some of the stuff that’s out there, here’s my three cents* worth. [*Up 50% since 2013!] More>>

ALSO:

Werewolf: The Defence Pretence

Last year, the world began spending more money on weapons again, for the first time since 2011... New Zealand belongs to a region – Asia and Oceania – where military spending rose sharply in 2015, by 5.4 per cent. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On Not Crying Foul, Argentina

So a couple of guys found to be criminally liable of environmental pollution in Argentina lodge an application with the Overseas Investment Office… in order to buy some prime New Zealand rural land. Seems that their factory back home had carelessly and/or intentionally discharged toxic waste into the Lujan river. Bummer... More>>

ALSO:

Urban & Rural: $303m To Merge And Modernise New Zealand’s Fire Services

Internal Affairs Minister Peter Dunne today announced funding of $303 million over five years to combine urban and rural fire services into one organisation from mid-2017. More>>

ALSO:

High Trust Regime: What Did The PM Tell His Lawyer About Foreign Trusts?

The Government stopped the IRD from reviewing New Zealand foreign trusts shortly after the Prime Minister’s lawyer wrote to the Revenue Minister claiming John Key had promised him the regime would not be changed. More>>

ALSO:

Get More From Scoop

 

LATEST HEADLINES

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Parliament
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news