Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 

Judgment: Fowler Developments, Quake Outcasts v CERA

[Full judgment: Fowler_Developments_Ltd_v_CE_CERA_and_Quake_Outcasts_v_Min_for_CER_and_O.pdf]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND

CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY
CIV-2013-409-000274

[2013] NZHC 2173

BETWEEN FOWLER DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED

Applicant
AND THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKE RECOVERY AUTHORITY

Respondent
AND THE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION

Intervener

CIV-2013-409-000843

BETWEEN QUAKE OUTCASTS

Applicant
AND THE MINISTER FOR CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKE RECOVERY

First Respondent
AND THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKE RECOVERY AUTHORITY

Second Respondent
AND THE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION

Intervener

Hearing: 22,23, 24 July 2013
Counsel: S P Rennie and J E Bayley for Fowler Developments

FMR Cooke QC, MSR Palmer and LJC McLoughlin-Ware for Quake Outcasts

D J Goddard QC, P A McCarthy and A J Wicks for Respondents
Judgment: 26 August 2013

JUDGMENT OF PANCKHURST J

[…]

[1] This case concerns two applications for judicial review heard together by consent. The genesis of each proceeding was the making of offers by the chief executive of the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority (CERA) to purchase either vacant land, or uninsured residential properties, for 50 percent of the 2007 rating value of the land. The land or properties are situated in the Christchurch residential red zone. The zone defines land areas considered unlikely to be suitable for continued residential occupation for a prolonged period.

[2] The applicants, Fowler Developments Limited and the Quake Outcasts (an unincorporated group of land and property owners who are identified in a schedule containing individual names and addresses) are aggrieved at the level of the buy-out offer. In particular, they consider that their treatment is unequal by comparison to that accorded to insured residential property owners who received a 100 percent buy-out offer.

[3] The applications for judicial review assert various grounds of challenge. The principal ground is that the 50 percent offers are unlawful because they were not made in accordance with the requirements of the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Act 2011 (the Act). It is also alleged that the 50 percent offers are oppressive, disproportionate, and in breach of the applicants’ human rights.

[4] The principal relief sought is that the decisions which gave rise to the 50 percent offer be set aside and that the decision-maker(s) be required to reconsider the individual situations of the applicants in terms of the purposes and principles of the Act.

[5] The Human Rights Commission (HRC) was joined as an intervener, since it considers that the case raises significant human rights concerns. The Commission filed detailed written submissions, but did not appear at the hearing.

[...]

Conclusion

[102] Accordingly I make:

(a) A declaration that the decision to offer to purchase the properties of the applicants on the terms announced by the Minister on 13 September 2012 was not made according to law and is set aside, as are the offers subsequently made to the applicants by the chief executive.

(b) A direction that the Minister and the chief executive reconsider and reach a new decision to purchase the applicants’ properties, such decision to be made in accordance with law:

(i) as required by the purposes and principles of the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Act 2011, and

(ii) with regard paid to the reasons contained in this judgment.

Leave is reserved to the parties to revert to the Court in relation to the terms of relief in [81] and [102] if clarification is required.


[103] Costs are reserved. The applicants may file a memorandum within 15 working days, to which the respondents may reply within 10 working days.


[Full judgment: Fowler_Developments_Ltd_v_CE_CERA_and_Quake_Outcasts_v_Min_for_CER_and_O.pdf]

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Gordon Campbell: On The Budget

It may seem like Oliver to be so bold as to ask the Finance Minister for more gruel – but what the Dickens, Steven Joyce… is this Budget really as good as it gets?

Supposedly, the public was going to receive significant rewards – an election year lolly scramble no less – for the eight years of belt tightening that they’ve endured, and for the rundown of essential public services.

Well, what Budget 2017 delivered instead in Education and in Health were allocations barely sufficient to maintain the current levels of service delivery More>>

Scoop Full Coverage: of Budget Announcements & Reaction
Latest: Scoop Search

 
 

PM's Press Conference: Two More Troops?

Prime Minister Bill English gave a summary his highlights of last week’s budget announcement... The Prime minister was asked about NATO’s request for New Zealand to send two more personnel to Afghanistan and whether or not we will send them. More>>

ALSO:

Carer Settlement: Threat Of Staff Exodus In Mental Health

As a result of the recent pay rise awarded to their aged care and disability sector colleagues, many staff in non-government mental health and addiction organisations are considering leaving to join these workforces. More>>

ALSO:

Climate Policy: New Zealand Set To Blow Its Carbon Budget By 27%

The Government’s Greenhouse Gas Inventory shows New Zealand is set to release 647.5 million tonnes of carbon emissions between 2013 and 2020 – 137 million tonnes more than we are allowed under the Kyoto Protocol. More>>

ALSO:

Earlier:

Christchurch Considers Cathedral, Stadium: Cathedral Working Group Report Released

“About half of Christchurch wants to see the cathedral reinstated, the other half wants something new and more modern, but really, everyone just needs a decision." More>>

ALSO:

Auditor-General Stands Down For Investigation: Gordon Campbell On (Not) Taking Responsibility

So Martin Matthews, our current Auditor-General wishes he could have detected “earlier” the fraud that occurred on his watch at the Ministry of Transport. Hmmm. But he could have detected it earlier, surely? That’s the point. More>>

ALSO:

 
 
 
 

Opening The Election Supporters

 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

Featured InfoPages

Opening the Election