Free Press ACT’s regular bulletin
Free Press
ACT’s regular
bulletin
They're at it
Again
Remember the Electoral Finance Act?
This assault on democracy was the Clark Government's epitaph
(ACT's John Boscawen helped it into its grave with enormous
Queen St Marches for Democracy). Well, the Labour party are
attacking democracy again.
In Over His
Head
Education Minister Chris Hipkins is
already overloaded. Not only is he the Education Minister
but also the Leader of the House, a position usually held by
a big gun like Gerry Brownlee. He is feeling the pressure.
Free Press has seen petulant correspondence from Hipkins
unbecoming of a student, let alone an Education Minister. A
good teacher would smack his little bum.
What's the Issue?
The
Government is trying to bully parliament out of holding it
accountable by cutting back select committees. Because they
expanded the number of Ministers and Under-Secretaries to a
record 31, they've gotten short of MPs to sit on Select
Committees. Their solution? Just reduce the number of MPs
from all parties on Select Committees.
Skip this Bit if You Don't Want the
Details
In the last parliament there were 13
regular Select Committees with 120 seats. Roughly, 60 for
the Government and 60 for the opposition. This was hard work
for the Government, because Ministers generally don't sit on
committees so the 60-odd Government seats were filled by
only 35 people (plus Under-Secretary Seymour, always a good
sport). By appointing a record 31 MPs to Ministerial and
Under-Secretarial posts, they've left only 32 Government
non-executive MPs to fill all of the select committee slots.
This is why they want to reduce the Select Committees down
to 12 committees of 8, meaning 96 seats. About 46 of these
go to National and ACT MPs, but there are 57 of us. That
means 11 members of parliament will not sit on Select
Committees.
Taxpayer Loses
Again
When New
Zealand got rid of its Upper House of Parliament, Select
Committees were supposed to do the job of scrutinising the
Government's work. They are important and make up about a
1/3 of a back bench MP's workload (the other thirds being
electorate work and debating in the House). The New
Government is making sure that 11 MPs will be idle for a
third of the time.
$11 Million Dollar
Waste
As a rule of thumb an MP costs a
million dollars a year once you allow for staff, offices,
flights, and so on. If eleven MPs lose a third of their job
for three years then the Government has just wasted $11
million.
Much Bigger
Waste
Of course, that is not the real waste.
It is a record 31 Ministers and undersecretaries with their
wild tax-and-spend policies, held accountable by fewer and
smaller select committies. Taxpayers will pay and pay as a
super-sized Government attempts to bully the very
institution of Parliament that's there to hold it
accountable.
Parliamageddon
The new Leader
of the House can't have spent much time reading standing
orders. If all parties do not agree on procedural matters
like establishing Select Committees, then they go to
time-unlimited parliamentary debates. ACT has always been an
opposition party, and we cannot wait to get stuck in.
Parliamageddon II
Meanwhile,
it has been suggested that the Government should get the
majority of the speaking time in Parliament and ACT, none at
all. When asked which MP irritates here the most, Jacinda
Ardern named David Seymour as 'getting under her skin.'
Trying to silence ACT in parliament is not only a
constitutional outrage but will lead to another
time-unlimited debate from ACT and National. At this rate,
the first weeks of the Ardern Prime Ministership will be a
circus.
A word to the
Wise
The inexperienced Leader of the House
should think carefully about the tradition he is inheriting.
Westminster Parliaments are designed to restrain tyranny
and, with the possible exception of the American system,
they are peerless. Built up over centuries in the Standing
Orders and Speakers' Rulings are a gauntlet of traps for
young players a little sick of self love, and the opposition
will be using them widely. After all, what's the point in
inheriting an institution like Parliament if you're not
going to use it?