Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Leave to Appeal: University of Canterbury v ICNZ
UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY v THE INSURANCE COUNCIL OF NEW
ZEALAND INCORPORATED [2014] NZSC 13 [26 February 2014]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW ZEALAND
SC 120/2013
[2014] NZSC 13
BETWEEN UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY
Applicant
AND THE INSURANCE COUNCIL OF NEW ZEALAND
INCORPORATED
First Respondent
CHRISTCHURCH CITY
COUNCIL
Second Respondent
BODY CORPORATE 423446
(OXFORD BODY CORPORATE)
Third Respondent
[…]
Judgment: 26 February 2014
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
The application for leave to appeal is granted on the
following question:
Where a building is an
earthquake-prone building in terms of s 122(1) of the
Building Act 2004, is a council entitled under s
124(1)(c)(i) of the Act to require the building to be
strengthened to an extent greater than is necessary to
ensure that the building will not have its ultimate capacity
exceeded in a moderate earthquake (as defined in reg 7 of
the Building (Specified Systems, Change the Use and
Earthquake-prone Buildings) Regulations 2005)?
Full
descision: SC_120_2013__University_of_Canterbury_v_ICNZ_Inc.pdf
Bill Bennett: Fixed Voice Rules Head For Deregulation
UN Department of Global Communications: United Nations Proposes New Global Dashboard To Measure Progress Beyond GDP
Banking Ombudsman Scheme: Fraud Check Delays Well Worth The Inconvenience, Says Banking Ombudsman
Asia Pacific AML: NZ’s Financial Crime Gap - Beyond The 'Number 8 Wire' Mentality
Westpac New Zealand: Kiwi Households Adapting Despite Widespread Cost Pressure Concerns, Westpac Survey Shows
University of Auckland: Kids’ Screen Use Linked To Long-Term Deficits In Self-Control And Attention
