Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search

 


Lost – Billions in Revenue


Andrew Williams MP
Spokesperson for Revenue
7 May 2014


Lost – Billions in Revenue

The National Government’s ill-advised income tax cut in 2010 for higher earners has cost New Zealand over $4 billion in lost revenue, says New Zealand First.

“This was a totally misguided and irresponsible action that ignored the welfare of New Zealanders as a whole,” says New Zealand First Revenue Spokesperson Andrew Williams.

“In Parliament today Finance Minister Bill English struggled to provide adequate answers to questions on the subject and claimed additional revenue from GST, and property tax, offset the loss. The figures dispute everything he is saying.”

The Government reduced the tax rate on incomes over $70,000 from 38 per cent to 33 per cent in the 2010 Budget.

“Given all the cuts to public services in the four years since then, including conservation, biosecurity services, and a multitude of other cuts to agencies and important programmes, New Zealanders have paid a big price for this mismanagement of our finances.

“The New Zealand purse has also lost the benefit of dividend streams as the government sold state assets, against the wishes of a majority of New Zealanders.

“The lost revenue from three power companies – Meridian, Genesis and Mighty River - and Air New Zealand totalled about $146 million in the last six months alone. Imagine the services this revenue could have funded.

“The Government has ignored the overall welfare of most New Zealanders by cutting taxes for the higher earner and foregoing dividends by selling performing assets.

“The Government also stopped contributions to the New Zealand Superannuation scheme. The lost income from both the tax cuts and the dividends could have been invested for New Zealanders retirement super.”

ENDS

Income tax reduction

From 1 October 2010 the top income tax rate was reduced from 38 percent to 33 percent for incomes over $70,000.

The estimated cost of this income tax rate reduction is shown in the following table. Note that as the top income tax rate was reduced, the Crown would have received additional revenues through GST, excise duties and company taxes. This is because households would have spent some of their additional net disposable incomes, leading to further tax receipts in these other areas. Therefore, I have included two sets of numbers. The cost of reducing the top income tax rate, and the net cost after taking into account estimates of additional revenues through these other sources.

Year ended 30 JuneReduction in the top income tax rate from 38% to 33% (lost revenue ($m)Increase in revenue from additional GST, excise duties, and company tax revenues ($m)NET estimated cost of reducing the top income tax rate from 38% to 33%
9 months ended 30 June 2011642-132.0724
20121,079-166.3913
20131,092-168.3924
20141,202-185.21,017
Total of above ($m)4,015-651.83,578

The estimated cost of reducing the top income tax rate from 1 October 2010 through to 30 June 2014 is estimated at $4.0 billion. After taking into account additional GST, excise duties and company tax revenues, the net cost over this period is estimated at $3.6 billion.

Source: Parliamentary Library

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 

Gordon Campbell: On Bank Scandals (And Air Crashes)

Last month, the Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) filed proceedings against Westpac over activities that have some distinct echoes of the Libor scandal. More>>

Budget: Health Funding Must Keep Up With Need

NZNO: “The nursing team has been doing more with less for years. It’s getting to the point that we’re really worried about our colleagues, our patients, our jobs and the level of health care available for people in our country." More>>

ALSO:

Emissions Inventory: Time For The Government To Do The Right Thing

It’s time for the National Government to step up and do the right thing to reduce climate pollution as data shows New Zealand’s greenhouse gas emissions are higher than ever, the Green Party said today. More>>

ALSO:

Budget 2016: More Partnership Schools To Open

Seven new schools will join the eight Partnership Schools already open, along with further new schools opening in 2017. “The growth of this policy is a reflection of the high level of interest from educators and community leaders,” Mr Seymour says. More>>

ALSO:

No Correspondence With English: Did Brownlee Make Up Sale Of Navy Ships ‘On The Hoof?’

Having revealed that several Royal New Zealand Navy vessels have not left port in years, New Zealand First is now asking the Minister of Defence to prove he did not come up with the idea of selling HMNZS Taupo and Pukaki until the media asked him. More>>

Housing Plans: Labour- Abolish Auckland Urban Boundary
The Government should rule out any possibility of an urban growth boundary in Auckland Council’s Unitary Plan if it is serious about fixing the housing crisis. More>>
Greens - State House Solution
The Homes Not Cars policy allows Housing New Zealand to retain its dividend and, in addition, would refund its tax, to spend on the emergency building of around 450 new state houses. More>>

ALSO:

Houses And Taxes: Post-Cabinet, Pre-Budget Press Conference

The Prime Minister said that the pre-budget announcements showed that his Government is “investing in a growing economy”. He re-affirmed the National Government’s commitment to lowering personal tax rates but that any such change must fit with the fiscal reality of the time. More>>

ALSO:

Get More From Scoop

 

LATEST HEADLINES

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Parliament
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news