Retirement age situation clarified

Chief Justice, Dame Sian
Elias, has today released her declaratory judgment in the
case between Otago University and its principal campus
unions, the Association of University Staff (AUS) and the
Public Service Association.
AUS Executive Director, Rob Crozier, said in Wellington today that the judgment was a victory for common sense.
“Otago University management sought to continue to be able to make people retire when they reach age 65, even though the Human Rights Act had made that approach unlawful,” said Mr Crozier.
“The case hinged on the implications of the Human Rights Act for staff who were employed prior to 1 April 1992 and whose contract of employment continued to contain a retirement age provision.
“The judge has declared that section 149(2) of the Human Rights Act 1991 does not permit variation or confirmation of a retirement age specified in an employment contract unless the employment contract was in force on 1 April 1992 and remains in force.
“It is possible that a small number of employees not covered by the unions’ collective employment contract could still face compulsory retirement.
“The Human Rights Commission supported the restrictive interpretation that the unions were arguing for and which the Court adopted,” he said.
Contacts:
Rob Crozier: (04) 915 6691 (wk) 021 375 661
Philip
Cheyne (counsel for AUS) : 03 379 5718 021 343
473
University of Auckland: Junk Food Designed To Make Us Eat More, Study Finds
Spark: New Report Sets Out Outcomes-Led Approach To Lift Rural Connectivity Using The Right Mix Of Technologies
Bill Bennett: Fixed Voice Rules Head For Deregulation
UN Department of Global Communications: United Nations Proposes New Global Dashboard To Measure Progress Beyond GDP
Banking Ombudsman Scheme: Fraud Check Delays Well Worth The Inconvenience, Says Banking Ombudsman
Asia Pacific AML: NZ’s Financial Crime Gap - Beyond The 'Number 8 Wire' Mentality

