Upper Selwyn Huts Decision Day Looms

Tuesday, 26 August 2025, 10:22 am
Article: Jonathan Leask - Local Democracy Reporter

Upper Selwyn Huts residents look likely to avoid eviction and finally learn what their future holds.

The Selwyn District Council will make the final decision on the future deed of licence for Upper Selwyn Huts on September 17 after deliberating on the submissions for over four hours on August 21.

The councillors on the hearing panel were leaning towards a recommendation of a 30-year license period that can be renewed.

There was no support for the environmental triggers (such as major flood events) that could terminate the licences, but plenty of debate around introducing a bond for future land remediation.

The first fisherman's huts at the Upper Selwyn Huts were built in 1888, and over time more buildings were added for temporary use but some huts have become home to permanent residents – with council issuing 96 occupancy licences and locals estimating around 150 people live at the settlement.

In 2017, the council explored the options of refusing to renew licences or to renew them for a lesser term, and decided in 2019 that the licences and renewals were "short-term and ultimately for a finite period”.

The council, in March 2024, voted to confirm residents would have to leave by 2039, but by July paused the process for further consultation.

The deliberations followed 209 submissions, in which 86% indicated that they opposed a closing date for the settlement being imposed, a message that was heard loud and clear at the hearings on August 7.

The council had proposed three options - a five-year fixed term with no renewal, a single fixed term of 30 years, or rolling 10-year terms with the ability to renew, up to a maximum of 30 years.

Almost 70% of submitters didn’t select any of those options. Cr Lydia Gliddon supported 30 years without a fixed end date as she didn’t have a “strong why”.

“Of why we would say you need to leave your homes”.

An end date is “arbitrary and unnecessary and forces retreat before science justifies it”.

Cr Grant Miller said there is no immediate reason to withhold a license, but the community needed to know of the significant ongoing risks.

“There is going to come a time that this community becomes unviable.”

He cautioned against a blanket 30-year licence and instead supported three 10-year periods to allow for regular reviews.

The councillors didn’t support the environmental triggers that had been consulted on, with Cr Elizabeth Mundt describing them as “quite pathetic”.

“The reality is, everybody has an expectation if their property is flooded once or twice in their lifetime, that they get the cleaners in and they sort it out – that’s quite normal.

Mayor Sam Broughton said, in summary of the councillors’ comments, that “there's very little appetite for the [environmental] triggers that were consulted on and there's legal risk if we introduce new triggers”.

The councillors noted that renegotiating the lake opening protocols is looming large, as it will determine the trigger point the lake levels and when it is able to be opened to the sea.

Introducing a bond to recover future remediation costs at the end of a license term was a divisive issue, and will likely be a cause for debate on August 21.

Broughton said the decision on the bond may be down to the cost, which would be an annual plan discussion.

The suggestion was that a bond could be included in the licence, initially at $0, until it is discussed at the next annual plan or a future council decides it is required.

The final consideration was introducing building condition inspections, which didn’t garner much support from the councillors.

Councillors supported a new 30-year licence, but with some consideration to options for some form of regular review.

The current licence fee expired on July 1, but due to the consultation process, it was extended to July 1, 2026.

The decision report will come to the council meeting on August 21.

-Local Democracy Reporting is local body journalism funded by RNZ and NZ On Air

© Scoop Media

Local Democracy Reporting

Content from the Local Democracy Reporting (LDR) service is published by Scoop as a registered New Zealand Media Outlet LDR Partner.