Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 


Stadium Debacle? You Ain’t Seen Nothing Yet

NEWS RELEASE

Stadium Debacle? You Ain’t Seen Nothing Yet

Auckland 27 November 2006 – “If the citizens of Auckland are expressing dismay and disappointment about local government process and disclosure over the planned Auckland City stadium, then there is an issue equal to or even bigger looming up harbour” says WAAG (Whenuapai Airbase Action Group Inc) President Russell Stewart, a retired Air New Zealand 747 captain with over 40 years aviation experience.

As Auckland City was locked in talks and split sides over the pros and cons of having a stadium on their waterfront, in the same week, North Shore City Council presided over councillor Tony Holman’s motion for North Shore City Council to revoke its earlier decision to enter into a commercial agreement with airport company Infratil. It is the second time in as many months that a debate, which has yet to be fully shared with its community has been hotly contested within the council walls of North Shore City. Once again the council appeared split down the middle.

The October voting on this issue saw a hung council with Mayor Wood taking the highly unusual step of using his casting vote to push the motion forward. At this week’s meeting, once again the council vote was split upholding the original council decision with a majority of one - which had it not been for the absence of well noted opponent of the airport, Councillor Margeret Miles, voting would once again been evenly divided.

It would appear that North Shore City Councillors are facing the same well publicised dilemma and frustrations as their Auckland colleagues. In the North Shore case this includes making decisions that will have far reaching economic, social and environmental effects on the northern and north western communities without any of the basic elements required for responsible decision making.

This includes; absence of a business plan to support the much touted but unsubstantiated economic wonders that may land with a second airport – one that currently has no confirmed customers or domestic connections but does have well publicised opposition from the national carrier, Air New Zealand.

Also missing in the vital ingredients for informed decision making is a comprehensive environmental impact report which would assess the risks and needs of one of the regions most fragile estuarine eco systems and a recreational waterway of exceptional beauty.

Perhaps most telling and disappointing of all is that, unlike Auckland City which at least enjoyed the benefit of numerous high profile public opinion polls, some North Shore City Councillors are basing their decision on an opinion poll with a sample of just 300 selected residents from a population base of more than 220,000. A 2004 survey conducted by the Ministry of Defence based on 2200 voluntary submissions returned an overwhelming 75% against the commercial airport plan.

Councillor Holman’s speech supporting his motion presented the following key points:

Key inconsistencies in the portrayal of North Shore City as a ‘lifestyle city’ and
Waitakere City as an ‘eco city’ and the pursuit of commercial aviation activities in
the region which would result in more than 50 harmful pollutants being discharged into the environment with each aircraft manoeuvre - many of which are carcinogenic. Compelling evidence from international studies support the case to minimise such compounds from our environments. Studies referred to by Councillor Holman cited increased asthma rates, increased rates of pregnancy complications and increased infant mortality as just some of the effects communities exposed to these compounds could expect. Exposure to carcinogenic compounds is well know and widely accepted as being linked to various cancers, respiratory problems, liver damage and heart disease to name but a few.


Following the council meeting, Councillor Holman told WAAG supporters that he was “concerned and astonished that in an era when private and corporate citizens throughout the world are trying to reduce aviation activity and emission levels, two of New Zealand’s most environmentally unique and precious cities are intent on pursuing an activity which flies in the face of popular opinion, has no proven economic benefits and will seriously compromise the health of the region and its environment for future generations.”

Noise. Councillor Holman noted that in parallel dispatches his colleagues correctly offered their support to the people of North Shore’s harbour front suburb of Devonport who opposed a waterfront stadium in Auckland City because of the noise that would carry across the water but that some councillors did not have the same concerns about airport noise. Councillor Holman noted that no mention had been made of sound proofing schools in the surrounding area to protect young ears from stadium noise, but such a contingency was part of the planning for an airport, the flight path of which would affect many schools in the East Coast Bays, Greenhithe, Albany and Birkdale areas.
WAAG’s Mr Stewart says that the council’s pursuit of an agreement with Infratil and therefore their support of a commercial airport at Whenuapai is “deeply disappointing “ and he urges members of the North Shore community and other key stakeholders who include “basically anyone and everyone who cares one ounce for the environment and our community” to add their support to his 1000 strong community lobby group and do what they can to get North Shore City Council to overturn a decision which “is hardly convincing in that it has the support of only half of the Council members and has been made without any meaningful economic, environmental or social impact studies or any consultation with the ratepayers as is required by the Local Government Act” says Mr Stewart.
END

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 

Also, Loan Interest: Productivity Commission On Tertiary Education

Key recommendations include better quality control; making it easier for students to transfer between courses; abolishing University Entrance; enabling tertiary institutions to own and control their assets; making it easier for new providers to enter the system; and facilitating more and faster innovation by tertiary education providers... More>>

ALSO:

Higher Payments: Wellington Regional Council Becomes A Living Wage Employer

Councillor Sue Kedgley said she was delighted that the Wellington Regional Council unanimously adopted her motion to become a Living Wage employer, making it the first regional council in New Zealand to do so. More>>

ALSO:

Scoop Images:
Dame Patsy Reddy Sworn In As Governor-General

This morning Dame Patsy Reddy was sworn in as the New Zealand Realm’s 21st Governor-General. The ceremony began with a pōwhiri to welcome Dame Patsy and her husband Sir David Gascoigne to Parliament. More>>

ALSO:

Ruataniwha: DOC, Hawke's Bay Council Developer Take Supreme Court Appeal

The Department of Conservation and Hawke's Bay Regional Investment Company (HBRIC) are appealing to the Supreme Court over a conservation land swap which the Court of Appeal halted. More>>

ALSO:

With NZ's Marama Davidson: Women’s Flotilla Leaves Sicily – Heading For Gaza

Women representing 13 countries spanning five continents began their journey yesterday on Zaytouna-Oliva to the shores of Gaza, which has been under blockade since 2007. On board are a Nobel Peace Laureate, three parliamentarians, a decorated US diplomat, journalists, an Olympic athlete, and a physician. A list of the women with their background can be found here. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The Key Style Of Crisis Management

At Monday’s post Cabinet press conference Key was in his finest wide- eyed “Problem? What problem?” mode. No, there wasn’t really a problem that top MPI officials had been at odds with each other over the meaning of the fisheries policy and how that policy should be pursued... More>>

ALSO:

Mt Roskill: Greens Will Not Stand In Likely Post-Goff By-Election

“The Green Party’s priority is changing the Government in 2017, and as part of that we’ve decided that we won’t stand a candidate in the probable Mt Roskill by-election... This decision shows the Memorandum of Understanding between Labour and the Green Party is working." More>>

ALSO:

Get More From Scoop

 

LATEST HEADLINES

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Politics
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news