Alternative to Cigarettes Still Outlawed
Another 10% Tobacco Tax Hike – But Alternative to
Cigarettes Still
Outlawed
31 DECEMBER
2016
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
As smokers
stock up on cigarettes today to beat the Government’s 10%
hike in tobacco excise tax which comes into effect on New
Year’s Day, the Taxpayers’ Union says that the
Government's failure to follow other OECD countries in
legalising e-cigarettes containing nicotine shows that
higher tobacco taxes are really about raising revenue than
promoting public
health.
Taxpayers’
Union Executive Director, Jordan Williams, says: “As
detailed in our report on cigarette taxes published earlier
in the year, the scientific consensus is that e-cigarettes
are at least 90% less harmful than traditional fags.” The
report, Passive Income: how the government uses
smokers as cash cows, is available at http://www.taxpayers.org.nz/passive_income.
"From
New Years Day, a 20 pack of cigarettes retailing for $22
will include around $18 of tax,” says Mr Williams.
“Refusal to allow the sale of healthier alternatives
indicates that the Government’s underlying motive is the
tax revenue, not helping smokers kick the habit. Why else
is the Government preventing Kiwi smokers from accessing the
most popular smoking cessation tool used in
Britain?"
“No one would argue against smokers being
taxed to cover the costs of their habit. But hiking taxes,
when they already cover the costs more than three times
over, needs to be questioned. The politicians keep crying
crocodile tears about the higher taxes being about health
but this year they again delayed the legalisation of the
sale of healthier e-cigarettes containing
nicotine."
"Increases in tobacco excise tax are often
held up as interventions that are effective at reducing
consumption amongst low socio-economic groups. However,
significant tax increases have coincided with an increase in
the socio-economic smoking gradient. Counterintuitively,
the poor are the least likely to respond to tax hikes. That
means they, and their families, go without.”
"Just
because a consumer base is poor, it does not mean that the
Government is any more justified in making consumer health
choices for them. Worse, increasing taxes well in excess of
the health costs of tobacco, knowing that they are being
paid by those least able to afford it, is morally
questionable."
ENDS