Parliament

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search

 

Lost – Billions in Revenue


Andrew Williams MP
Spokesperson for Revenue
7 May 2014


Lost – Billions in Revenue

The National Government’s ill-advised income tax cut in 2010 for higher earners has cost New Zealand over $4 billion in lost revenue, says New Zealand First.

“This was a totally misguided and irresponsible action that ignored the welfare of New Zealanders as a whole,” says New Zealand First Revenue Spokesperson Andrew Williams.

“In Parliament today Finance Minister Bill English struggled to provide adequate answers to questions on the subject and claimed additional revenue from GST, and property tax, offset the loss. The figures dispute everything he is saying.”

The Government reduced the tax rate on incomes over $70,000 from 38 per cent to 33 per cent in the 2010 Budget.

“Given all the cuts to public services in the four years since then, including conservation, biosecurity services, and a multitude of other cuts to agencies and important programmes, New Zealanders have paid a big price for this mismanagement of our finances.

“The New Zealand purse has also lost the benefit of dividend streams as the government sold state assets, against the wishes of a majority of New Zealanders.

“The lost revenue from three power companies – Meridian, Genesis and Mighty River - and Air New Zealand totalled about $146 million in the last six months alone. Imagine the services this revenue could have funded.

“The Government has ignored the overall welfare of most New Zealanders by cutting taxes for the higher earner and foregoing dividends by selling performing assets.

“The Government also stopped contributions to the New Zealand Superannuation scheme. The lost income from both the tax cuts and the dividends could have been invested for New Zealanders retirement super.”

ENDS

Income tax reduction

From 1 October 2010 the top income tax rate was reduced from 38 percent to 33 percent for incomes over $70,000.

The estimated cost of this income tax rate reduction is shown in the following table. Note that as the top income tax rate was reduced, the Crown would have received additional revenues through GST, excise duties and company taxes. This is because households would have spent some of their additional net disposable incomes, leading to further tax receipts in these other areas. Therefore, I have included two sets of numbers. The cost of reducing the top income tax rate, and the net cost after taking into account estimates of additional revenues through these other sources.

Year ended 30 JuneReduction in the top income tax rate from 38% to 33% (lost revenue ($m)Increase in revenue from additional GST, excise duties, and company tax revenues ($m)NET estimated cost of reducing the top income tax rate from 38% to 33%
9 months ended 30 June 2011642-132.0724
20121,079-166.3913
20131,092-168.3924
20141,202-185.21,017
Total of above ($m)4,015-651.83,578

The estimated cost of reducing the top income tax rate from 1 October 2010 through to 30 June 2014 is estimated at $4.0 billion. After taking into account additional GST, excise duties and company tax revenues, the net cost over this period is estimated at $3.6 billion.

Source: Parliamentary Library

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Gordon Campbell: On The Fallout From The Barclay Tape

This is hardly a case of cleaning out your desk and being turfed out onto the pavement.

As others have pointed out, the disgraced Clutha-Southland MP will remain on the public payroll for three months until the election, and for three months afterwards. More>>

 

Ombudsman: Canterbury Schools Reorganisation Mishandled

An investigation into the Canterbury schools reorganisation after the February 2011 earthquakes has found significant gaps and flaws in the Ministry’s engagement and communications with schools and communities. More>>

ALSO:

Law Commission: Contempt Report "Protects Right To Fair Trial"

The proposed Act limits what news media representatives and bloggers can report on court proceedings, but it also makes clearer than the current law where the line is between contempt and freedom of expression. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On Our Refugee Intake (And Uber’s Woes)

On figures released this week, there are currently 65.6 million people worldwide who have been displaced from their homes by war, famine or other external causes… More>>

ALSO:

IGIS Report: GCSB Support For Groser WTO Bid Not Illegal

“The inquiry has found that the GCSB did not act unlawfully or improperly in providing assistance to the New Zealand government campaign”, Ms Gwyn said. More>>

ALSO:

PM's Press Conference: Pike And Houses

There were questions on Pike River mine re-entry after new video from inside the drift was released over the weekend. English maintained a human effort would not be feasible irrespective of any future coalition demands from NZ First. He said the government would continue to work with families on non-manned re-entry. More>>

ALSO:

Flogging A Dead Horse: NZ First Seeks New s59 Referendum

10 years on from the so called “anti-smacking” law - NZ First calls for a binding referendum. NZ First MP Tracey Martin told TVNZ’s Q+A programme that the law change has had a “chilling effect” on NZ parents including herself. More>>

ALSO:

Always Interesting: Internet Party Has New Leader

The Internet Party has a new leader: Suzie Dawson... She currently resides in Moscow, Russia, where she has applied for temporary asylum due to severe persecution she reports being subjected to by those whose corruption she worked to expose.More>>

 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

Featured InfoPages

Opening the Election
 
 
 
  • PublicAddress
  • Pundit
  • Kiwiblog
More RSS News Alerts